News: 1725471010

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Firefox 130 lands with a yawn, but 131 beta teases a long-awaited feature

(2024/09/04)


Firefox 130 is landing on users' machines, while version 131 enters beta — with a feature we've all been waiting for.

[1]The latest version of Firefox is here, less than a month after its predecessor – which was chiefly notable because it got not one but two [2]bug-fix releases . (And yes, we do know that Firefox 128 is already [3]up to its third , but that's different. As [4]we said in July , version 128 is an extended support release, so it has about another year ahead of it.)

Version 130 is not a hugely exciting release, in The Reg FOSS desk's humble opinion. It's the new beta that's a bit more interesting, but we'll get to that.

[5]

The new current version has two notable features. Firefox is getting smarter about handling discrete blocks of text within a web page, and a visible aspect is that 130 supports partial translations of web pages. Just over a year ago, [6]Firefox's in-browser translation became available if you tweaked its settings. In [7]version 118 , translation was enabled by default.

[8]

Firefox 131's new Settings page, in a vertical tab, alongside a picture-in-picture video. - Click to enlarge

The thing is that the real human world is messy, and it's quite common to encounter a web page that's mostly in one language, but contains bits that are in another. If you don't speak either of those languages, that's a problem. So now, after Firefox 130 translates a web page from one language to your preferred one, you can now highlight a block of text and translate just that bit to or from something else.

Under Settings, there's also a new Labs page, which lets you enable experimental features. This reminds us of the [9]comparable feature in Gmail , which sadly disappeared about three years ago, taking selective quoting in email replies with it. For now, Firefox 130's experimental features are one we'll never use, and one we probably won't want. You can add a so-called AI Chatbot feature in a sidebar for all your automated plagiarism needs – and if you switch tabs away from one playing a video, the video can automatically shrink into a picture-in-picture mode and follow you.

[10]

There are some other, less visible changes, too. There's Curve25519 encryption support, which we'd never heard of, but if [11]Daniel J Bernstein approves of it then it's probably a good thing. For us mere mortals, Firefox can now randomly generate and suggest secure passwords, which sounds great – so long as you use a password manager to remember them for you.

The cool new thing we've been waiting to see is in the beta of the forthcoming [12]Firefox 131 . This offers tab previews when you hover the pointer over a tab, and not mentioned in the release notes, it may be able to block cookie banners, which would be handy. The feature we liked best is the integrated [13]vertical tabs support . For us, this worked well in testing. Like the default one in the [14]new forked Zen browser , the sidebar defaults to being tiny and only showing page icons, but that's enough to make it very useful.

[15]

This is doable in current versions via a choice of extensions, but [16]as we described back in 2022 , you also have to mess around enabling user CSS customization, adding your own stylesheet and so on to make it look nice. Now, it's just there, a few clicks away.

It's good to see Mozilla making some slightly more significant changes to its flagship product. Firefox's market share is tiny these days, but then, so is that of Linux on the desktop – and yet, it's a very significant player all the same, especially via Chromebooks. Size, as they say, is no guarantee of strength. More power to the lizard's elbow.

Get our [17]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/130.0/releasenotes/

[2] https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/129.0.2/releasenotes/

[3] https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/128.0.3/releasenotes/

[4] https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/11/firefox_128_new_esr/

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZtjYgaB_RdoT8WhwYRyD6AAAAZE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/31/firefox_117/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2023/09/29/mozilla_asleep_at_wheel/e

[8] https://regmedia.co.uk/2024/09/04/firefox_131_beta.jpg

[9] https://gmail.googleblog.com/2008/06/introducing-gmail-labs.html

[10] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZtjYgaB_RdoT8WhwYRyD6AAAAZE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[11] https://cr.yp.to/ecdh.html

[12] https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/131.0beta/releasenotes/

[13] https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/2024/08/07/firefox-sidebar-and-vertical-tabs-try-them-out-in-nightly-firefox-labs-131/

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2024/09/02/zen_firefox_fork_alpha/

[15] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZtjYgaB_RdoT8WhwYRyD6AAAAZE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[16] https://www.theregister.com/2022/09/26/firefox_power_user_guide

[17] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



fnusnu

Zoom and reflow on Android? I'll stick with Opera

Anonymous Coward

Opera on any platform? I'll stick with Firefox

fnusnu

You'll be changing your tune when you need reading glasses...

I'd drop Opera in a flash if Firefox did zoom

and reflow but for reasons best known only to themselves they can't or won't

David 132

As the most viable alternative to the Chrom* hegemony, I'm most certainly sticking with Firefox. I've never noticed the memory-usage or performance issues that are the most frequently-levelled criticisms; I've been using FF since its inception and I twitch when forced to use just about anything else.

The one annoyance that riles me - irrationally, I know - is that on Linux, if FF is updated in the background by the package manager, the running instance of FF then refuses to load new tabs and demands to be closed and restarted.

Yes, I know there are perfectly sound and logical technical reasons for that behaviour. And I can't think of a better alternative given the way the OS and the package manager work.

But I can still bitch and complain, right?

Yankee Doodle Doofus

< "But I can still bitch and complain, right?"

Yes indeed. It's a fundamental right of all people. I'm not sure I could get through a single day otherwise.

biddibiddibiddibiddi

If WINDOWS can manage to let you continue to use the browser until you completely close it, so that the files get updated on the next startup, why can't Linux?

biddibiddibiddibiddi

So websites were legally required to start showing cookie banners because people complained about cookies automatically happening, but browsers will now automatically block the banners, so how does that affect the rights of the user and the site when it comes to cookies? (I know there are add-ons that will do it already but people have to go out of their way to get those.) Are you considered to have accepted them if you block the banner and continue to use the site? Does blocking it mean the cookies are enabled because the code that lets you disagree didn't run? Not all sites even have options in the banners like "limit cookies to those necessary" or "I don't accept cookies" and if you don't click a specific link in the banner to go to a cookie selection page, closing the banner or just leaving it open means you accepted the cookies.

Nice curves

Androgynous Cupboard

Curve25519 is for encryption what Ed25519 is for digital signatures, and Ed25519 is definitely my favourite signature algorithm, which surprises me because I didn’t think I had one: short keys, very fast, predictable cipher text length, very strong, and resistant to (last time I looked) all current approaches used in channel attacks.

Re: Nice curves

David 132

> and Ed25519 is definitely my favourite signature algorithm,

Personally I'll stick with Ed209.

"Sign this email! You have 30 seconds to comply! You have 25 seconds to comply!" ...etc...

It's an older standard, but it certainly gets results.

"Arthur felt at a bit of a loss. There was a whole Galaxy
of stuff out there for him, and he wondered if it was
churlish of him to complain to himself that it lacked just
two things: the world he was born on and the woman he
loved. "