Elon Musk made 1 in 3 Trust and Safety staff ex-X employees, it emerges
- Reference: 1704987066
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2024/01/11/elon_musk_twitter_safety_cull/
- Source link:
That 30 percent cut includes shedding 80 percent of its safety engineers and half of the moderators, according to a [1]report from Australia's eSafety Commissioner.
Evidence of the cull emerged after the independent body, which scrutinizes and regulates what Australians get up to online, issued a legal notice to X Corp in June last year. Under the nation's Online Safety Act, it requested specific information about what Twitter/X was doing to meet the Australian government's Basic Online Safety Expectations in relation to online hate and to enforce its own hateful conduct policy.
[2]
In its response, X said that within the cuts to Trust and Safety staff, it also reduced the number of safety engineers by 80 percent. The company additionally revealed the number of moderators it directly employs were cut by half, while the number of global public policy staff have also been reduced by almost 80 percent, according to a document published by the Commissioner today.
[3]
[4]
While reports of cuts to staff in online moderation and safety have emerged since Musk acquired Twitter for $44 billion in October 2022, this is the first time it has given specific figures on where the ax fell, the Australian commissioner said.
As well as cutting safety and moderation staff, X Corp also let 6,100 banned accounts back on the platform in Australia. Media reports have suggested 62,000 suspended accounts were reinstated worldwide. These accounts have not been placed under any additional scrutiny, X Corp confirmed.
[5]
eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said: "It's almost inevitable that any social media platform will become more toxic and less safe for users if you combine significant reductions to safety and local public policy personnel with thousands of account reinstatements of previously banned users. You're really creating a bit of a perfect storm."
[6]SEC Twitter hijacked to push fake news of hotly anticipated Bitcoin ETF approval
[7]X's 2024 plans include peer-to-peer payments in app push
[8]Everyone's suing AI over text and pics. But music? You ain't seen nothing yet
[9]X-ploited: Mandiant restores hijacked Twitter account after attempted crypto heist
In Australia, a recent eSafety study found that First Nations youth are three times more likely to experience hate speech online than their non-indigenous counterparts. X Corp stated it had not formally engaged with any First Nations organizations after it began laying off safety staff and receiving the legal notice.
Globally, other groups have become alarmed at lack of moderation and safety on the X platform.
In September, [10]a group of 100 Jewish leaders published an open letter criticizing X and its owner for enabling a "new stage of antisemitic discourse."
In November, the [11]platform sued pressure group Media Matters after it accused the site of allowing antisemitic posts next to advertising. X alleged that the group "manipulated" data in an attempt to "destroy" the platform formerly known as Twitter.
[12]
In December, [13]X earned the dubious honor of being the first online platform to have formal Digital Services Act (DSA) proceedings launched against it, with the European Commission accusing it of disseminating illegal content among other violations of the recently enacted rule.
X may be in violation of five DSA articles "linked to risk management, content moderation, dark patterns, advertising transparency and data access for researchers," EC EVP Margrethe Vestager said in a statement. ®
Get our [14]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.esafety.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/report-reveals-the-extent-of-deep-cuts-to-safety-staff-and-gaps-in-twitter/xs-measures-to-tackle-online-hate
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZaAeuRFYancHB1hCMqp9QAAAAIU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZaAeuRFYancHB1hCMqp9QAAAAIU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZaAeuRFYancHB1hCMqp9QAAAAIU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZaAeuRFYancHB1hCMqp9QAAAAIU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/09/sec_bitcoin_etf_hacked/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/09/xs_2024_plans/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/08/copyright_music_ai/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/04/mandiant_restores_hijacked_x_account/
[10] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/elon-musk-antisemitism-on-x-twitter-jewish-leaders/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2023/11/21/x_sues_media_matters/
[12] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZaAeuRFYancHB1hCMqp9QAAAAIU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/18/eu_x_investigation/
[14] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Yet....
But it's letting the wrong ones speak!
eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said: "It's almost inevitable that any social media platform will become more toxic and less safe for users if you combine significant reductions to safety and local public policy personnel with thousands of account reinstatements of previously banned users. You're really creating a bit of a perfect storm."
WTF is a 'local public policy' person, and why did Twatter need thousands of them? Why not just a few lawyers who can determine if the speech is legal, or not. And if the thousands of previously banned users were banned for political reasons, isn't restoring free speech a good thing?
Why is it so many politicians are so opposed to allowing free speech? And now let the downvotes begin, to demonstrate what happens when you let fascists determine the rules. Or ratios..
Re: Yet....
WTF is a 'local public policy' person, and why did Twatter need thousands of them?
Evidently to make Twitter comply with each country's laws around the world.
Why not just a few lawyers who can determine if the speech is legal, or not.
Can a few lawyers in the US check thousands of messages from around the world which are flagged every day?
And if the thousands of previously banned users were banned for political reasons, isn't restoring free speech a good thing?
[1]Elon Musk bans several prominent journalists from Twitter, calling into question his commitment to free speech
[2]Elon Musk’s Twitter Is Still Banning Journalists for Simply Doing Their Job
Funny.
[1] https://edition.cnn.com/2022/12/15/media/twitter-musk-journalists-hnk-intl/index.html
[2] https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/04/elon-musk-twitter-still-banning-journalists
Re: Yet....
Funny.
Indeed-
But, in a series of sporadic tweets, Musk claimed that the journalists had violated his new “doxxing” policy by sharing his “exact real-time” location, amounting to what he described as “assassination coordinates.”
Old news it seems. But good'ol Twatter never had a problem with doxxing, providing it was the 'far right' being doxxed. Not sure what the Vanity Fair article was about given most of it was hidden behind their godawful and probably non-GDPR compliant cookie acceptance filter.
Much funnier is the new wave of exploding heads Musk has caused by pointing out that 'cis' (Not Co-op Insurance Services) is heterophobic. But I see the hate speech thumbs are getting their usual workout..
Re: Yet....
If right wingers were getting banned, it's because they're the absolutely worst when it comes to posting racist, homophobic and transphobic crap. And now that they're back, it as become an ever worse cesspool that it ever was before Elmo took over. There's a reason advertisers have run away from the site.
Re: Yet....
"racist, homophobic and transphobic"
Wow, you managed to site the holy trinity of slurs.. I am surprised that colonialism wasn't added to the trio....
Re: Yet....
"Elon Musk bans several prominent journalists from Twitter, calling into question his commitment to free speech"
"Elon Musk’s Twitter Is Still Banning Journalists for Simply Doing Their Job"
Did you actually read the articles that you made links too, if you did then what exactly did you find surprising about Musk being upset about those reporters ?
One reporter was doxxing Musk in real time and the other was apparently banned for reporting positively about Matt Walsh's hacker.
Trust and Safety staff
We're all mostly all grown-ups. We can make our own minds up as to the veracity of posts. If you need protecting from a Xitter post then maybe you shouldn't be let out unsupervised.
--
Dr. Warren: Why, oh why did you do it Jerry.
Jerry Hickfang: Mr. Whiskers, he makes me do bad things.
Re: Trust and Safety staff
You've got the wrong end of the stick, these people were not there to opine or adjudicate on the veracity of posts, simply to try and keep at bay the howling abusive morons who flock to any platform that lets them spew their limited brains out.
If people tried voicing or sharing many of things that appear on social media in a normal bar, they'd get a probably well deserved punch in the face. Online that moderating influence doesn't exist, that's what the moderators were there for.
Yet....
It's still there. It's still widely used and will continue to hold a dominant position for quite some time, I suspect.