Study shock! AI hinders productivity and makes working worse
- Reference: 1721975653
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2024/07/26/ai_hinders_productivity/
- Source link:
The survey elicited responses from 2,500 workers across the US, UK, Australia, and Canada. Half of respondents were C-suite execs, a quarter worked full time and the remained were freelancers. Respondents represent different age groups and genders, but all were required to have completed high school and to use a computer for their work at least “sometimes.”
Findings include that C-suite executives are asking more of workers – 81 percent of 1,250 executive respondents acknowledge as much, according to the [1]survey .
[2]
Bosses are urging employees to increase their output with the help of AI tools (37 percent), to expand their skill sets (35 percent), take on a wide range of responsibilities (30 percent), return to the office (27 percent), work more efficiently (26 percent), and work more hours (20 percent).
[3]
[4]
The managerial productivity push has left workers feeling unable to cope and burned out.
"Seventy-one percent are burned out and nearly two-thirds (65 percent) report struggling with increasing employer demands," according to the survey. "Alarmingly, one in three employees say they will likely quit their jobs in the next six months because they are burned out or overworked."
[5]
Employees appear to share management’s optimism for AI, with 65 percent predicting machine learning will make them more productive. But there's a gap between belief and reality.
Some 47 percent of workers who use AI tools say they have no idea how to deliver the expected productivity gains. And more than three out of four workers (77 percent) say AI tools have made them less productive while increasing their workload.
Thirty-nine percent of survey respondents said they're spending more time reviewing or moderating AI-generated content, 23 percent said they're investing time learning how to use AI tools, and 21 percent said they're being asked to do more work.
[6]
"Forty percent of employees feel their company is asking too much of them when it comes to AI," the Institute’s summary of the survey states.
[7]OpenAI unveils AI search engine SearchGPT – not that you're allowed to use it yet
[8]FYI: Data from deleted GitHub repos may not actually be deleted
[9]AI models face collapse if they overdose on their own output
[10]Datacenters guzzled more than a fifth of Ireland's electricity in 2023
The report apportions some blame to executives for overestimating employee readiness to adopt AI tools. While 37 percent of C-suite leaders at companies using AI rated their workforce as skilled and comfortable when using AI tools, only 17 percent of employees shared that sentiment.
Tellingly, while 96 percent of execs said they see AI tools improving productivity, only 26 percent operate workplace AI training programs, and only 13 percent reported "a well-implemented AI strategy." In the boardroom, AI seems to encourage magical thinking.
Meanwhile, in the trenches, 38 percent of staff said they felt overwhelmed by the demand to use AI at work.
The Upwork report suggests that AI isn't a simple productivity fix. Rather, organizations need to understand the technology and develop processes that help staff to benefit.
"Our research shows that introducing new technologies into outdated work models and systems is failing to unlock the full expected productivity value of AI," wrote Kelly Monahan, managing director of The Upwork Research Institute, in [11]a statement . "While it's certainly possible for AI to simultaneously boost productivity and improve employee well-being, this outcome will require a fundamental shift in how we organize talent and work."
Coincidentally, the Institute – part of the Upwork platform for hiring freelance workers – suggests that hiring freelance workers can help. "When compared with full-time employees, more freelancers claim to be AI-ready," the report claims.
And if freelancers get burned out, there are always fresh freelancers on the shelf. ®
Get our [12]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.upwork.com/research/ai-enhanced-work-models
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZqNzxpU7C0V72M0l2qBb-gAAANQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZqNzxpU7C0V72M0l2qBb-gAAANQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZqNzxpU7C0V72M0l2qBb-gAAANQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZqNzxpU7C0V72M0l2qBb-gAAANQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZqNzxpU7C0V72M0l2qBb-gAAANQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/25/openai_finally_launches_searchgpt_its/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/25/data_from_deleted_github_repos/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/25/ai_will_eat_itself/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/25/ireland_datacenter_power_consumption/
[11] https://investors.upwork.com/news-releases/news-release-details/upwork-study-finds-employee-workloads-rising-despite-increased-c
[12] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Ah, the old one...
"my SQL query is stumbling along"
A well-crafted SQL query can stumble along for days. it's just a matter of knowing which columns aren't indexed.
C-Suite are often divorced from reality. They see these tools as golden tickets to being able to hire low-skilled labour at reduced cost as opposed to just tools that can aid in performing a task. The real problem comes when there is a failure and you don't have any skilled engineers left who can debug and resolve the issue. For example, I've sat in a couple of technical interviews where I've asked simple questions only to be met with the answer "Well I run this automation script....", and the candidate was completely unaware of how to do the job otherwise.
That is why companies target C-Suites with all the sales bull. The will buy anything if the marketing looks good.
How else did CrowdStrike get to where it is?
Why is everything now marketed with some AI elements?
It is what o er paid boses want to hear. Anything that is not:
Cloud native
AI driven
Subscription priced
Is considered old fashioned or the term I detest "legacy ".
AI seems to encourage magical thinking
That pretty much sums it up: The upper levels of most companies run on magical thinking, regardless of technology.
"Coincidentally, the Institute – part of the Upwork platform for hiring freelance workers – suggests that hiring freelance workers can help."
Ah! I was _wondering_ why the survey had been designed so as to poll double the number of freelancers as full-time workers.
Wrong productivity trajectory
AI is supposed to replace the workforce! You don't keep them on board and pay them. You replace and fire the lazy meatbags.
Hey, C-suite, get going doing your jobs. You need to start firing all those meatbags and cash your well-deserved hundredfold bonus in the process!
/s
Wow, what Insights...
Management divorced from reality! Workers Overworked! AI is not actually helpful! Water is wet! Bears shit in the woods! The Pope is Catholic!
Amazing insights in this report... Truly wonderous! Can I get paid to produce such reports too?
Re: Wow, what Insights...
No that's AI work these days
Re: Wow, what Insights...
Not sure about the Pope, to be honest.
same as it ever was...
Yep another technology to use as a tool. Problems are not so much the tools or technology, it's knowing what you are trying to do with them, then building the processes.
Re: same as it ever was...
Not quite : it's another beta version of software used in production.
It was ever thus.
"When compared with full-time employees, more freelancers claim to be AI-ready"
MRDA
What is rather ironic is that the jobs most suited to being shunted over to AI are the C-Suite jobs.
Think how much money would be saved there!
I think this skit says it all....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCZt4mCcCV8
that explains much
so LLM produce something without context. When put into a loop gibberish results. Would this apply to "real" intelligence also ? So does this explain the stupidites emitted from manglement , much academia and political classes in their bubbles ?
Re: that explains much
"So does this explain the stupidites emitted from manglement , much academia and political classes in their bubbles ?"
Of course. See flat earthers, creationists etc. all pretty much exclusively consume their own bullshit, all are incoherent. Garbage in, garbage out.
Sometimes, in my idle moments, I wonder what would have to change and how you would set up economies and businesses where the turds don't float to the top.
The system is broken, that's pretty clear, but what checks and balances would you need - and how would you implement them past the people who have greatest interest and influence of things NOT changing, even if it's approaching collapse at alarming speeds?
Haven't we tried just about tried everything and the result is always gravitation towards some variation of "sociopaths kissing upwards and kicking downwards"?
Take this job and ....
> one in three employees say they will likely quit their jobs in the next six months
But we all know that they won't.
"AI seems to encourage magical thinking."
I think it's more along the lines of being in top management is associated with magical thinking. I'm not too sure about which way the causality runs.
Ah, the old one...
as the BOFH remarked when the Boss asked for something:
"and you want us to make it 'better' using 'technology', and if we just 'thought out of the box' the solution would 'stare us in the eyes'"
Or something like that. Didn't the boss get cut by the PFY with a linoleum knife then?
Remember, folks, if you cannot read ElReg and the BOFH and declare it as "essential training" you have the wrong job (that said, I do work enough, and currently my code's compiling / my SQL query is stumbling along)