Chunks of deorbiting ESA satellite are expected to reach the ground
- Reference: 1708354809
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2024/02/19/esas_ers2_satellite_deorbit/
- Source link:
The UK Space Agency (UKSA) [1]posted some images of the doomed European Remote Sensing (ERS-2) satellite at the end of last week. As of today, ESA's Space Debris Office [2]reckons that re-entry will take place 1114 UTC on February 21, give or take 15 hours.
ESA [3]said that due to the uncontrolled nature of the re-entry: "It is impossible to know exactly when and over which region on Earth this will happen." However, as the moment nears, scientists should be able to predict the location more accurately.
[4]
The worry is that while most of the 2,294 kg satellite will burn up in the Earth's atmosphere, substantial chunks could survive re-entry. Some [5]reports estimate the largest pieces to weigh in at 52 kg.
[6]
[7]
However, getting struck by any errant bits of ERS-2 is very unlikely. The chances are that the surviving remnants of the satellite will end up in the ocean. [8]According to ESA , the probability of a human being injured by space debris "is under 1 in 100 billion."
To put that in context, the agency added that the risk was "1.5 million times lower than the risk of being killed in an accident at home."
[9]
Furthermore, ESA is confident that none of the fragments would contain anything toxic or radioactive.
[10]LeoLabs lands $29M to dodge space junk with AI smarts
[11]How Neuraspace aims to clean up orbital clutter with AI
[12]ESA salutes Galileo satellite system meeting aviation standards
[13]ESA gives gravitational wave space probe LISA the nod for a 2035 launch
ERS-2 was launched on April 21, 1995, and performed Earth observations together with [14]ERS-1 launched on July 17, 1991. ERS-1's mission ended on March 10, 2000, due to a failure in the onboard attitude control system, but ERS-2 continued gathering data until 2011.
With fuel [15]running low , but the spacecraft still under control, ESA managers decided to deorbit the satellite. Sixty-six deorbiting maneuvers were carried out in July and August 2011, dropping the average altitude from 785 km to 573 km to reduce the chance of a collision with something else in orbit, meaning that the satellite would naturally fall back to Earth within the next couple of decades.
Having used up the last of the fuel, the mission officially ended on September 5, 2011. ERS-2's electronic systems were deactivated, and its batteries were discharged.
The re-entry follows ESA's Aeolus weather satellite, which re-entered Earth's atmosphere over Antarctica [16]in August . However, unlike Aeolus, ERS-2's return to Earth is uncontrolled and resulted from deorbit decisions taken in 2011. The rate at which its orbit has decayed since has depended on factors such as solar activity increasing atmospheric density and thus drag on the satellite.
[17]
These days, ESA has a space debris mitigation policy to ensure satellites can be disposed of at the end of their lives. The agency does, however, have a number of legacy spacecraft that it will still need to deal with. The first of ESA's Cluster quartet, "Salsa," [18]is due to re-enter over the South Pacific later in 2024. ®
Get our [19]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-space-agency-project-captures-images-of-satellite-returning-to-earth
[2] https://blogs.esa.int/rocketscience/2024/02/05/ers-2-reentry-live-updates/
[3] https://reentry.esoc.esa.int/home/blog/ers-2-reentry
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZdOJNn@9QQDde10zCjzoAQAAAEQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[5] https://phys.org/news/2024-02-european-satellite-earth-week.html
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZdOJNn@9QQDde10zCjzoAQAAAEQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZdOJNn@9QQDde10zCjzoAQAAAEQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://blogs.esa.int/rocketscience/2024/02/05/ers-2-reentry-frequently-asked-questions/
[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZdOJNn@9QQDde10zCjzoAQAAAEQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2024/02/12/leolabs_investment/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2024/02/07/neuraspace/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/30/esa_galileo_aviation/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/29/esa_lisa_experiment/
[14] https://www.eoportal.org/satellite-missions/ers-1
[15] https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/missions/ers/description
[16] https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/01/esa_aeolus_satellite/
[17] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZdOJNn@9QQDde10zCjzoAQAAAEQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[18] https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Operations/Salsa_s_last_dance_targets_reentry_over_South_Pacific
[19] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Depends if it's 1 in 100 Billion chance of *someone* getting hit, or does that apply to every human on the planet... in which case there's about a 1 in 13 chance that someone will get hit?
It's in pretty much a polar orbit, so everyone gets at least one chance to be hit.
1 in 13 per year
The actual statement on the website is "The annual risk of an individual human being injured by space debris is under 1 in 100 billion."
So it is about a 1 in 13 chance per year that someone will get injured (or maybe a bit less, as multiple people can get hit in the same year).
I don't know where they got the figures from, but they've found some reassuring generic figures, rather than work out the chances of being injured by these particular two tonnes of junk.
Most of us here on earth are far more likely to be injured by a two tonne machine on wheels than one falling from the sky, partly because there are far more of them about.
Only when there are 100 billion events that "happen all the time".
As far as I am aware there is only one satellite that is deorbiting.
Are you aware that they are all deorbiting or burning limited fuel to maintain orbit?
So you have to be really unlucky to be accidentally killed by a piece of this while at home.
If you'd asked me ten minutes ago...
... I would have sworn that a drummer from Spinal Tap was killed by a re-entering satellite. However, I can't find any reference to this event.
It is possible that my source was the commentary track from the 1998 DVD, but is looking more likely that just imagined it.
https://zeroenthusiasm.tumblr.com/post/47032679583/list-of-spinal-tap-drummers-all-deceased
Remember kids, don't sell your dialysis machine to buy drugs.
Re: If you'd asked me ten minutes ago...
the reentering satellite effect?
Those one in 100 billion chances happen all the time.