Viable fusion power in a decade? Tokamak Energy dares to dream
- Reference: 1729095314
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2024/10/16/tokamak_fusion_pilot/
- Source link:
The Oxfordshire-based company gave an overview of its early design workflow for the US Fusion Development Program at the 66th Annual Meeting of the [1]American Physical Society (APS) Division of Plasma Physics in Atlanta, Georgia, last week.
This milestone-based development program was established by DOE as a competition, with the aim of pushing private companies to bring fusion energy production toward technical and commercial viability.
[2]
It's a running joke among scientists that [3]fusion power generation is 30 years away , and always will be, but if this DOE project comes to fruition, viable technology could be expected in about a decade, although it will take much longer to commercialize. However, reaching that goal is a long way off.
[4]
[5]
In a presentation at the event, Tokamak's assistant chief engineer, Erik Mårtensson, detailed the company's contribution to the program. It aims to deliver a pre-conceptual design for a fusion pilot plant based on a high-field spherical tokamak with high-temperature superconducting magnets.
Tokamak Energy last month said it was [6]forming a separate division to commercialize the superconducting magnet technology it has developed for reactor projects such as this one.
[7]
The pilot plant is estimated to be capable of generating 800 MW of fusion power and 85 MW of net electricity, which the company claims would be enough to power and heat more than 70,000 American homes.
Tokamak says it has completed Workflow Phase 1, which was to narrow down the design parameters for the fusion pilot plant from the "extremely large solution space" that exists. This involved iterating the design using PyTOK, its internally developed systems code. The second phase aims to progress from this to a pre-concept/concept design.
[8]Magnetic personalities at Tokamak Energy form separate division
[9]ITER delays first plasma for world's biggest fusion power rig by a decade
[10]Joint European Torus experiments end on a 69 megajoules high
[11]World's largest nuclear fusion reactor comes online in Japan
Initial parameters are for the tokamak to have an aspect ratio of 2.0, making it more spherical than donut-shaped, with a major radius of 4.25 meters and a magnetic field of 4.25 Tesla, as well as a liquid lithium tritium breeding blanket.
The plant will include a complete set of Tokamak's latest high-temperature superconducting (HTS) magnets to confine and control the superheated plasma formed from the deuterium and tritium hydrogen fuel.
[12]
What the future fusion reactor might look like (artist's impression – click to enlarge) – Image via Tokamak Energy
Tokamak Energy president Michael Ginsberg claimed the presentation of the first design details caused great excitement at the APS conference.
"We are delighted by the reception from an expert crowd and energized in our mission to demonstrate net power from this pilot plant in the mid-2030s, paving the way for globally deployable carbon-free fusion energy. We now look forward to working with our partners in the US to evolve and progress this design," he said in a statement.
It's a project worth pursuing. As Tokamak points out, generating stations powered by fusion would provide clean energy to towns, cities, and industry. One kilogram of fusion fuel releases the same amount of energy as burning around 10 million kilograms of coal, but without the greenhouse gas emissions, the company says.
[13]
Nuclear fusion also does not create long-lived radioactive waste, unlike the nuclear fission plants that many technology companies are [14]investigating as potential power sources for their expanding datacenter networks. ®
Get our [15]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.aps.org/
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZxA3iBeb0I4Tip_FruDRjgAAAAc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://www.discovermagazine.com/technology/why-nuclear-fusion-is-always-30-years-away
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZxA3iBeb0I4Tip_FruDRjgAAAAc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZxA3iBeb0I4Tip_FruDRjgAAAAc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2024/09/03/tokamak_energy_magnet_spinoff/
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZxA3iBeb0I4Tip_FruDRjgAAAAc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2024/09/03/tokamak_energy_magnet_spinoff/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/04/iter_new_baseline_project_delays/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2024/02/09/jets_swansong_yields_fusion_record/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/04/jt_60sa_tokamak_online/
[12] https://regmedia.co.uk/2024/10/16/tokamak_oct_2024.jpg
[13] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZxA3iBeb0I4Tip_FruDRjgAAAAc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/15/google_kairos_smr_nuclear_investment/
[15] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Within a factor of two anyway
I'm more worried about where the other 715MW of fusion power goes...
Re: Within a factor of two anyway
That is for district heating - more common in Europe than USA. The big problem is what to do with the waste heat in Summer.
Re: Within a factor of two anyway
You can drive air con from a district heating system in summer, using absorption coolers. This approach is not very efficient and for commercial viability relies on the fact that many district heat systems are willing to almost give the heat away in summer, or that the local electricity network is heavily constrained and simply can't supply the power for masses of conventional air conditioners.
Re: Within a factor of two anyway
The advantage of district heating is that it works very well in highly dense urban centers with large numbers of apartment towers all under the control of a single central authority and clustered around a central nuclear power plant = the American suburban dream
Re: Within a factor of two anyway
>I'm more worried about where the other 715MW of fusion power goes...
Maybe I've grasped the wrong end of the stick, but I interpreted the numbers in the article as "the reactor will generate 800MW of power, but need 715MW of input power to achieve & contain fusion, leaving a net gain of 85MW" ...?
Re: Within a factor of two anyway
No, heating will come from the 10x more cooling water.
Fabulous progress...
They've managed to get from "Fusion power will be available in 30 years" to "Fusion power will be available in 10 years"...
Within a factor of two anyway
"85 MW of net electricity, which the company claims would be enough to power and heat more than 70,000 American homes."
So 1KW per American home?
Single detached family homes in the USA use 16KWh/year = 2KW average power, and that's not including any gas heating or charging EVs
Hopefully the rest of their plan for commercial fusion power is more realistic