Prior UK goverment planned £485M four-year budget for Palantir-based healthcare system
- Reference: 1724236210
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2024/08/21/conservative_palantir_nhs_budget/
- Source link:
Pre-election plans for the Federated Data Platform (FDP) reveal the extent of the former Conservative government's spending plans around technology from the US spy-tech software company.
In December last year, NHS England awarded a [1]seven-year £330 million contract to Palantir , stating it would invest £25.6 million in the platform in the first year. The deal was initially tendered as a five-year contract with a two-year extension option, with a maximum value of up to £480 million.
[2]
The non-departmental public body also awarded a separate three-year contract for NHS Privacy Enhancing Technology (NHS-PET) to IQVIA, a healthcare technology and consulting firm. The value of that deal was not disclosed.
[3]
[4]
Documents from NHS England's FDP Programme Board – seen by The Register – reveal a planned £485 million rolling budget for the project over four years. The figure includes £340 million in revenue spending and £145 million in capital for the financial years 23/24 to 26/27 inclusive.
The figures, presented at the meeting in March, show the total budget for the first year of £122.3 million, made up of £85.4 million in revenue and £36.9 million in capital expenditure.
[5]
NHS England has yet to respond to The Register's request for comment on whether spending plans had been changed, or are set to change given the election of a new Labour government in July and pressure on public spending.
[6]Labour wins race to lead UK, but few would envy the load in its tech in-tray
[7]UK public voice fear over security in NHS data systems
[8]KPMG bags £8.5M NHS gig as cheerleader for Federated Data Platform rollout
[9]UK health department republishes £330M Palantir contract with fewer ██████
The procurement and conception of the FDP have been beset by controversy.
In March, NHS England published a less-redacted version of the Palantir contract [10]following legal pressure from the campaign group Good Law Project . The project is also under [11]legal pressure from four campaign groups – Foxglove; the Doctors' Association UK; the National Pensioners' Convention; and patient organization Just Treatment – which plan to challenge the legal basis for collecting data from hospital trusts and GP surgeries in the FDP.
Although NHS England maintains that the procurement of the FDP system has been a fair and open competition, critics claim Palantir was given an unfair advantage because of its role in building a similar COVID-era system, some use cases from which will be carried over to the FDP.
In total, NHS England [12]awarded Palantir £60 million without outside competition . It began with the US supplier offering its services under a £1 contract in the early stages of the pandemic. Palantir went on to win business worth £1 million ($1.25 million), then a £23 million ($28.7 million) contract was signed in December 2020, again without competition. More recent extension deals were arranged to cover the period running up to the FDP contract award. ®
Get our [13]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2023/11/22/palantir_wins_nhs_contract/
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/databases&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZsYPKed2hNwme6BLhQQlsQAAAMg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/databases&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZsYPKed2hNwme6BLhQQlsQAAAMg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/databases&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZsYPKed2hNwme6BLhQQlsQAAAMg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/databases&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZsYPKed2hNwme6BLhQQlsQAAAMg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/05/labour_tech_challenges/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2024/05/13/uk_public_nhs_data_survey/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2024/04/16/nhs_england_kpmg_fdp/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2024/03/25/nhs_palantir_contract_republished/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2024/03/25/nhs_palantir_contract_republished/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/01/nhs_palantir_legal_challenge/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2023/06/20/palantir_nhs_england_deal/
[13] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
The only difference is the hair style.
total corruption
needs cancelling yesterday
Re: total corruption
It's scary that anyone even though putting a straight-up Nazi like Peter Thiel anywhere near the NHS was an idea, let alone a good one. Those involved all need a very close inspection, because there is a strong stench here.
Re: total corruption
Odd that after his mouthpiece claimed we were the "first nuclear armed islamicist state" - that he would want to provide them with cutting edge intelligence software
Noddy level software purchase
If you are going to buy custom software then buy the source code. Copyright includes the concept of work for hire. If you hire the programmers, you can own the copyright unless sign away the rights. With the copyright for the source code you can put the next contract out for competitive bid. Without it, all other bidders have to include the cost of re-creating the code you already paid for. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me the same way multiple times per year for a decade and I must be an MP.
Re: Noddy level software purchase
A decade? My memory stretches 20 years back to the NHS Programme for IT.
They might as well just launch the money at the sun.
Re: Noddy level software purchase
It also make sense to hire team in-house. This way you don't waste public money on corporate profits.
Also not just the source code, but all the documentation, manuals, training materials and so on.
Software should also be portable, not tied to a specific platform and ideally open source (I would exclude defence and other sensitive areas) so that the public could scrutinise the delivery (after all the public pays for it).
Re: Noddy level software purchase
Ha, why do these suppliers always go to government, not the SME's or end users??
Far too easy to pull the wool over everyone's eyes if you're pitching to an MP, not the expert.
Re: Noddy level software purchase
SME don't have the resources to offer the sort of directorships that ministers need to make these decisions
Unfortunately, the current UK government are going to be unlikely to change course on this direction.