News: 1705593609

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Microsoft 365's add-on avalanche is putting the squeeze on customers

(2024/01/18)


Microsoft's demands for extra cash from customers wishing to use Copilot for Microsoft 365 has highlighted a growing problem – the number of paid add-ons.

The cloud and software biz is now the world's most valuable company with a market capitalization of $2.89 trillion, just ahead of Apple with $2.82 trillion. Quarter after quarter, Microsoft has reported increases in revenues, yet it is still squeezing customers for more cash to the delight of shareholders.

Analysts at Directions on Microsoft [1]have noted that extra cost features on top of a base E3 or E5 subscription have grown more than 4X over the last four years. According to the group, in 2019, it found 14 add-ons. By the end of 2023, the figure had risen to 61.

[2]

And those E3 and E5 subscriptions aren't cheap. Depending on the deal secured with Microsoft, an enterprise can expect to pay around $36 (£33.10) per user per month – with an annual commitment – for an E3 subscription or $57 (£52.40) per user per month for E5. While both include a set of productivity applications and E5 adds some security services, there is still plenty missing from the toy box.

[3]

[4]

You want Copilot? That'll be another $30 per user per month. Teams Premium? We'll need another $10 per user per month. Perhaps some Defender Vulnerability Management?... and so it goes on.

"Microsoft is making more and more new features and apps available as paid add-ons for Microsoft 365 customers," notes Mary Jo Foley, enterprise strategy expert at Directions on Microsoft. And like many parents and kids discover the hard way, when the expected batteries aren't included with your new, pricey toy, no one is happy."

[5]Insurance website's buggy API leaked Office 365 password and a giant email trove

[6]Microsoft prices new Copilots for individuals and small biz vastly higher than M365 alone

[7]Data loss prevention isn't rocket science, but NASA hasn't made it work in Microsoft 365

[8]Microsoft 365 Copilot 'generally available' – if you can afford 300 seats

Analyst Michael Cherry added: "Microsoft and other cloud vendors promised the cloud would help reduce IT costs, not just in terms of on-premises hardware and software, but also in terms of IT headcount. It now seems that the cloud is the cause of significant new costs."

In the past, enterprises could simply buy perpetual licenses and be done. However, over recent years, Microsoft has encouraged those enterprises to move to a subscription model, resulting in [9]lawsuits against the company in the UK.

[10]

While Microsoft will contend that relentlessly adding extras is improving value because it allows customers to choose only the services they require for specific staff, it is hard to avoid the feeling that the company is nickel-and-diming by charging for so many services.

Microsoft's insistence on the inclusion of AI and Copilot also raises the specter of another tier – perhaps an E7, if Microsoft sticks with its naming convention – that might include more services as standard, except at a higher price. The Directions team [11]said that just such a bundle might be lurking around the corner.

Whether it is easier to continue with the extra cost add-ons or opt for a hypothetical bundle will depend on how brave IT is feeling at budget time. ®

Get our [12]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.directionsonmicrosoft.com/blog/paid-add-ons-to-microsoft-365-are-multiplying-rapidly-whats-a-customer-to-do/

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/saas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZalZPRmsAApIVysfyA9YqQAAAYw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/saas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZalZPRmsAApIVysfyA9YqQAAAYw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/saas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZalZPRmsAApIVysfyA9YqQAAAYw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/18/ttibi_office_buggy/

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/15/copilot_pro_small_biz/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/21/nasa_oig_privacy_review/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2023/11/03/microsoft_365_copilot/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/19/valuelicensing_files_a_summary_judgment/

[10] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/saas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZalZPRmsAApIVysfyA9YqQAAAYw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[11] https://www.directionsonmicrosoft.com/blog/is-microsoft-365-e7-waiting-in-the-wings/

[12] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Revenue Stream

Wally Dug

Analyst Michael Cherry added: "Microsoft and other cloud vendors promised the cloud would help reduce IT costs, not just in terms of on-premises hardware and software, but also in terms of IT headcount. It now seems that the cloud is the cause of significant new costs."

And therein lies the rub. In the good old days, Microsoft got its revenue stream with a new release of Windows (both server and client) every few years followed by a new release of Office. With the cloud, that made way for the subscription model.

But, if you provide a stable, unchanging platform that suits your customers, the revenue stream levels off, which doesn't suit your shareholders. Each new addition to M365 is simply the equivalent of an "upgrade" which makes your shareholders happy, sure, but what about the customer whose "simple to manage" estate is ever more complicated to manage, licence and afford?

As my grandmother used to say

Anonymous Coward

stupid is not the one who asks the price, it is the one who pays the price.

Ripped out O365 last year

Anonymous Coward

Honestly, it doesn't do anything for a normal user that Google can't do.

This is going to be an ongoing theme of the decade. As companies struggle to breakeven with BAU, they will find more and more ways to make everything an "extra".

Ryanair are the logical destination for this behaviour.

This is what happens when you start slashing to sign people up 10 years ago.

See also: Adobe.

"Premium" is an artificial construct?

thondwe

With some of these "Premium" things - Teams, SharePoint, etc it's hard to work out functionally is premium at all - corporate branding for teams for example - should be standard? Then there's the standard big bundles - a mishmash of stuff you wanted, and stuff you never did - Power BI or MS Access (really!) for every staff member

Co-pilot I can see as a cost due to the CPU/GPU/NPU running costs - but the model of per user for a large org is just too expensive - needs a Power BI Premium style shared capacity licence?

Really need a customisable bundle option - add in the discounts based on simple basis of buying more...

Oh - and if you need something, then you HAVE to buy it for a year not just the months you use it!

Licencing people - Golgafrincham B Ark anyone

Fibs

Rich 2

"Microsoft and other cloud vendors promised the cloud would help reduce IT costs, not just in terms of on-premises hardware and software, but also in terms of IT headcount. It now seems that the cloud is the cause of significant new costs."

If I remember correctly, this particular scenario is called "lying"

noun: the telling of lies, or false statements; untruthfulness

adjective: telling or containing lies; deliberately untruthful; deceitful; false

The price of success in philosophy is triviality.
-- C. Glymour.