News: 1732091652

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Study suggests X turned right just in time for election season

(2024/11/20)


A pair of researchers say they've determined that July 13 was likely the day that X, formerly known as Twitter, made platform-level algorithm changes that increased the visibility of posts made by Elon Musk and Republican-leaning accounts in the run-up to the US election.

That date may stick out in the memory as when Elon Musk, now the owner of X, formally endorsed Donald Trump in the recent US presidential election.

Coincidence? Perhaps not, according to a [1]working paper shared by Timothy Graham and Mark Andrejevic of Queensland University of Technology. The pair examined posts made by Musk, Republican-leaning accounts, and Democrat-leaning accounts between January 1 and October 25, noting that July 13 appeared to be the day the tide turned red on X.

[2]

Their research was split into two phases, one looking at the prominence of Musk's posts pushed to users through features like the default "For You" feed, and the other comparing the prominence of Republican- or Democrat-aligned posts.

[3]

[4]

Graham and Andrejevic observed an increase in all metrics for Musk's posts on the platform from mid-July onward. These included views, retweets, and favorites.

Equally, the pair add, Republican-leaning posts were found to have enjoyed a more significant boost in terms of their visibility to users, and engagements were also vastly higher than those on Democrat-leaning posts, although both sides saw fairly even increases. Republican-leaning posts started off with markedly higher counts on all metrics to start with, however.

[5]

For the Republican-Democrat section of the analysis, Republicans' posts were viewed and engaged with more frequently before the July 13 changes, but after that date, their visibility shot up in comparison to Democrat posts, and both sides saw equal increases in engagements.

The pair's analysis found Musk's posts already had "substantially higher baseline view counts" compared to other users, but this saw a noticeable additional jump on July 13, one that increased steadily in the following weeks before culminating in a massive spike at the end of October.

On average, between July 13 and October 25, the CEO's posts scored 138.27 percent more views than they did before. Other users' posts saw a less pronounced increase of 56.93 percent over the same period.

[6]

What followed was an even bigger increase in the number of retweets Musk's posts received – 237.94 percent after July 13. Other users also saw an increase, but only by 152.15 percent. Similar findings were made when looking at the number of times his posts were favorited.

"These findings underscore a distinct pattern that may indicate an algorithmic shift that disproportionately favored Musk's account, contributing to a considerable engagement advantage," the researchers noted. "This visibility bias, if linked to platform algorithm adjustments, highlights the impact of such structural changes on engagement dynamics and the potential for differential treatment among users.

"This outcome has broader implications for understanding how platform algorithms may shape public discourse by influencing which voices and content receive heightened visibility and interaction."

The findings also showed that Republican accounts started off with an average of 1.3 million more views compared to Democrat users and after the platform changes, Republican account posts received an additional 952,300 views per post.

According to the visualized data in the paper, Republican accounts received massive view count increases toward the end of October while those of Democrat accounts tailed off.

"We speculate that the view count findings suggest possible recommendation algorithm bias for visibility that privileges pro-Republican accounts, warranting further investigation to understand the mechanisms driving these algorithmic shifts," the researchers wrote.

"The findings may also be influenced by the significant boost that Elon Musk received to his engagement metrics following the structural break, which further research should examine."

Confirming suspicions

The findings echo those of the [7]Pew Research Center from June, which found X to be a more welcoming platform for those with Republican views than those that lean left.

[8]Bluesky capitalizes on X woes with funding and user growth

[9]X to allow third parties to train their AI models with social media users' data

[10]Elon Musk's X isn't important enough to feel the full force of EU regulation

[11]Elon Musk's X mashed by Australian court for evading child protection reporting

They also lend support for [12]anecdotal claims that the platform had become more right-wing, exposing users to more reactionary views than before [13]Musk was at the helm.

There were, of course, prominent voices saying the platform formerly known as Twitter was too left-leaning and stifled the voices of those on the other side. One of the voices was indeed the President-elect Donald Trump, who is set to lead the US for another four years starting in 2025.

If the findings of the research are to be believed, Trump is also the same person who may have benefited from the apparent platform-level changes made in the lead-up to [14]the election he just won .

As ever, we'd usually reach out to X for an official response to the study, but Musk pretty swiftly after taking control sacked the company's press team in favor of an auto-reply poop emoji for all incoming media requests. This was later replaced with "We'll get back to you soon," but that never happens.

Post-election exodus

Following the result of the US election earlier this month, many high-profile figures and organizations have announced their desertion of X in favor of other sites such as [15]Bluesky .

The Guardian newspaper is among the more famous brands to have officially exited the platform, calling it "toxic," while the likes of Ben Stiller and Jamie Lee Curtis are among the household Hollywood names to have also left.

Bluesky was created by none other than Twitter founder Jack Dorsey and describes itself as "social media as it should be."

Its popularity has surged in recent weeks, with up to 1 million people signing up to the site on a daily basis. Those with accounts will know it looks very similar to X, but feels more like how Twitter used to be ten years ago.

It's free of advertising, for now, and has no algorithmic post-pushing – just a feed full of posts from followed accounts appearing in chronological order.

For those interested in the platform, we vultures are flying high among the other Bluesky residents, and you can stay up to date with our latest cawings by following [16]our account . ®

Get our [17]Tech Resources



[1] https://eprints.qut.edu.au/253211/

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Zz3BVReb0I4Tip_FruDKhgAAABM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Zz3BVReb0I4Tip_FruDKhgAAABM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Zz3BVReb0I4Tip_FruDKhgAAABM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Zz3BVReb0I4Tip_FruDKhgAAABM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Zz3BVReb0I4Tip_FruDKhgAAABM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2024/06/12/how-x-users-view-experience-the-platform/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/28/bluesky_capitalizes_on_x_woes/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/18/x_train_data/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/17/eu_x_dma_regulation/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/04/x_loses_australian_child_safety_case/

[12] https://www.reddit.com/r/Twitter/comments/16w26jl/have_users_of_twitter_noticed_and_increase_in/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/31/musk_election_lottery_hearing/

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2024/11/07/top_10_billionaires/

[15] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/28/bluesky_capitalizes_on_x_woes/

[16] https://bsky.app/profile/theregister.com

[17] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



The poster Khaptain, here

Anonymous Coward

Has in the past posted about the Fascism being a good thing

Hmm

codejunky

I am not sure this can be much of a shock considering Twitter was exposed for shadow banning and removing posts that they and the government didnt agree with, to the extent of removing fact to promote lies. Even in trying to release the Twitter files Musk found a government plant editing the information before release and fired him.

So merely by not skewing left I would expect to see right wing posts being more prominent. They were happy to ban the President of the US while still providing a platform for known terrorists.

"The Guardian newspaper is among the more famous brands to have officially exited the platform"

From what I hear it was one of their most popular posts on the platform.

There is nothing illegal about...

chuckufarley

...using misinformation to sway voters. You can't use it to get a bank loan, or to drive up the price of a stock. You can't sell a product based on misinformation in its advertising, I.E. snake oil, but you can still sell snake oil legally today if you follow the Rules of Law. When it comes to voting, snake oil is what keeps the U.S. political machine running these days.

Re: There is nothing illegal about...

Anonymous Coward

Indeed. The misinformation from the democrat party pretty much lost them the election. They lost the trust of the voters. Heck even AOC said that people don't want to vote for someone who is fake.

Re: There is nothing illegal about...

chuckufarley

Wait a sec. If you are confident enough to post it, why aren't you posting under a confirmed account name? Why the AC? Are you that insecure about who you are? I live in a country where even a gay man can walk down the street with PRIDE so I put little stock in the mutterings of Anonymous Cowards.

Re: There is nothing illegal about...

Casca

Because almost all of the right wing morons post as AC. Just disregard

Re: There is nothing illegal about...

chuckufarley

I'm sorry but I disagree. Disregarding people posting nonsense will only lead to more nonsense being posted.

It's high time, that the lie "it's only user-content" goes away.

ComputerSays_noAbsolutelyNo

The feed shown to user's is obviously controlled by the algorithmic overlords, and thus is clearly the product of an editorial process.

Anonymous Coward

I only exist on Twitter to follow companies/people (I never post) Even in the Following tab, I'm not seeing all the posts from the accounts I follow.

Most of the people I follow have decamped to either Mastodon or Bluesky. Just need companies to start moving over.

Where will the Nazi firehose algorithm be turned on next?

Anonymous Coward

[1]So many countries to choose from and push rightwards...

Musk spent $44bn to turn Twitter into another irrelevant alt-right app like Truth Social, Parler, or Gab, the only difference is unlike the rest it's still relevant so more people may be susceptible to this nonsense. The best thing that can happen at this point is for every unaffected person, business, and media outlet to vote with their feet and abandon X for Bluesky, Threads, and/or Mastodon in an effort to hasten that irrelevancy and contain the disease.

[1] https://europeelects.eu/calendar/

Re: Where will the Nazi firehose algorithm be turned on next?

Anonymous Coward

I'm not sure that simply picking a different oligarch is the answer. And picking Mastodon would seem to be the triumph of hope over expectation.

Re: Where will the Nazi firehose algorithm be turned on next?

Anonymous Coward

"Bluesky, Threads, and/or Mastodon"

Ah, the echo chambers of left wing anger, hate and bigotry. Why would anyone want to go there unless they are mentally ill.

Re: Where will the Nazi firehose algorithm be turned on next?

Casca

And another moronic AC post

Is this the correct conclusion to draw from the data available?

Andy The Hat

I'm not sure about this.

The fact that Musk endorsed Trump would naturally attract more right (in the American sense) leaning support and was probably a significant contribution towards those increased exposure statistics. But the argument presented is that the increased exposure *artificially* increased on the day he endorsed Trump. I'm not sure the paper differentiates or, without inside information, could differentiate between the two scenarios. Once the ball was rolling, the retweets etc follow and is the way X works - publicity creating publicity.

Re: Is this the correct conclusion to draw from the data available?

Zolko

@ Andy : these were also my doubts

A pair of researchers say they've determined that July 13 was likely the day that ...

did these researchers ever hear about " correlation is not causation " ? If 13-th of july was the date Musk announced his endorsement of Trump, then it would be logical that some sort of online social movement started that day which led to the change in results in the – may-be same – algorithm.

graemep

I was thinking about the same.

However, one solid bias is that Musk's posts are being shown more - but we knew that already so this paper is not really showing something new.

The other thing is that "left" leaning people have been leaving Twitter.

Elon Moscow

elsergiovolador

When my friend started reporting Russian disinformation, he got his account suspended.

So there you go, freeze peach :-)

The Great Movie Posters:

SHE TOOK ON A WHOLE GANG! A howling hellcat humping a hot steel hog
on a roaring rampage of revenge!
-- Bury Me an Angel (1972)

WHAT'S THE SECRET INGREDIENT USED BY THE MAD BUTCHER FOR HIS SUPERB SAUSAGES?
-- Meat is Meat (1972)

TODAY the Pond!
TOMORROW the World!
-- Frogs (1972)