Never put off until tomorrow what someone could erase today
- Reference: 1722238206
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2024/07/29/who_me/
- Source link:
This week's mere mortal is someone we'll Regomize as "Christopher" who worked, back in the halcyon days of the 1990s, as a "gopher/fix-it" type guy at a stockbroking firm – the kind of place that operated basically 24 hours a day whenever a financial market was open somewhere.
Part of Christopher's task was to archive each day's trades and ensure backups were made onto Digital Audio Tape (DAT) – a technology we're sure few remember fondly. It's important to note that both the trading software and the backup software were customized, Christopher was a vital cog in the wheel, and very diligent in his duties.
[1]
You may also recall that towards the end of the 1990s there was this whole big Y2K thing going around that prompted a lot of orgs to update their systems lest disaster strike at the dawn of the millennium. Christopher's employer was one such and took the opportunity to update its hardware and software. It also switched from the DAT backups to "a Commvault setup with a new network attached tape library using DLT tapes" according to Christopher.
[2]
[3]
Longish story shortish, almost everything was changing. That "almost" matters, so remember it.
Complicating matters, the upgrade had to be done without losing trading time. That meant setting up the new server in advance, getting the software vendor to log in and transfer the system over, then finding a brief window after the old server had finished its archiving run to test the new server before trading started.
[4]
The other trick was that the existing workstations were staying in place – thus the "almost." To avoid delays connecting workstations to the new server, the shiny box was set up as a clone of the old one. Even the server’s name and IP address were replicated.
Thus, the two servers could obviously not both be running on the network at the same time.
[5]Facebook prank sent techie straight to Excel hell
[6]There is no honor among RAM thieves – but sometimes there is karma
[7]Outback shocker left Aussie techie with a secret not worth sharing
[8]An arc welder in the datacenter: What could possibly go wrong?
The server cloning scheme made it possible to cutover to the new infrastructure in the very short window between trading days. But it didn't allow enough time for the masses of historical data stored on the RAID within the old server to be transferred to the new one.
And because the two servers could not coexist on the network, moving the data would be accomplished with a portable USB hard drive. You'll no doubt recall that at this time neither the capacities nor the speeds of such devices were impressive.
By the time the new server was up and running and tested, Christopher had been working 20 hours straight, and was understandably tired. He decided to get a few hours' sleep before any of the stockbrokers started calling in with support questions (as was inevitable given the new system).
[9]
The software vendor assured him that the copy of the historical data, while important, was essentially a direct copy process and not urgent. It could be done any time. So Christopher put it on his to-do list.
Oops.
Two weeks passed, and some bright spark in IT decided that that old server that had been sitting around doing nothing ought to be put to some good use. It was therefore reformatted, wiped clean and repurposed elsewhere in the organization.
Had Christopher got around to copying the data from it to the new server? You know the answer.
But what about those DATs, we hear you ask? They were archiving the data from each day – much of what was in the RAID existed nowhere else.
That's another oops right there.
It all would have been just a lesson learned the hard way except that one of the brokers turned out to have been doing some questionable things, and law enforcement requested a look at some historic data on trades in which they'd been involved. Data that no longer existed, because Christopher didn't get around to it.
As it transpired there was sufficient other information available on said stockbroker's naughtiness that Christopher's oversight did not mean an escape from justice. Sometimes you just can't catch a break.
If you've been thinking about maybe sending a story of your own tech misadventures to Who, Me? one of these days, [10]click here to do it right now – don't put it off any longer! We need your anecdotes as the Who, Me mailbox has seen better days. ®
Get our [11]Tech Resources
[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/storage&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZqdoQ-BXIH@i2SPmsaY-SwAAAAI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/storage&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZqdoQ-BXIH@i2SPmsaY-SwAAAAI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/storage&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZqdoQ-BXIH@i2SPmsaY-SwAAAAI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/storage&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZqdoQ-BXIH@i2SPmsaY-SwAAAAI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/22/who_me/
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/15/who_me/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/08/who_me/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/01/who_me/
[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/storage&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZqdoQ-BXIH@i2SPmsaY-SwAAAAI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[10] mailto:whome@theregister.com
[11] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Because it's a lot less messy that backing up to BLT...
Had Christopher got around to copying the data from it to the new server? You know the answer.
Sounds like Christopher shares a lot of the blame here...
Maybe he's had time to take stock of the situation
I certainly wouldn't want to trade places with him...
I dont know. Who wipes a server, without checking that it's REALLY no longer needed. Or at least backing up the Server first to make sure that the data IS available should someone need it...
I'd say that Techy holds the biggest portion of the blame...
Disagree
Considering the type of pressure he was under, he was doing a lot better than most people would. I've done work in these places (quite unrelated to the dealing) and they treat you like shit.
Coat 'cos I was happy to get out of the place.
DAT - a technology we're sure few remember fondly
I was fortunate enough to use it when it was not only reasonably affordable but a single tape would hold a full backup of our entire storage or a week of incrementals. For a brief period it was almost perfect.
Before that it was Zip drives, which may partly explain my DAT-nostalgia.
Re: DAT - a technology we're sure few remember fondly
In my case the before was DEC TK50s, a whole 95MB on one cartridge - the end of year backup involved me repeatedly going back to the office from the pub to change cartridges.
We were glad to get DAT!
Re: DAT - a technology we're sure few remember fondly
I worked in IT and we were in the process of updating the OS on machines from NT 4 to XP. We asked everyone to ensure that they backed up ALL their data before we did the deed.
We were scheduled to upgrade the machines in the security office. They all said "Yes, we've backed up our data" including the lady who used a ZIP drive for such a purpose. The deed was done and people copied their data back. All except the ZIP drive user - all her disks were blank.
We checked all the disks and she wasn't lying (never trust a user when they say something isn't working). Due to this we asked her to demonstrate her back up process (which she supposedly did every day). The process involved putting the ZIP disk into the internal drive, waiting for the light to stop flashing, ejecting the disk, and putting the disk into a fireproof safe. No software was run, no files copied manually, nothing. Yes, dear reader, she thought that the drive checking a disk was present was the backup process.
Her colleagues quickly educated her as to how backups should be performed. They also watched her like a hawk. I have no idea if they ever got the data back from somewhere else or if it needed to be re-entered manually (details on 500+ employees)
Re: DAT - a technology we're sure few remember fondly
Hands up everyone who was expecting the click of death.
Re: DAT - a technology we're sure few remember fondly
damn your hide! I'd buried that unpleasant memory, I saw that one too many times!
Re: DAT - a technology we're sure few remember fondly
End users…
In some respects it is incidents like this that show just how little has change in personal computing to actually address real issues.
Whilst Windows is the obvious candidate to pick apart the others aren’t much better.
Re: DAT - a technology we're sure few remember fondly
DAT meant removable storage capacious enough for a tower format server small enough to fit into a tower format server. A great solution if it didn't also involve the HP DAT library device.
Note to all staff
The compliance system will be down tomorrow afternoon while it is being upgraded.
Please refrain from making any illegal transactions during this time.
Thanks in Advance
... part deux
As you may know, the upgrade we announced yesterday was completed much sooner than we expected.
Would the following people please report to H.R. as soon as you see this note.
TWO WEEKS?
Seriously? An important server gets wiped in 2 weeks? Without the consent of the rest of the staff?
You can't chalk that one up to Christopher, no matter how lazy he was.
DLT? Why on all earth was a radio DJ doing backups?