Microsoft closes Windows 11 upgrade loophole in latest Insider build
- Reference: 1724089291
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2024/08/19/windows_11_loophole_closed/
- Source link:
The tweak arrived without fanfare in the Windows Insider [1]build 27686 . There were a few neat tweaks in the build, including updates to the Windows Sandbox Client preview and a much-needed bump from 32 GB to 2 TB for FAT32 when running the command line format function.
However, the documentation did not mention an apparent end to one workaround that bypasses Microsoft's requirements check for Windows 11. [2]According to X user @TheBobPony, the "setup.exe /product server" workaround is not supported in the latest build.
[3]
The Register contacted Microsoft to understand its intentions with the change. The switch still works in the Windows 24H2 update, but the hardware check appears to no longer be bypassed in the latest Canary channel build (27686). The company has yet to respond.
[4]
[5]
The Canary channel represents the bleeding edge of publicly available Windows development, so this could simply be a bug. Or a fix for a bug that allowed the desktop installer to behave like a server installer. The [6]hardware requirements for Windows Server 2025 are less onerous than those for the desktop operating system. As Microsoft notes: "A TPM chip is required in order to use certain features."
[7]Windows 11 Insider preview brings new Sandbox features and fatter FAT32
[8]Microsoft squashes bug that sent Windows devices to BitLocker recovery
[9]It's all drying up: Microsoft to erase 3D Paint from digital store
[10]Survey finds that four in five enterprise endpoints could run Windows 11
Therefore, a lack of a Trusted Platform Module (TPM) chip will not stop Windows Server 2025 from installing (but will prevent certain features, such as BitLocker Drive Encryption, from working). So a server-type requirements check on a machine lacking TPM hardware would allow Windows 11 to install.
Or, at least, it did. Installing build 27686 means either making sure the hardware is compliant or going through the pain of digging up another workaround.
The workaround has been known for a few years and was welcomed by users eager to upgrade to Windows 11 but frustrated by Microsoft's seemingly arbitrary PC requirements, which included a GHz or faster processor with two or more cores on a compatible 64-bit CPU, 4GB of RAM, 64GB or larger storage device, TPM version 2 and to be UEFI and Secure Boot capable.
[11]
With 14 months left until support for most versions of Windows 10 is due to end, Windows 11 continues to trail its predecessor, although the [12]gap is shrinking .
Removing the loophole indicates that Microsoft is getting serious about those requirements. ®
Get our [13]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/16/microsoft_windows_sandbox_preview/
[2] https://x.com/TheBobPony/status/1824153564425462092
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZsPAg1kz04-aS1Sgk6yrfQAAAI4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZsPAg1kz04-aS1Sgk6yrfQAAAI4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZsPAg1kz04-aS1Sgk6yrfQAAAI4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/get-started/hardware-requirements?tabs=cpu
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/16/microsoft_windows_sandbox_preview/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/14/microsoft_bitlocker_bug_security_update/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/12/in_memoriam_microsoft_3d_paint/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/07/survey_windows_on_enterprise/
[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZsPAg1kz04-aS1Sgk6yrfQAAAI4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/10/windows_11_adoption/
[13] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Should be made illegal
Considering its going to put a lot of kit in landfill it should be made illegal. Yes, we all know those devices can have Linux installed but the average Joe won't know how. Having said that I wonder if a lot of decent kit will end up cheap on ebay, with folks who've no idea thinking they just have to sell it on.
Lesson learned?
A machine bought with Win11 today may or may not meet the minimum spec for Win12 in however many years time, but it will almost certainly still be able to do the job that it is being bought for today after MS decide to pull support for Win11.
Re: Lesson learned?
Wave hands vertically whilst going Diddleee-didddllee-diddleee as we wind back to the past:
A machine bought with Win10 today may or may not meet the minimum spec for Win11 in however many years time, but it will almost certainly still be able to do the job that it is being bought for today after MS decide to pull support for Win10.
Upgrades?
It's about time that their biggest customers (Business and Government) get together and tell Microsoft to stop pissing about with unnecessary hardware requirements and fix all the bugs in current release(s).
Forced binning of capable hardware should be a crime.
Re: Upgrades?
It's worse than a crime, it is a mistake.
This always works for me
Setup.exe /skipthismicrosoftshitinstalllinux
We'll be using tablets.
Moses, is that you?
I wonder...
I'll try copying the setup.exe file from an old Win11 installer and see if that fixes it. If not there are other ways around it.