First time's the charm: SpaceX catches a descending Super Heavy Booster
- Reference: 1728863173
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2024/10/13/first_time_success_spacexs_mechazilla/
- Source link:
The flight was [1]the fifth for SpaceX's monster rocket, which comprises the Super Heavy Booster and the payload-carrying Starship itself. It came a day after the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued a license modification authorizing the launch from SpaceX's facility in Boca Chica, Texas.
The license authorized a mission that would see Starship reach sub-orbital altitude, before re-entering and making a water landing in the Indian Ocean, and the catch attempt by arms dubbed Mechazilla on the launch tower. It also included exceptions if things didn't go well – such as Starship failing to handle the heat of re-entry, under which circumstance SpaceX was allowed to conduct an uncontrolled landing provided the FAA was notified first.
[2]
However, the exceptions were not needed. To the clear surprise of SpaceX staffers, Mechazilla caught the spent Super Heavy Booster. The excitement caused by the sight of the Super Heavy Booster descending for an unprecedented first catch was reminiscent of the early Falcon 9 landings.
[3]
[4]
The Super Heavy Booster used 33 Raptor engines during the launch phase, then throttled back to use just three as Starship fired its own engines. Ten Raptors were then briefly relit to send the Booster back towards solid ground, and 13 blazed to slow the rocket for the catch. Three engines fired up to fine-tune the trajectory before Mechazilla grasped the 70-meter, 270,000kg booster.
[5]Top-secret X-37B space plane ready for daring new orbital maneuverer
[6]Tesla's big reveal: Steering-wheel-free Robotaxi will charge wirelessly
[7]Starlink was offered for free to those hit by Hurricane Helene. It is not entirely free
[8]SpaceX accuses 'meme-stock' rival of 'misinformation' over Starlink signals waiver
SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell [9]was left speechless by the feat. In between praising SpaceX and its engineers, Elon Musk also used the event to criticize regulators – [10]commenting that getting the license "was the limiting factor" and "it will get far worse, potentially impossible, if the slow strangulation by overregulation continues!"
The Super Heavy Booster appeared in good shape as it hung from the mechanical arms of the launch tower. Musk [11]noted : "Some of the outer engine nozzles are a little warped from high heating & strong aero forces. Easily fixable."
Having demonstrated that catching the Super Heavy Booster was possible, SpaceX then demonstrated the improvements made to the heat shielding and controllability of Starship as the spacecraft re-entered Earth's atmosphere and made a soft landing in the Indian Ocean.
[12]
On the previous mission, flaps used to control the vehicle were damaged. While there were still issues on this flight, they appear to have been far smaller – the Starship appeared to fare much better and splashed down in its target area. The accuracy was underlined by the capturing of the event (and subsequent expected explosion) by a buoy at the site. Musk [13]posted : "Ship landed precisely on target! Second of the two objectives achieved."
The FAA's license for Flight 5 includes authorization for Flight 6 – although the regulator warned that it may need to revisit the approval if plans for the next mission change.
Considering the success of Flight 5, it seems likely that the SpaceX team will continue to push the envelope. One of the commentators mentioned a possible recovery of Starship in the near future.
[14]
NASA administrator Bill Nelson [15]offered his congratulations on the achievement. The US space agency is depending on SpaceX and Starship for the first crewed lunar landing attempt of the Artemis program. ®
Get our [16]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.spacex.com/launches/mission/?missionId=starship-flight-5
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZwyXaTfmiQq7f-id6ODmBQAAARM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZwyXaTfmiQq7f-id6ODmBQAAARM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZwyXaTfmiQq7f-id6ODmBQAAARM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/12/x37b_space_plane/
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/11/tesla_robotaxi_robovan_arrive/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/08/free_starlink_hurricane_helene/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/04/spacex_ast_spacemobile_dispute/
[9] https://x.com/Gwynne_Shotwell/status/1845447217982865501
[10] https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1845470272327164073
[11] https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1845483651590389863
[12] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZwyXaTfmiQq7f-id6ODmBQAAARM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[13] https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1845458392531529991
[14] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZwyXaTfmiQq7f-id6ODmBQAAARM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[15] https://x.com/SenBillNelson/status/1845461454977196294
[16] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Just fail until you succeed, right?
Everything about the test looked ridiculous and I simply assumed it was going wrong, right up until the moment it went almost perfectly right...
The Guardian put up a highlights reel from launch to catch [1]here .
A full copy of the SpaceX stream including the simulated ship landing in the Indian Ocean is [2]here .
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twmWOseADQQ
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfuxxqc5yaI
Must break those engineer's hearts working for that moron..
Sincere kudos to those involved.
I will admit that this cynical 50 year old actually shed a tear watching the booster come back down from space and make that final lateral adjustment back into the arms of mechzilla.
Most gripping thing I’ve ever seen…
Just wait until you watch it again.
For any of you that did watch the SpaceX stream, I suggest you watch the launch and landing sequences that Everyday Astronaut broadcast. Their ground camera was quite distant from the SpaceX tracking camera and the view was equally, if not more, spectacular from their angle.
Another thought is that I can't wait to see if Trevor Mahlmann was photographing this launch and landing...the man has vision and talent.
To the Moon and Mars
There's no chopsticks on the moon or Mars. This seems like an earth-only gimmick just like the landing falcon9 on a barge or land. From a cost perspective and labour perspective it might be cheaper and faster to just use and throwaway the boosters instead of wasteful mission targets like catching a flaming boomstick from midair. More expensive and more complex and more Swiss cheese.
Re: To the Moon and Mars
What's the line from that song? "90 minutes from New York to Paris, well, by 76 we'll be A.O.K." We're much closer than we were when it was written.
Can you imagine leaving Heathrow for Christchurch and arriving in 70 minutes? I can.
Kudo indeed to the engineers
Nothing more needs said about Elmo. The engineers are the real heroes here.
You paying attention Boeing? You're getting pwned hard.