News: 1715879593

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Wiley shuts 19 scholarly journals amid AI paper mill problems

(2024/05/16)


US publishing house Wiley this week discontinued 19 scientific journals overseen by its Hindawi subsidiary, the center of a long-running scholarly publishing scandal.

In December 2023 Wiley announced it would stop using the Hindawi brand, [1]acquired in 2021 , following its decision in May 2023 [2]to shut four of its journals "to mitigate against systematic manipulation of the publishing process."

Hindawi's journals were found to be publishing papers from paper mills – organizations or groups of individuals who try to subvert the academic publishing process for financial gain. Over the past two years, a Wiley spokesperson told The Register , the publisher has retracted more than 11,300 papers from its Hindawi portfolio.

[3]

As described in a Wiley-authored [4]white paper published last December, "Tackling publication manipulation at scale: Hindawi’s journey and lessons for academic publishing," paper mills rely on various unethical practices – such as the use of AI in manuscript fabrication and image manipulations, and gaming the peer review process.

[5]

[6]

The Hindawi affair coincided with the [7]departure of Wiley president and CEO Brian Napack in October, 2023. In its fiscal Q2 2024 earnings [8]report [PDF] last December, Wiley admitted its $18 million decline in research publishing revenue was "mainly due to the Hindawi publishing disruption."

In January, Wiley signed on to [9]United2Act – an industry initiative to combat paper mills.

[10]

But the concern over scholarly research integrity isn't confined to Wiley publications. A [11]study published in Nature last July suggests as many as a quarter of clinical trials are problematic or entirely fabricated.

The increasing availability and sophistication of generative AI is not the only factor contributing to the academic publishing crisis, but AI tools make fakery easier.

"The industry recognizes that AI is utilized by paper mills to generate fraudulent content," Wiley's spokesperson told us. "We've recently introduced a [12]new screening technology that helps identify papers with potential misuse of generative AI before the point of publication."

[13]

According to a preprint [14]paper released in February, the volume of papers submitted to ArXiv increased considerably in the top three categories between 2019 and 2023 – a period that roughly coincides with the debut of tools like ChatGPT. Computer science papers increased by 200 percent during these four years, followed by physics papers (45 percent) and mathematics (22 percent).

[15]OpenAI says natively multimodal GPT-4o eats text, visuals, sound – and emits the same

[16]Prof asks court to protect his Unfollow Everything 2.0 extension from Facebook's ire

[17]Microsoft teases deepfake AI that's too powerful to release

[18]H-1B visa fraud alive and well amid efforts to crack down on abuse

Academic publishers, however, appear to want the benefits of AI writing assistance without the downsides. Springer Nature, for example, last October [19]launched Curie – an AI-powered writing assistant intended to help scientists whose first language is not English. Hence [20]calls for better tools [PDF] to detect generative AI output – a call [21]answered [22]by [23]recent [24]efforts to improve AI content watermarking – which some researchers argue [25]won't work .

A Wiley spokesperson characterized the decision to [26]shut the 19 journals as part of its previously announced plan to integrate the Hindawi and Wiley portfolios, and distinct from the paper mill issue.

"As part of this integration, and as is standard practice, we reviewed our journal portfolio and decided to close 19 Hindawi journals that no longer serve their communities," the spokesperson told The Register .

"It is important to draw a distinction between the journal closures occurring now as part of our portfolio integration and the four journals closed in May 2023. The journals closed in May 2023 were heavily impacted by paper mills to such an extent it was in the best interest of the scholarly community to discontinue them immediately."

Meanwhile, in Wiley's fiscal [27]Q3 2024 earnings report , the publisher noted that revenue for its learning division is expected to be toward the higher end of projections due to "Q4 content rights deals for training AI models." ®

Get our [28]Tech Resources



[1] https://newsroom.wiley.com/press-releases/press-release-details/2021/Wiley-Announces-the-Acquisition-of-Hindawi/default.aspx

[2] https://www.hindawi.com/post/evolving-our-portfolio-response-integrity-challenges/

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZkaCByCb46g3C5QIpmAKqwAAANQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[4] https://www.wiley.com/en-us/network/publishing/research-publishing/open-access/hindawi-publication-manipulation-whitepaper

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZkaCByCb46g3C5QIpmAKqwAAANQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZkaCByCb46g3C5QIpmAKqwAAANQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://newsroom.wiley.com/press-releases/press-release-details/2023/Wiley-Announces-CEO-Transition/default.aspx

[8] https://s27.q4cdn.com/812717746/files/doc_financials/2024/q2/Q224-Earnings-Presentation-Final.pdf

[9] https://united2act.org/

[10] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZkaCByCb46g3C5QIpmAKqwAAANQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[11] https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02299-w

[12] https://newsroom.wiley.com/press-releases/press-release-details/2024/Wiley-announces-pilot-of-new-AI-powered-Papermill-Detection-service/default.aspx

[13] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZkaCByCb46g3C5QIpmAKqwAAANQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[14] https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.13812

[15] https://www.theregister.com/2024/05/13/openai_gpt4o/

[16] https://www.theregister.com/2024/05/02/meta_facebook_tool/

[17] https://www.theregister.com/2024/04/20/microsoft_deepfake_vasa/

[18] https://www.theregister.com/2024/04/09/h1b_visa_fraud/

[19] https://group.springernature.com/gp/group/media/press-releases/ai-powered-scientific-writing-assitant-launched/26176230

[20] https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/776857/1-s2.0-S2666389922X00044/1-s2.0-S2666389923000430/main.pdf

[21] https://www.theregister.com/2024/02/06/meta_ai_label/

[22] https://www.theregister.com/2024/05/10/tiktok_ai_watermarking/

[23] https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8912793-c2pa-in-dall-e-3

[24] https://deepmind.google/technologies/synthid/

[25] https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/02/watermarking_security_checks

[26] https://www.hindawi.com/list-hindawi-journals-closing-may-2024/

[27] https://s27.q4cdn.com/812717746/files/doc_financials/2024/q3/Q324-Earnings-Presentation-Final.pdf

[28] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



sitta_europea

What happened to the review processes?

a right mess

lnLog

The whole system is a machine to make profit and keep pension funds ticking over.

Editors are seldom paid positions, similarly the peer review process is also not paid, researchers have to pay to submit papers and if they want the paper to be available to all they must pay extra, or it goes behind a pay wall.

The issue of fraudulent and or poor quality papers means a vast number of academics just do not respond to requests to provide a peer review and yet the institutions actively push for them to generate as many papers as possible with no regard given to providing peer review.

Many editors at the 'higher end' journals will ignore many papers that do not have someone significant on the author list or are submitted by an institution or country that does not meet their ideals, either ignoring or selecting for 'third world' depending on the field.

Re: a right mess

Snowy

Considering many institutions are AI mills adding Ai just makes it a bit more efficient.

Re: a right mess

gobaskof

"Editors are seldom paid positions, similarly the peer review process is also not paid, researchers have to pay to submit papers and if they want the paper to be available to all they must pay extra, or it goes behind a pay wall."

I've never seen pay to submit in the 30 or so papers I have submitted, but yes peer review is never paid, and it is very expensive to have your paper open access. Open Access has become a massive scam with many funders requiring papers to be open access, but the journal is allowed to be paid open access for some by close papers for others. The result is that many institutions are now paying the journal to publish, and then paying them again for as subscription to read other work. It would be one thing if the system worked well but we are expected to do all of the typesetting, proof reading, and very specific formatting for them. Many journals don't provide much more than a website and a brand name. Does this make it fast... no! I just got told my next paper will be released this June, it was accepted for publication in November 2023, I submitted it in August 2023. I have seen it take much longer.

Think how much faster science would be if we didn't spend years waiting for the person we paid £2k to put a pdf on their website. Peers can still review it even if the work is available from day 1 (this is what F1000 do). The system is broken. The system was incredibly broken before AI. If AI can highlight how broken the system is then this is finally a great use for AI

Since researchers hate reviewing papers

DS999

Maybe they decided to bypass them and have ChatGPT do the reviewing

Re: Since researchers hate reviewing papers

Snowy

Written by AI, Reviewed by AI, then read by AI to improve the AI.

AI all the way down!!

The future not being born, my friend, we will abstain from baptizing it.
-- George Meredith