SpaceX tries to wash away Texas pollution allegations
(2024/08/13)
- Reference: 1723559532
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2024/08/13/spacex_snaps_back_over_texas/
- Source link:
Elon Musk's SpaceX is disputing claims that its rockets are polluting water in Texas thanks to the deluge system used to stop Starship ripping up the launchpad on launch.
According to the report, SpaceX has been violating environmental regulations by discharging pollutants into or near bodies of water in Texas.
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) is reported to have received 14 complaints alleging environmental impacts from SpaceX's deluge system.
[1]
According to the article in [2]CNBC , SpaceX was forced to add a water deluge system to Starship's ground systems after the [3]first launch tore chunks out of the launch pad and flung debris, including concrete chunks, over a wide area.
[4]
[5]
Other heavy-lift rockets, including NASA's Space Shuttle and the Ariane 6, use the same mechanism to help suppress noise and protect the launch pad. No doubt, in the spirit of moving fast and breaking stuff, SpaceX opted not to implement such a system for the first Starship launch and, er, broke stuff. A water deluge system was therefore added.
But SpaceX then took the very untypical step of writing a [6]lengthy response on Elon Musk's social media platform, X, disputing the CNBC article. According to SpaceX, it worked with the TCEQ throughout the build and test of the water deluge system, and the agency's personnel were on-site to observe the initial tests of it.
[7]
Furthermore, the company noted that it was covered by the Texas Multi-Sector General Permit. It said it had explicitly asked both the TCEQ and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) if the operation of the deluge system should stop but was told it could continue.
According to SpaceX, the launchpad is power-washed before the deluge system is activated, and the water from the power-washing collected and hauled away. As for the deluge system itself, the company said the water is potable and mostly vaporized.
However, the water is exposed to the exhaust from Starship's engines, among other contaminants, and some does indeed make it off the pad. According to SpaceX, "A single use of the deluge system results in potable water equivalent to a rainfall of 0.004 inches across the area outside the pad, which currently averages around 27 inches of rain per year."
[8]
SpaceX has also disputed a claim that the wastewater discharged at the site contains high levels of mercury: "All samples to-date have in fact shown either no detectable levels of mercury whatsoever or found in very few cases levels significantly below the limit the EPA maintains for drinking water."
However, a look at the company's [9]permit application [PDF] shows that mercury concentration in a sample taken from one outfall location, at 113 µg/L, is quite a bit higher than the two µg/L in the EPA regulations. It is not clear where that mercury is actually coming from.
Naturally, a human would not usually want to take a sip from whatever is discharged by SpaceX's pad - it's hardly ideal.
According to CNBC, Kenneth Teague, a coastal ecologist based outside of Austin, noted "significant negative impacts" in dumping out pollutants like mercury and high-temperature discharges. These include killing off the prey that make up the diet of seabirds.
He said: "The SpaceX application fails to address this very serious concern."
SpaceX is no stranger to [10]lawsuits over environmental worries and dealing with environmental reviews in its [11]license applications .
The US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) had public meetings due this week and next regarding the Draft Tiered Environmental Assessment for SpaceX's plan to increase the launches and landings of its Starship / Super Heavy. The first was due today, August 13. However, as of yesterday, all were abruptly postponed.
[12]Before we put half a million broadband satellites in orbit, anyone want to consider environmental effects?
[13]Low orbit satellites for phone service may cause more light pollution
[14]Methane-spotting satellite that gives true readings of industry emissions hits skies in 2024
[15]Japanese space lasers aim to clean up orbital junk
An FAA spokesperson told The Register , "The FAA is seeking additional information from SpaceX before rescheduling the public meetings."
On August 8, SpaceX [16]said it was awaiting regulatory approval for its next Starship and Superheavy launch. Despite the company's unusual step of issuing a lengthy retort to allegations regarding pollutants from its water deluge system, it appears that liftoff might need to wait a little longer before receiving that approval.
The Register contacted the TCEQ for more information and will update should the agency respond. ®
Get our [17]Tech Resources
[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZruDIVkz04-aS1Sgk6ydwwAAAI8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[2] https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/12/spacex-repeatedly-polluted-waters-in-texas-tceq-epa-found.html
[3] https://www.theregister.com/2023/04/26/us_faa_starship/
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZruDIVkz04-aS1Sgk6ydwwAAAI8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZruDIVkz04-aS1Sgk6ydwwAAAI8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1823080774012481862
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZruDIVkz04-aS1Sgk6ydwwAAAI8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZruDIVkz04-aS1Sgk6ydwwAAAI8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[9] https://www.tceq.texas.gov/downloads/permitting/wastewater/title-iv/tpdes/wq0005462000-spaceexplorationtechnologiescorp-starbaselaunchpadsite-cameron-tpdes-adminpackage.pdf
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/06/spacex_denies_environmental_lawsuit/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/14/spacex_faa_launch/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/12/starlink_spacex_environment_review/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/07/low_orbit_satellites_for_phone/
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/12/methanesat_set_to_monitor_methane/
[15] https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/31/japan_laser_space_junk_plan/
[16] https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1821650606626631760
[17] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
According to the report, SpaceX has been violating environmental regulations by discharging pollutants into or near bodies of water in Texas.
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) is reported to have received 14 complaints alleging environmental impacts from SpaceX's deluge system.
[1]
According to the article in [2]CNBC , SpaceX was forced to add a water deluge system to Starship's ground systems after the [3]first launch tore chunks out of the launch pad and flung debris, including concrete chunks, over a wide area.
[4]
[5]
Other heavy-lift rockets, including NASA's Space Shuttle and the Ariane 6, use the same mechanism to help suppress noise and protect the launch pad. No doubt, in the spirit of moving fast and breaking stuff, SpaceX opted not to implement such a system for the first Starship launch and, er, broke stuff. A water deluge system was therefore added.
But SpaceX then took the very untypical step of writing a [6]lengthy response on Elon Musk's social media platform, X, disputing the CNBC article. According to SpaceX, it worked with the TCEQ throughout the build and test of the water deluge system, and the agency's personnel were on-site to observe the initial tests of it.
[7]
Furthermore, the company noted that it was covered by the Texas Multi-Sector General Permit. It said it had explicitly asked both the TCEQ and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) if the operation of the deluge system should stop but was told it could continue.
According to SpaceX, the launchpad is power-washed before the deluge system is activated, and the water from the power-washing collected and hauled away. As for the deluge system itself, the company said the water is potable and mostly vaporized.
However, the water is exposed to the exhaust from Starship's engines, among other contaminants, and some does indeed make it off the pad. According to SpaceX, "A single use of the deluge system results in potable water equivalent to a rainfall of 0.004 inches across the area outside the pad, which currently averages around 27 inches of rain per year."
[8]
SpaceX has also disputed a claim that the wastewater discharged at the site contains high levels of mercury: "All samples to-date have in fact shown either no detectable levels of mercury whatsoever or found in very few cases levels significantly below the limit the EPA maintains for drinking water."
However, a look at the company's [9]permit application [PDF] shows that mercury concentration in a sample taken from one outfall location, at 113 µg/L, is quite a bit higher than the two µg/L in the EPA regulations. It is not clear where that mercury is actually coming from.
Naturally, a human would not usually want to take a sip from whatever is discharged by SpaceX's pad - it's hardly ideal.
According to CNBC, Kenneth Teague, a coastal ecologist based outside of Austin, noted "significant negative impacts" in dumping out pollutants like mercury and high-temperature discharges. These include killing off the prey that make up the diet of seabirds.
He said: "The SpaceX application fails to address this very serious concern."
SpaceX is no stranger to [10]lawsuits over environmental worries and dealing with environmental reviews in its [11]license applications .
The US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) had public meetings due this week and next regarding the Draft Tiered Environmental Assessment for SpaceX's plan to increase the launches and landings of its Starship / Super Heavy. The first was due today, August 13. However, as of yesterday, all were abruptly postponed.
[12]Before we put half a million broadband satellites in orbit, anyone want to consider environmental effects?
[13]Low orbit satellites for phone service may cause more light pollution
[14]Methane-spotting satellite that gives true readings of industry emissions hits skies in 2024
[15]Japanese space lasers aim to clean up orbital junk
An FAA spokesperson told The Register , "The FAA is seeking additional information from SpaceX before rescheduling the public meetings."
On August 8, SpaceX [16]said it was awaiting regulatory approval for its next Starship and Superheavy launch. Despite the company's unusual step of issuing a lengthy retort to allegations regarding pollutants from its water deluge system, it appears that liftoff might need to wait a little longer before receiving that approval.
The Register contacted the TCEQ for more information and will update should the agency respond. ®
Get our [17]Tech Resources
[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZruDIVkz04-aS1Sgk6ydwwAAAI8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[2] https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/12/spacex-repeatedly-polluted-waters-in-texas-tceq-epa-found.html
[3] https://www.theregister.com/2023/04/26/us_faa_starship/
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZruDIVkz04-aS1Sgk6ydwwAAAI8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZruDIVkz04-aS1Sgk6ydwwAAAI8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1823080774012481862
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZruDIVkz04-aS1Sgk6ydwwAAAI8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZruDIVkz04-aS1Sgk6ydwwAAAI8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[9] https://www.tceq.texas.gov/downloads/permitting/wastewater/title-iv/tpdes/wq0005462000-spaceexplorationtechnologiescorp-starbaselaunchpadsite-cameron-tpdes-adminpackage.pdf
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/06/spacex_denies_environmental_lawsuit/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/14/spacex_faa_launch/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/12/starlink_spacex_environment_review/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/07/low_orbit_satellites_for_phone/
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/12/methanesat_set_to_monitor_methane/
[15] https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/31/japan_laser_space_junk_plan/
[16] https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1821650606626631760
[17] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Seen elsewhere...
Vulch
Gah, should be "< .113" which I spot after the edit window closes.
Re: Seen elsewhere...
Jellied Eel
...and it's also somewhat puzzling where that amount of mercury could be coming from if it isn't a typo.
That's what I don't get. If it's taking potable water, storing it, then blowtorching it.. Where might the mercury be coming from? I guess being EPA-land, Space X would have to account for any mercury it might use on or around its launches that might be a source. I kinda wonder if when the report says it's fresh/potable water, it's being extracted from the wells around the Texas site where from memory, fraccing water had been dumped so if that's the source. If so, should be traceable.
Re: Seen elsewhere...
Flocke Kroes
Your right, it is a typo. The [1]report (big pdf) gets it wrong in multiple places but quotes the source of the measurement correctly on page 240.
[1] https://www.tceq.texas.gov/downloads/permitting/wastewater/title-iv/tpdes/wq0005462000-spaceexplorationtechnologiescorp-starbaselaunchpadsite-cameron-tpdes-adminpackage.pdf
Holy Fluid Link!
The Oncoming Scorn
Icon - Where's my sonic?
tony72
"However, the water is exposed to the exhaust from Starship's engines, among other contaminants
The byproducts of burning methane and oxygen are water and carbon dioxide, not exactly highly toxic. Not sure what the byproducts of the TEA-TEB ingition sauce are, so I guess there might be a tiny amount of something from that.
No TEA-TEB here
Mishak
That's used on Falcon9 - Raptor uses a spark-like ignitor.
Seen elsewhere...
There have been notes that the minimum detectable level for mercury in the tests used is 0.113 ug/l and it is standard to list negligible mercury concentration as "> .113" in reports. This could mean it's just a typo no-one caught until now, and it's also somewhat puzzling where that amount of mercury could be coming from if it isn't a typo.