News: 1719980151

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

VMware license changes mean bare metal can make a comeback through 'devirtualization', says Gartner

(2024/07/03)


Analyst firm Gartner has published its 2024 Hype Cycle for Data Center Infrastructure Technologies, and added physical-to-virtual migrations – aka "devirtualization" – to its list of ideas that are set to take off, thanks to Broadcom's licensing changes.

"As on-premises virtualization projects move from [enterprise license agreement] ELA and perpetual licenses to new bundling, socket-to-core ratios and consumption models, the costs and pricing can increase two or three times," the Hype Cycle opines.

Those costs are hard to justify for some large workloads, which Gartner wrote "do not benefit from the same density increases and cost savings as consolidating small workloads."

[1]

Devirtualization can therefore help, Gartner argues – with plenty of caveats about the cost and complexity of acquiring and operating bare metal systems that offer the same resilience as a virtualized environment.

[2]

[3]

The Hype Cycle rates devirtualization as currently applicable to one percent of orgs, but rates it as five-to-ten years away from reaching the "plateau of productivity" at which technologies are mature.

Migrating to new hypervisors – which Gartner terms "revirtualization" or virtual to virtual migration – is rated a tech that has reached peak hype as it is applicable to between five and twenty percent of organizations.

[4]

Again, VMware's licensing changes are mentioned as a driver.

"Revirtualization is typically undertaken to overcome a technical deficiency or to address a viability or commercial risk," the hype cycle explains, adding that such efforts could "increase total cost of ownership, introduce immature administrative and management tooling, create additional operational burden or reliability concerns."

But Gartner thinks those risks might be worth it as they are "intended to offset exposure to increased audit and contractual issues arising from incumbent providers moving to subscription models."

[5]

Other technologies rated as "on the rise" in this hype cycle are:

Emerging memory technologies – Gartner feels magnetoresistive random access memory (MRAM) and resistive random access memory (ReRAM) could help scale complex applications;

Network digital twins – The increasing complexity of networks means having an offline model will be useful to test changes – Gartner believes this tech could improve delivery times for requests by 20 percent;

Off-grid power – Essentially privately owned generators yoked to datacenters reduce dependency on the grid, to ensure it's possible to expand. Hydrogen-powered datacenters also made the rising techs list, nuclear fusion rated a mention for its potential to provide "abundant and affordable energy," and Small Modular Nuclear Reactors are also seen as a tech to watch;

Augmented reality in the datacenter – Gartner thinks tech that "provides technicians with real-time data visualization, remote guidance and interactive 3D models to facilitate complex tasks and maintenance processes" can reduce the time needed for troubleshooting and repairs, and make manuals redundant.

[6]SAP customers warned on hidden risks in the unofficial route to the cloud

[7]AI-assisted automation for clouds and networks climbs Gartner's hype cycles

[8]AI chip sales predicted to jump by a third this year – then cool off

[9]Don't rent out that container ship yet: CIOs and biz buyers view AI PCs with some caution

Among the technologies rated as having reached peak hype are circular economies in IT, net-zero datacenters, consumption-based models for on-prem and hybrid IT, and direct-to-chip (D2C) liquid cooling.

Edge computing is in trouble, Gartner believes, as the analyst firm rates it as sliding into the trough of disillusionment – the point at which a tech has failed to deliver on its promise.

Infrastructure automation is also sliding, as is immersion cooling. Hybrid servers tuned for double duty – running information technology and operational technology workloads – are also disappointing buyers, as is composable infrastructure.

Tech ideas that are starting to come good and climb the slope to the plateau of productivity include immutable infrastructure – architectural patterns that are never changed to enhance manageability and security – and software-defined infrastructure. ®

Get our [10]Tech Resources



[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/virtualization&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZoUhP7TqwGWlz2Salg5kMQAAAMU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/virtualization&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZoUhP7TqwGWlz2Salg5kMQAAAMU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/virtualization&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZoUhP7TqwGWlz2Salg5kMQAAAMU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/virtualization&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZoUhP7TqwGWlz2Salg5kMQAAAMU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/virtualization&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZoUhP7TqwGWlz2Salg5kMQAAAMU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2024/06/25/sap_customers_warned_on_hidden/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2024/06/20/gartner_networking_cloud_hype_cycles_ai/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2024/05/29/ai_processor_revenue_gartner/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2024/04/23/cios_biz_buyers_on_ai_pcs/

[10] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



started doing this in early 2014

Nate Amsden

(vmware customer since 1999) .. While investigating ways of improving performance and cost for the org's stateless web applications I decided on LXC on bare metal for them. My more recent LXC servers go a bit further in that they have fibrechannel cards and boot from SAN. My original systems just used internal storage. I still only use it for stateless systems, that is systems that can fail and I don't really care. I have read that newer version(s) of LXC and/or LXD allow for more fancy things like live migration in some cases?? but I have never looked into that. Management of the systems is almost identical to VMs, everything is configured via Chef, and they all run the same kind of services as the VMs. You wouldn't know you were in a container unless you were really poking around. Provisioning is fairly similar as well(as is applying OS updates), mostly custom scripts written by me which have been evolving bit by bit since around 2007. Fortunately drivers haven't been an issue at all on the systems I have. I recall it being a real PITA back in the early-mid 2000s with drivers on bare metal Linux especially e1000* and in some cases SATA drivers too(mainly on HP Proliants). I spent tons of hours finding/compiling drivers and inserting them into kickstart initrds which were then pxe booted. Only time in my life I used "cpio".

I adopted LXC for my main server at home back in ~2017 as well, which runs 7 containers for various things, but I still have VMware at my personal co-lo with 3 small hosts there with a couple dozen VMs on local storage. Provisioning for home stuff and management there is entirely manual, no fancy configuration management.

I do plan to do a migration for some legacy MSSQL Enterprise servers to physical hardware as well soon as the org is opting not to renew software assurance so licensing costs for a VM environment will go way up(as SA grants the ability to license just the CPUs for the VMs running SQL(regardless of number of CPUs in the VM environment), but you lose that when you stop paying for SA), simpler just to consolidate onto a pair of physical servers in a shared nothing cluster. I've never tried boot from SAN with Windows before but from what I read it should work fine..(yes I like boot from SAN, in this case each server will be connected to a different storage array).

I've never personally been interested in docker style stuff so have never gone that route(I do have to interact with docker on occasion for a few things and it's always annoying). Previous org played with kubernetes for a couple of years at least and it was a practical nightmare as far as I was concerned anyway, I'm sure it has it's use cases but for 95% of orgs it's way overkill and over complexity.

"abundant and affordable energy,"

Neil Barnes

Yay! Energy too cheap to meter.

Again!

Re: "abundant and affordable energy,"

Korev

Don't be so cynical, we're only a decade away from commercial nuclear fusion!

As we were ten years ago...

There may be push-back.

nematoad

...immutable infrastructure – architectural patterns that are never changed to enhance manageability and security

And how long will it be that the likes of Microsoft, Apple, Nvidia et al start railing against "old, outmoded technology" that disrupts the upgrade treadmill and thus fails to deliver the sorts of quarterly returns that such companies have become used to?

mmm

Anonymous Coward

people are still paying and listening to gartners utter bullshit?

fools and their money comes to mind

Re: mmm

James Anderson

100% agree -- ever go back and look at what Gartner were predicting five or ten years ago.

All there insights were either "the bleeding obvious" or "whatever happened to ....... ".

But some managers need a couple of consultants to tell them when to go toilet.

Re: mmm

Kevin Johnston

The big problem is that Gartner provides lots of pretty pictures/charts which always count for more at Board Level than simply being a subject matter expert (aka the poor bugger that gets stuck with throwing away all the resilience plans to fit things into THE NEW WAY)

It never ceases to amaze me that companies can find millions and more to move everything to new untested platforms but never find enough to pay someone to fix the broken bits that people have been screaming about for years. But I suppose the replatform will automagically fix it like it says on Figure 4b

My report – buy it now!

Charlie Clark

After increasing its prices for its commodified product line, Company X starts losing customers to competitors with cheaper alternatives.

Virtualisation itself is done but we will generally pay a reasonable for training and management and monitoring systems.

Anonymous Coward

I love all this nonsense, will keep us all in work for years to come, trebles all round

If people drank ink instead of Schlitz, they'd be better off.
-- Edward E. Hippensteel

[What brand of ink? Ed.]