Thanks, Edward Snowden: you propelled China to quantum networking leadership
- Reference: 1725946212
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2024/09/10/china_quantum_innovation_itif_report/
- Source link:
So says think thank the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation (ITIF), which on Monday [1]published a report titled "How Innovative Is China in Quantum?"
Its answer is "very" – at least when it comes to quantum communication, a field president Xi Jinping prioritized after the 2013 Snowden leaks so that Beijing can keep more of its secrets.
[2]
"Since then, China has been moving swiftly, solidifying its lead in the global race for secure communications, particularly in QKD [quantum key distribution], which is perhaps the most advanced subfield of secure communications, leveraging the principles of quantum mechanics to create a virtually unbreakable method of encrypting data," the report states.
[3]
[4]
"China has the most ambitious demonstrations of this technology, namely through what is called the Beijing-Shanghai backbone, which is the longest QKD network in the world and stretches over 1,200 miles using fiber-optic cables," the ITIF report adds. China also operates the "Micius" satellite that, according to the report, "demonstrated the potential to build a global quantum internet – a network that would use quantum technology to transmit information in a way that is far more secure than today's internet, protecting data from being intercepted or tampered with."
The report states that other nations can't match China's quantum comms capabilities, but the rest of the world is ahead in quantum computing.
[5]
"In hardware development, the United States has taken a commanding lead over China," the report observes, calling out work on superconductors, and the ability to trap atomic ions in a vacuum to represent qubits, as fields in which the US leads the world.
The US and allied nations also excel at developing quantum algorithms – the foundation of software to run in quantum computers.
China has made some important advances on superconducting quantum chips, but trails badly on quantum algorithms.
[6]US tightens export controls on quantum kit and chips for China, Iran, Russia
[7]China is beating the world at scientific research, think tank finds
[8]NIST finalizes trio of post-quantum encryption standards
[9]Open source AI helped China catch up to the world, researchers reckon
The two superpowers are at roughly the same level of development in the field of quantum sensing – a tech that allows observation of minute events and is thought to be important in using quantum computers to help with tasks like developing new medicines or materials.
The report suggests that the state of quantum tech development reflects nations' differing priorities.
[10]
China has focussed on tangible products and worked hard to get innovations out of the lab – often after government forges links between academia and industry.
Which is how it's possible to link Edward Snowden and the Micius satellite.
The US, by contrast, has not made quantum tech a national security or competitiveness priority. It been content to see basic research lead to applied research, and only then to commercial products.
"It's a step-by-step process that can be slow and disjointed, with each stage often handled by different entities," the report explains. "In contrast, China's approach is designed for speed and efficiency. The country's strategy centralizes efforts and streamlines the transition from research to application."
Given the potential importance of quantum tech, the think tank recommends "The United States should approach quantum technology as a critical national security and economic imperative, not just a scientific pursuit."
"While the United States fosters open innovation, China's protectionist stance on its own advances creates an asymmetric knowledge-sharing environment. This imbalance risks the United States becoming a global quantum research hub while China dominates commercialization."
The US has in recent years imposed many sanctions that prevent China from importing advanced tech, but the Foundation argues more of the same may be self-defeating.
"Export controls are vital for safeguarding quantum technologies from misuse, [but] policymakers should apply them judiciously to avoid hindering both innovation and international collaboration," the report argues. "Quantum R&D is a global endeavor, with advancements and supply chains spread across multiple countries. Imposing broad, unilateral export controls could backfire, isolating the United States from key global partnerships and stifling the flow of talent and ideas crucial for progress."
The think tank suggests "targeted controls that address specific risks without broadly limiting the exchange of knowledge and components."
"These measures should be developed in close coordination with allies to ensure that they are both effective and aligned with global market dynamics. By striking a balance between security and collaboration, the United States can protect its interests while continuing to lead in quantum innovation." ®
Get our [11]Tech Resources
[1] https://itif.org/publications/2024/09/09/how-innovative-is-china-in-quantum/
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZuAYxSonb2P5fVKwFPcGagAAAc4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZuAYxSonb2P5fVKwFPcGagAAAc4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZuAYxSonb2P5fVKwFPcGagAAAc4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZuAYxSonb2P5fVKwFPcGagAAAc4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2024/09/06/us_rolls_out_new_export/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/30/aspi_technology_tracker/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/14/nist_postquantum_standards/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/29/asia_tech_news_roundup/
[10] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZuAYxSonb2P5fVKwFPcGagAAAc4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[11] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Not Snowden
Snowden is not the problem, pride is .
The Americans considered themselves at the forefront of everything for so long that their pride gave way to lackadaisical ignorance.
Never forget that the same amount of intelligent people exist in China too except that their government is pushing to get ahead rather than remaining all high and mighty on its laurels.
America is splitting itself apart, it will very soon become a extremely divided nation. The glue that held it together has been lost by corporate greed and individualism.
Re: Not Snowden
In the US, half the population does not believe in facts nor Science. Entire Universities, like Liberty University, teach Creationism as Science.
https://www.liberty.edu/arts-sciences/creation-studies/
https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-liberty-university-creates-creationists
Re: Not Snowden
"half the population does not believe in facts nor Science"
Understandable considering science and facts are wrong, [1]more than half of the time .
[1] https://www.amazon.co.uk/Half-Life-Facts-Everything-Expiration/dp/159184651X
Re: Not Snowden
"half the population does not believe in facts nor Science"
A statement which ironically ironically a complete fallacy ... belief infers a lack of knowledge.
Science is a process not a belief system (except if you watch Sabine Hossenfelder's recent obliteration of some dodgy papers which do look more like belief and hope that nobody will read them before the next grant cheque arrives).
Facts are the current state of knowledge, not a belief.
Thinking The Great God Malcolm created penquins while on holiday in Torremolinos is a belief. Thinking that Margaret on Facebook (cleaner at Sainsburys and part time expert in global pandemics) can cure Covid by reading your aura on-line and chanting in the bath for the small fee of £499 is a belief.
You cannot believe in Science. You cannot believe in facts. But you can choose to ignore both and believe ignorance is bliss.
.
Re: Not Snowden
There is science and there is scientism. Phones Sheridan is talking about Scientism.
Re: same amount of intelligent people
Given the sizes of each population, surely more intelligent people will live in China.
Re: same amount of intelligent people
Not only does China have more intelligent people in China, it also provides some of the best academics working in universities in US and Europe.
Re: Not Snowden
Well, that's about the most asinine thing I have ever read. America unglued because of individualism? America is individualism.
Am I right that "quantum comms" refers to being able to send an encryption key over long distances in a way such that, if anyone has looked at it or tampered with, that can be detected? Which avoids the risk of a man in the middle?
"Am I right that "quantum comms" refers to being able to send an encryption key over long distances in a way such that, if anyone has looked at it or tampered with, that can be detected? Which avoids the risk of a man in the middle?"
Yes ... and no (and that's not meant to be a Schrödinger pun). "Quantum Comms" is a phrase that means different things to different people. Yes it can mean exactly what you just said, including the subsequent non-quantum communications that use that key. The idea being that regular encryption is sufficient for privacy so long as you can be sure the key hasn't been intercepted.
It can also mean using the same quantum enabled channel to pass the comms messages themselves, rather than just the key. The downside of that is that currently, quantum methods of communication are slow compared to regular comms.
For the example given, I'd have thought that the link running from one part of a police state to another was also a substantial mitigation of the risk. Older technologies, such as sending a courier, would also be applicable to the key distribution problem.
Is it perhaps possible that the US has no comparable link because, in their considered opinion, they have better things to do with the money?
For That and Those Everywhere East and West ... with Future Desires that Need to Know
"Quantum R&D is a global endeavor, with advancements and supply chains spread across multiple countries.” ..... says think thank the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation (ITIF)
What you are yet to widely accept is fully realised, and wisest best engaged with as an exceptional expanding treat rather than being feared as an existential threat to be gravely regarded and avoided, is Quantum R&D is a universal enterprise, with advancements and supply chains readily available but naturally protected by Advanced IntelAIgent Design to be provided and administered, mentored and monitored by ....... well, a select body of an alien few would not be a fake falsehood and perfectly appropriate APT* and out of this world descriptor.
APT* ....... Advanced Persistent Treat/Threat
Does Toshiba get a mention in the report?
This article from last year:
https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/06/hsbc_vodafone_quantum_security/
notes that a QKD distribution network is on a 3-year trial in London, using commercially available hardware from Toshiba. Toshiba Europe have been working on quantum secure networks for about 30 years now.
You can't give Snowden credit for something China did in their own best interest. The US was simply caught in a global spying network, PRISM, and China doubled down to protect themselves. Take personal politics out of it and China only did what any country would do if they seek to protect their own interests. Of course, politically, one could go on all day about that......
It will be another trumped up charge they put on Snowden’s charge sheet to encourage a plea bargain and thus a “conviction”…
China would have assumed what was happening without Snowden. The only revelation was to the public.
Lock up your ... secrets
> China has made some important advances on superconducting quantum chips, but trails badly on quantum algorithms.
Well, since they are miles ahead in Quantum security, maybe they have loads more quantum tech. Its just that the americans can't hack into their systems to discover what they've got.
ITIF gets loads of funding from tech industry groups
not the first time they have come out with a story like this - to encourage more spending monies for the "tech bro's" who pay their mortgages/rent
pure non story, total baloney ... nothing to see here
PS Is it me but ever since the register became more US centric they just publish baloney stories like this verbatim without any real critical analysis, leaving it to the commentators, bit sad
So, the private conversations of foreign heads of state are now considered 'abstract knowledge'???
Grow up.