Vodafone and Three permitted to tie the knot – if they promise to behave
- Reference: 1733404631
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2024/12/05/cma_vodafone_three_approved/
- Source link:
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) announced that the union of the two telcos should be allowed to proceed, if both sign binding commitments to implement their network investment plan, provide consumer price protections, and preset contractual terms for mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) for three years.
This outcome had been [1]signaled by the CMA for several months now, despite fears that the move will lead to inflated bills for customers and hit MVNOs by reducing the number of companies with physical infrastructure they can approach for deals to deliver their own services.
[2]
"It's crucial this merger doesn't harm competition, which is why we've spent time considering how it could impact the telecoms market," said Stuart McIntosh, chair of the independent inquiry group leading the CMA investigation.
[3]
[4]
"Having carefully considered the evidence, as well as the extensive feedback we have received, we believe the merger is likely to boost competition in the UK mobile sector and should be allowed to proceed – but only if Vodafone and Three agree to implement our proposed measures."
The deal is expected to formally complete during the first half of 2025, with Vodafone owning 51 percent of the post-merger entity ("MergeCo").
[5]
What "MergeCo" will officially be known as is yet to be decided, according to a Vodafone spokesperson, who told us that the two firms are not allowed to formally engage on details like that until the transaction is approved.
However, Voda has stated that after three years, it may acquire the remaining 49 percent stake of the company from Three's parent, CK Hutchison, subject to certain conditions, which would effectively make it Vodafone.
In a statement, Voda's CEO Margherita Della Valle claimed that the approval "releases the handbrake on the UK's telecoms industry," promising that "consumers and businesses will enjoy wider coverage, faster speeds, and better-quality connections across the UK, as we build the biggest and best network in our home market."
[6]
On Three's behalf, CK Hutchison Group Chairman Canning Fok said: "When Three and Vodafone are combined, CK Hutchison will fully support the merged business in implementing its network investment plan, the cornerstone of today's approval by the CMA, transforming the UK's digital infrastructure and ensuring customers across the country benefit from world-beating network quality."
That network investment plan involves pumping £11 billion ($14 billion) into merging and improving the infrastructure of the two operators over the next eight years. This will entail upgrades to support [7]5G Standalone (5G SA) capabilities and extending its reach to cover 99 percent of the UK population.
The CMA wants legally binding commitments to this as it has [8]previously expressed doubts that Vodafone and Three would deliver on the full package of improvements otherwise.
It also wants binding commitments to cap selected mobile tariffs and data plans for three years to protect customers from price rises in the immediate post-merger era, and also preset prices and contract terms for wholesale services over the same period to protect MVNOs.
Both the CMA and Ofcom will oversee this commitment, and the conjoined entity will be required to publish an annual report setting out its progress on the implementation of the network plan.
This outcome has largely been met with qualified approval, mostly because the most strident critics during the consultation period appear to be keeping silent – for now.
[9]Brit telcos to clash in high-speed mmWave spectrum showdown next year
[10]Watchdog reluctantly blesses Vodafone-Three merger – with strings attached
[11]UK watchdog hints Voda-Three merger will likely pass
[12]Game of phones: Voda-Three merger left rivals dialing for help
"The CMA's decision to approve the merger is the right one and largely strikes a good balance between nurturing competition and encouraging investment. It should pave the way for more efficient investments to bring about much-needed improvements to mobile services in the UK," said Kester Mann, CCS Insight Director of Consumer and Connectivity.
He added that the outcome is "about as good as it could have got for Vodafone and Three. Not only did they secure approval, but the agreed remedies and commitments are less onerous than feared."
PP Foresight analyst and founder Paolo Pescatore warned that it will take many years before the full merits of the deal are realized, and there will be a lot of tough decisions to come in the meantime.
"Merging two networks is no easy feat. While there are past examples with BT/EE and VMO2 to draw upon, it's not going to be smooth sailing," he said, adding that it is a big deal for both players, especially for Three "given its business model would have been unsustainable in the long term."
Alex Haffner, competition partner at UK law firm Fladgate, expressed surprise that the CMA has settled for behavioral remedies only.
"Over the past decade a multitude of mobile network mergers across Europe have been permitted only on the basis of significant structural remedies being conceded by the merging parties. In doing so, the CMA has displayed a degree of pragmatism, sensing that consumers will ultimately benefit more from competition between three well-resourced mobile operators in the UK market," he stated.
Both BT/EE and Sky Mobile came out strongly against this merger being permitted during the consultation, but neither had anything to say when we contacted them.
The CMA said that the publication of its final report marks the end of its Phase 2 merger investigation. If Vodafone and Three agree to the commitments, the CMA will work to implement them; otherwise, it will simply block the deal.
Vodafone and Three said they will study the CMA's final report in detail, and will "continue to engage with the CMA as they put in place the final undertakings." ®
Get our [13]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2024/11/05/uk_regulator_hints_vodathree_merger
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Z1HcMf9jyF4FcyWCI7VS4AAAAFA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Z1HcMf9jyF4FcyWCI7VS4AAAAFA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Z1HcMf9jyF4FcyWCI7VS4AAAAFA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Z1HcMf9jyF4FcyWCI7VS4AAAAFA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Z1HcMf9jyF4FcyWCI7VS4AAAAFA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2023/04/12/uk_standalone_5g_2023/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2024/11/12/cma_vodafone_three_remedies/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2024/11/13/ofcom_mmwave_spectrum_auction/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2024/11/12/cma_vodafone_three_remedies/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2024/11/05/uk_regulator_hints_vodathree_merger/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/09/vodafone_three_merger_remedies/
[13] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
I felt so free when I finally quit Vodafone.
PlusNet stopped doing mobile a while ago & shunted customers onto EE.
Plusnet has also pretty much stopped doing support...
In the last three years...
Nothing has improved.
A bad outcome for consumers...
.. but I suspect Stuart McIntosh as a high paying position lined up at Voda3.
If the promise to behave for 3 years.
The fable of the scorpion and the frog comes to mind…
Regulators and watchdogs must be the most optimistic people on the planet. They strike me as the time of people to look at the black clouds above them in the morning on a cold December day and insist on wearing a t-shirt and shorts because they feel it'll be summer soon.
Gobshites.
To be fair to the regulators - they're subject to legal scrutiny. You can't just say that "I can tell by the pricking of my thumbs that you're a lying cheating bunch of shysters who won't stick to a deal." If you do, a court will strike that down and make you take your decision again. You have to find proper grounds for refusing to allow a merger. Added to that, you're also restricted by your charter and the law that you're implementing - which may have been badly drafted.
On the other hand, the CMA does have the power to launch investigations into industries to see if they're using predatory pricing.
Personally I think the CMA has done a pretty decent job of regulating mergers, since it got all its new shiny powers after Brexit. But that's only half the job. What it hasn't yet done in some big investigation into ongoing dodgy practices in an indusry and wielded the big stick. That's got to be the next proof that it's up to the job. Hopefully it can do better than Ofcom. Admittedly not a high bar to clear. I think the European Competition Commissioner has over-stretched a bit of late - but in general I'd like to see the CMA be more like the EU than the US, but not too much.
FFS!!!
FFS. I left Vodafone and joined Three about 4 years ago due to them being totally sh**e. Now I'm going to be back where I started :-(
A lose-lose for consumers here. Still, profits, eh?
That said, I don't have to be with Vodafone, there are options here in Portugal that Voda don't own. For now, anyway.
‘Legally-binding commitments’, yes? Sounds good!
So, hypothetically, and, of course these things never happen in real life, but just suppose; that said ‘commitments’ never happen? Are the current and future executives of both companies hauled up in Court, subject to question under oath, and ordered to personally pay $massive_fine; or is the company fined, the executives express how ‘disappointed they are with the ruling' and promptly pass the cost onto their customers (assuming, of course, that they still have any by then)?
Yes, I know, it’s a tough question to answer - but does anyone have any predictions?
This should work like Openreach where the combined infrastructure is managed separately. Vodafone and Three can be MVNOs on the same basis as any other virtual operator.
I hope Vodafone have improved since we left them and went to Three 5 years ago!
Will they keep the current Three platform going? Like Plusnet are still Plusnet even though owned by BT.