City council faces £216.5M loss over Oracle system debacle
- Reference: 1724142610
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2024/08/20/birmingham_oracle_cost/
- Source link:
Europe's largest local authority went live with the Oracle Fusion single platform for finance, payroll, HR, procurement, supply chain management, and customer relationship management – replacing an SAP system first introduced in 1997 – in April 2022.
Since its introduction, the council has been unable to file auditable accounts. It is set to re-implement an "out of the box" version of the solution after customizations in the first effort disrupted its bank reconciliation system. The system also left the council unable to provide an audit trail or detect fraud for 18 months.
[1]
The cost of the Oracle project increased from an [2]initial estimate of £19 million to a projected cost of £131 million , including the re-implementation.
[3]
[4]
However, [5]a fresh report from the Audit Reform Lab , a collective of academics, consultants, and activists based at the University of Sheffield, estimate the true cost of the Oracle implementation disaster is set to be £216.5 million until April 2026 as the council's spending plans had relied on expected costs savings from the ERP system, which it had later canceled.
"None of the anticipated direct savings were delivered, and, furthermore, due to the inability to monitor budgets, a significant amount of wider savings had to be written off. In total, £69m of savings in 2023/24 were written-off, along with unspecified further savings in future years," the report said. "Many of the internal processes and tacit knowledges that had previously been used to produce financial outputs broke down, providing no simple workarounds that would enable problems of this kind to be resolved."
[6]Europe's largest council could face £12M manual audit bill after Oracle project disaster
[7]Mega-city's Oracle system won't have effective cash management until 2025
[8]Brit council gives Oracle another £10M for professional services amid ERP fallout
[9]City council audit trail is an audit fail after disastrous Oracle ERP rollout
The report – commissioned by the GMB, Unison, and Unite unions – also claims that problems with the implementation were not disclosed to elected members and the wider public for more than a year.
"It appears that the widespread failure of the Oracle IT system, and the associated costs running into hundreds of millions of pounds, were not adequately disclosed to the cross-party democratic structures of the Council for around thirteen months, between April 2022 and May 2023," it stated.
[10]
The report calls for a public inquiry into the financial disaster, which saw the council become effectively bankrupt after news of a £760 million equal pay claim was disclosed. The report claims that figure was "prematurely disclosed and potentially overstated" while the role of Oracle was downplayed.
"Any subsequent inquiry should ask serious questions about why the failure of Oracle was downplayed by senior management at that time; and whether this was the result of intransigence and mismanagement, or was part of a deliberate strategy to deflect blame, or some other reason," it said.
In response, John Cotton, leader of Birmingham City Council, said: "We must take responsibility for the failings that have contributed to our current difficulties, but the mistakes made in Birmingham have not occurred in a vacuum. Report after report shows that there's a national crisis in local government caused by 14 years of neglect from the previous Tory government, combined with major rises in demand and cost-led pressures." ®
Get our [11]Tech Resources
[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/databases&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZsRpSICrCEaDy3krv7Os@wAAARI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[2] https://www.theregister.com/2024/02/22/europes_largest_local_authority_weighs/
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/databases&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZsRpSICrCEaDy3krv7Os@wAAARI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/databases&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZsRpSICrCEaDy3krv7Os@wAAARI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://auditreformlab.group.shef.ac.uk/downloads/bcc-report-4-08-24.pdf
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/18/europes_largest_council_could_face/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/17/birminghams_oracle_system_cash_management/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/08/oracle_professional_services_birmingham/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2024/04/25/birmingham_oracle_audit_trail/
[10] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/databases&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZsRpSICrCEaDy3krv7Os@wAAARI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[11] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
And if they ever get it up and running, the audits will start.
Good timing
Interesting that he pawns it off on the previous government now that they are not in power, where was this in previous years?
Re: Good timing
Indeed.
I fail to see how their ineptitude and inability to manage a major project can be blamed on central govt. if that body didn't say, you must use XYZ product with these exact customisations.
Hmm
Ah well its only taxpayers money. Plenty more money people are earning to tax
Easy Money for Oracle - same old BS gov't IT project
> "initial estimate of £19 million to a projected cost of £131 million"
Someone in Oracle got a new Ferrari as a bonus for that one. :D
Honestly it beggars belief how gov't (local or central) IT projects can f*ck up so badly, and I should know, I worked on one that similarly ballooned to £200M but was then cancelled.
It was a shit show when I joined mine (over budget and already late) and when I left 2 years later, very little had improved, in fact a full third of the 20,000 or so requirements hadn't even been allocated to a team to look at yet, and that was 5 years into a 3 year project!
"20,000 requirements" was the issue of course, as it was likely with this Oracle implementation for Birmingham, as every department in the council pushed for the system to do everything they could ever possibly wish for, for the next 20 years, probably without any ability to actually understand what they were asking for or its implication.
All the while Oracle consultants would be rubbing their hands together with glee saying: "Sure we can make it do that for you, let me just cost up that Change Request."
This is the perfect project for Oracle. They get paid near on 10x their initial bid, but don't actually have to deliver a system that works, and get to blame it all on the customer: "They just kept changing their mind." Could there be a better business model than that?
How much to implement from scratch ?
Rather than trying to bash an existing system into the desired shape.
Poor Oracle
I guess they just have to take all that money even though they didn't actually earn it.
If only there was some way to link the payment to successful delivery.....