US starts 'emergency' checks on cryptocurrency power use, citing winter power demands
- Reference: 1706906191
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2024/02/02/us_currency_power_bitcoin/
- Source link:
More specifically, the Energy Information Administration, part of the US Department of Energy, has been granted funding for a [1]six-month study into cryptocurrency energy use, which will involve collecting and analyzing grid utilization data from scores of mining operations.
The EIA justified
[2]PDF
the emergency nature of its investigation by arguing an ongoing bitter cold snap in the country along with a recent spike in the price of Bitcoin, and thus demand for the digital money, could cause an unnecessary drag on the US power grid this year and push up people's bills.[3]
"The price of Bitcoin has increased roughly 50 percent in the last three months, and higher prices incentivize more cryptomining activity, which in turn increases electricity consumption," wrote EIA administrator Joseph DeCarolis in a letter last month.
The combined effects of increased cryptomining and stressed electricity systems create heightened uncertainty in electric power markets
"At the time of this writing, much of the central United States is in the grip of a major cold snap that has resulted in high electricity demand. The combined effects of increased cryptomining and stressed electricity systems create heightened uncertainty in electric power markets, which could result in demand peaks that affect system operations and consumer prices."
Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin use a system known as "proof of work" to validate transactions and add them to the blockchain, producing currency for miners in the process. This requires performing calculations over and over to solve increasingly difficult mathematical puzzles that are primarily done by specialized mining hardware that consumes a decent chunk of electricity.
[4]
[5]
Ethereum, the second most popular cryptocurrency after Bitcoin by market cap, switched to a "proof of stake" system, which aims to use far less energy, in 2022. Various crypto-coins use either proof of work or proof of stake.
Digiconimist, which has been tracking Bitcoin energy usage for years, [6]claims the electrical energy used by Bitcoin miners right now amounts to an estimated 138 TWh per year, and topped out in the first half of 2022 at 205 TWh per year. A single Bitcoin transaction apparently eats up around 762.89 kWh - the same amount of energy the average US household would use in 26.15 days.
[7]
Of course, all that power consumption generates a lot of heat, which means water usage for cooling and whatnot is [8]absurd as well. A single Bitcoin transaction, Digiconimist claims, uses 12,023 litres of H 2 O - about the amount you'd find in a modest backyard above-ground pool – while the entire global Bitcoin mining industry is said to use around the same amount of water in a year as Switzerland.
The energy usage of cryptocurrency networks rises and falls with prices. With Bitcoin's value on a continual climb for much of 2023 and into this year, energy consumption by miners is only on the rise.
Taking a quick first look
The EIA will begin sending surveys to 82 cryptomining firms in the United States next week, which it said will be required to respond with details of their energy usage, including any electricity generated for themselves.
"We have developed general estimates of electricity use by US cryptocurrency mining operations by employing both top-down and bottom-up approaches," the administration [9]said in a preliminary analysis of cryptomining energy usage published on Thursday.
"In order to develop more rigorous estimates of electricity use by US cryptocurrency miners … we plan to begin collecting data on a monthly basis from February through July 2024."
[10]
The Register asked the EIA as to the ultimate goal of the survey - specifically if it plans to use the data to develop restrictions or regulations on power usage by cryptocurrency miners, but the agency declined to answer and said it was just getting a better understanding.
"EIA is in a unique position to collect information directly from the companies, and the data we collect will help our assessment," an EIA spokesperson told us.
[11]Biden proposes 30% tax on cryptominers' power bills
[12]Bitcoin energy consumption a feature, not a bug, says crypto-miner
[13]New York cracks down on carbon fuel-based crypto-mining operations
[14]US warns cryptominers must cut power use to avoid busting US carbon goals
The EIA told us it hopes to develop a base snapshot of cryptomining companies and their energy usage, quantify how much energy usage by identified miners fluctuates, pinpoint energy sources, and identify regions where cryptomining is concentrated.
"We will specifically focus on how the energy demand for cryptocurrency mining is evolving, identify geographic areas of high growth, and quantify the sources of electricity used to meet cryptocurrency mining demand," DeCarolis said in a [15]canned statement .
The EIA estimates that cryptocurrency mining is responsible for between 0.6 to 2.3 percent of all US electricity consumption. According to the watchdog, they've been hearing more concerns from grid operators since China [16]cracked down on cryptocurrency mining in 2021, causing operations to migrate outside the Middle Kingdom.
"Strains to the electricity grid during periods of peak demand, the potential for higher electricity prices, as well as effects on energy-related carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions" were all cited, the EIA said. "Grid planners have also begun to express concern."
The approval for the EIA's cryptocurrency mining survey expires on July 31, 2024. The findings from the next six months will determine whether the agency gets funding to carry on collecting and assembling this kind of data, we're told. ®
Get our [17]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=202401-1905-002
[2] https://regmedia.co.uk/2024/02/02/doe-crypto-mining-survey-justification-letter.pdf
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Zb10GGT@GgReI3ybYSbZNwAAAVA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Zb10GGT@GgReI3ybYSbZNwAAAVA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Zb10GGT@GgReI3ybYSbZNwAAAVA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Zb10GGT@GgReI3ybYSbZNwAAAVA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2023/11/30/bitcoin_mining_water_consumption/
[9] https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61364
[10] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Zb10GGT@GgReI3ybYSbZNwAAAVA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/04/us_crypto_electricity_bill_tax/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/14/bitcoin_energy_consumption/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/23/new_york_crypto_mining_ban/
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2022/09/09/crypto_mining_regulations_us/
[15] https://www.eia.gov/pressroom/releases/press550.php
[16] https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/19/china_cryptocurrency_crackdown/
[17] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Pay as you go
If it risks causing power outages during periods of high demand while accomplishing nothing of value then it is a problem for everyone. At least EV charging is accomplishing something of value in terms of reducing demand for fossil fuels. There would be reason for power companies to upgrade grids as necessary to support increased demand due to EV charging as that's a use case that will always be around and grow in the future.
There is no business case to upgrade grids due to cryptomining, as there is no way of knowing future demand patterns for it or if bitcoin will even be a thing in the future - maybe the bubble will burst for good, maybe laws will be passed cracking down on it due to its main use being for crimes like ransomware, drug sales, and money laundering.
Re: Pay as you go
If it risks causing power outages during periods of high demand while accomplishing nothing of value
That is highly subjective. It clearly creates value to people who are using it.
If there is a problem with power outages then perhaps energy companies should change their fee structure to afford improvements in infrastructure or invest the money they already have better - rather than ensuring their shareholders can buy another yacht.
There is no business case to upgrade grids due to cryptomining, as there is no way of knowing future demand patterns for it or if bitcoin will even be a thing in the future
You can say that about almost everything that uses energy.
Re: Pay as you go
"If they are paying the bills then what's the issue?"
Reductio ad absurdum: If someone (e.g. Elon Musk) decided to build a giant electric powered heater in the middle of the desert, as a means of spending down his billions, would you still say it was an OK use of resources, so long as he was willing to pay the electric bill ?
There has to be some point where the cost/benefit ratio gets examined for the use of shared resources, especially ones that contribute to anthropogenic climate change.
There is no inherent need for cryptocurrency to use "proof of work", other methods exist to provide digital money without the enormous power requirement...
Here's a couple of possibly relevant links...
[1]https://nextbillionseconds.com/2024/02/02/cryptonomics-final-so-long-and-thanks-for-all-the-grift
[2]https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61364
[1] https://nextbillionseconds.com/2024/02/02/cryptonomics-final-so-long-and-thanks-for-all-the-grift/
[2] https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61364
Maybe we should just spend the money going into this investigation on just fixing the power grid so it can handle the demands of today and the future, and making it more "green" so that it's not a big deal if someone wants to use and pay for more power. Just assume we need massive upgrades based on the trends of total power usage increase, peaks, etc. It shouldn't matter what specifically the power is being used on unless they're looking to start regulating and banning particular activities in order to reduce the load because the power companies would rather hold onto more profit than spend it to fix the problems.
Also I can't possibly believe that a single Bitcoin TRANSACTION by itself uses so much power it takes an entire swimming pool to cool the equipment that handled it, unless you're counting the fact that the equipment was already running and generating heat anyway and not splitting up that heat output with all the other things the equipment had been doing or just the idle power draw, and including every piece of equipment along the entire chain between endpoints and servers and network equipment. Perhaps MINING a coin could use that much power, attributing all the power used by the equipment solely to that coin (and since the equipment wouldn't even be turned on otherwise, that seems valid).
I don’t think you appreciate just how much computing power it takes to do a bitcoin transaction. This is not like an SQL INSERT statement on a bank database. All these computers all over the world can only do about 7 transactions per second.
Also, there is no such thing as idle power draw in a mining rig, they run at maximum output 24/7.
Crazy power consumption
Last report I read, a recent one from one of the big consultants, said cryptocurrency accounts for 0.5% of global electricity consumption (might be energy consumption, even. Can’t remember).
Either way, that’s a huuuuuuge amount just to provide a few currencies. It’s not heavy industry, it’s not transport, it’s not manufacture. It’s crazy.
Edit: it’s 0.55% of electricity consumption, but only Bitcoin.
https://kpmg.com/kpmg-us/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2023/bitcoins-role-esg-imperative.pdf
Re: Crazy power consumption
It’s not heavy industry, it’s not transport, it’s not manufacture.
That's a poor argument, unless you want to look at energy consumption generated by the likes of Netflix? It's even worse as couch potatoes watching boxset after boxset are not exactly producing anything apart from waste.
Re: Crazy power consumption
Sure, let’s make the comparison.
A single bitcoin transaction uses the same amount of energy as watching 17000 hours (2 years) of Netflix.
Re: Crazy power consumption
It's a poor comparison. You may want to look at energy consumption generated by Netflix as a whole.
You would most likely find that energy use by Netflix alone is much higher and most people I think would agree that world would be better off without Netflix.
WTF
So at UK electricity prices it costs over £200 in electricity to process a single bitcoin transaction?
Where the hell is the value in a "currency" that costs (someone, somewhere) that much to process...?
People complain when Visa/MasterCard/AmEx charge a few percent on card transactions.
As for the people who don't seem to see a problem with this crypto bullshit consuming vast quantities of electricity: so long as any real value-producing consumer of electricity is required to use carbon-emitting energy because there isn't enough zero carbon on the grid, this shit is literally directly contributing to global warming.
There's a whole lot of bad, and literally nothing good about crypto, aside for a few scammy crypto-bros making a mint at the expense of others and the planet.
Pay as you go
If they are paying the bills then what's the issue?
Or are they setting a precedent for looking into power use of EV vehicles in the future?