Japan's first private satellite launch imitates SpaceX's giant explosions
- Reference: 1710312971
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2024/03/13/space_one_kairos_launch_fail/
- Source link:
The first flight of the KAIROS – a rocket developed by private entity SPACE ONE – barely got off the pad before it was detonated by mission control.
Kairos has a single solid propellant motor, a liquid-fuelled upper stage, and the ability to hoist payloads up to 150 kilograms into a Sun-synchronous orbit at around 500km altitude. Payloads destined for low Earth orbit at the same altitude can weigh up to 250kg, provided they fit within the 1.5-meter diameter fairing.
[1]
SPACE ONE has developed single- and multi-satellite payload plans, and hopes to enter the commercial launch market as a "courier service."
[2]
[3]
That idea failed to launch today because Kairos exploded five seconds into flight – as shown in the video below.
[4]Youtube Video
[5]
Local media [6]report that the mission was aborted after striking unspecified trouble – qualifying the launch as less than a complete failure as it did not explode uncontrollably.
The rocket carried a payload for Japan's government, thought to be an experimental augmentation to its heavenly intelligence assets.
[7]NASA and Japan's X-ray satellite space 'scope sends first snaps of distant galaxies
[8]Japan orders local giants LINE and NAVER to disentangle their tech stacks
[9]The batteries on Odysseus, the hero private Moon lander, have run out
[10]NTT boss takes early retirement to atone for data leak
Japan's space program has seen mixed success of late. Some of its efforts – like the Hayabusa asteroid sample return mission – were [11]stunning successes .
But when the national space agency's (JAXA's) [12]SLIM lander touched down on the Moon in January this year, it landed on its side and was declared a "minimum" success. It did unexpectedly [13]survive a lunar night , so that's a few more points in its favor.
Japan's also had trouble with recent launches – its planned new workhorse H3 rocket [14]failed on its first flight in July 2023, following a similar fate for the normally reliable [15]Epsilon in October 2022.
[16]
The H3 eventually made it into space in March.
Amid all that rocketry, JAXA was reminded that securing Microsoft products can be harder than rocket science when its [17]Active Directory came under attack, following cyber attacks in 2016 and 2012.
JAXA is not to blame for SPACE ONE's problems, but like JAXA the upstart relies on input from Japan's industrial giants – many of which aspire to extend into the aerospace sector, but for now are falling back to Earth with worrying regularity. ®
Get our [18]Tech Resources
[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZfGHSi57D8kcoFPQQ6La2AAAAJQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZfGHSi57D8kcoFPQQ6La2AAAAJQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZfGHSi57D8kcoFPQQ6La2AAAAJQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://www.youtube.com/live/mhs7QEvGv6Q?si=NKWggjw7yU1qhueL&t=2261
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZfGHSi57D8kcoFPQQ6La2AAAAJQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2024/03/13/japan/science-health/space-one-launch/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2024/03/06/japans_xrism_graduates_to_nominal/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2024/03/06/japan_line_naver_infosec_guidance/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2024/03/02/batteries_odysseus/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2024/03/01/ntt_boss_resigns_dataleak/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2020/07/14/hayabusa2_sample_return_december_6_2020/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/26/jaxa_slim_photo/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2024/02/27/jaxa_slim_moon_lander_awakens/
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/07/jaxa_h3_test_flight_failed/
[15] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/14/epsilon_6_mission_fail/
[16] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZfGHSi57D8kcoFPQQ6La2AAAAJQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[17] https://www.theregister.com/2023/11/29/jaxa_cyberattack/
[18] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
This is very unfortunate but demonstrates exactly why everybody (including "joyriders") should remember space flight is both difficult and dangerous.
It looked like it started to pitch over too soon. The controllers didn't wait for it to be over the sea to abort, they did it quickly so the whole thing came down to start a fire on the pad. Maybe the abort was automated, but a few more seconds would have had the whole thing over water.
I can't get the video to work
In Firefox it didn't want to go. Said "can't find MIME format" or somesuch.
Tried in Brave, no cigar. Seamonkey didn't like it either.
So I copied the URL to my work PC and tried with Chrome. Still no go.
What format are you people using for even Chrome to not agree ?
P.S. : all my browsers are up to date and have no trouble viewing videos on YouTube or elsewhere, like [1]this one .
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdNXN93rK-k
Re: I can't get the video to work
Oddly enough, if you right-click & ask Firefox to open the video in a new tab it plays (from YouTube) just fine.
I thought that but it appeared that the trajectory of the vehicle (what was left of it) took it a good distance from the pad, yet the pad infrastructure was well alight. My guess is that the significant "anomaly" occurred almost at launch rather than after liftoff, probably with the 2nd stage liquid fuel system. Perhaps a few tons of fuel dumped on the pad and a major imbalance of the vehicle would be less than optimal ...
Please...
... just stop with the persistent SpaceX snark.
I know it's become the Register thing to do (especially from Simon) but it's getting really tiresome.
This stuff is hard, all the companies have suffered explosions. Here, look, here's a good one, you'll like this: https://youtu.be/aL5eddt-iAo?t=63
(The Orbital Sciences Antares launch failure)
It's actually more relevant to this article because it happened at around the same time in flight - although it's still not really worthy of mentioning (any more so than dragging SpaceX in) because all the relevant bits of technology involved are completely different.
Classic RUD
Better luck next time. Rocket science is indeed hard
Note: RUD = Rapid Unplanned Disassembly
(although I assume most Register Regulars know this)
Was Roman Roy involved?