Another airline finds loose bolts in Boeing 737-9 during post-blowout fleet inspections
- Reference: 1704814205
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2024/01/09/united_alaska_737_loose_bolts/
- Source link:
United Airlines and Alaska Airlines, the latter of which operated [1]the flight on Friday that experienced the three-mile high emergency exit blowout shortly after takeoff, independently reported "loose hardware" discovered around the emergency exit plugs on their 737 Max 9 aircraft.
"Since we began preliminary inspections on Saturday, we have found instances that appear to relate to installation issues in the door plug – for example, bolts that needed additional tightening," a United spokesperson told The Register . Alaska Airlines said in an [2]update regarding the incident that "some loose hardware was visible on some aircraft" around "the area in question."
[3]
Both airlines said their 737 Max 9 fleets will remain grounded until FAA-mandated inspections, repairs, and recertification is complete. The timeline for the process is unclear, and in the meantime United has been forced to cancel 200 Max 9 flights, a few of which it was able to reschedule by switching to other aircraft. Cancellations are expected to continue today, United said.
[4]
[5]
United operates 79 and [6]Alaska Air 65 of the 737 Max 9 aircraft, making them the only major US airlines with this model in their fleets. Panama's national carrier Aeromexico, Turkish Airlines, and Icelandair also fly smaller numbers of the aircraft.
According to aerospace news outlet The Air Current, the location of loose parts on the United Airlines aircraft is relatively [7]inconsistent , with one aircraft having loose bolts on the lower hinge of the plug door, leading to the hinges not being fully seated. On another aircraft, United reportedly found loose bolts and screws on forward guide fittings and lower hinge brackets on the plug.
[8]
The inspections performed by United and Alaska were done over the weekend preliminarily, we note, and it wasn't until Monday that the FAA [9]approved a method to comply with the emergency airworthiness inspection requirements issued on January 6.
The plug blowout, and accompanying firestorm of negative media attention, is unlikely to help Boeing or the 737 Max's reputations. It was just a few years ago that a pair of 737 Max crashes (in earlier variants of the model) grounded the fleet and led to a [10]damning report that found the incidents, which killed 346 people, were partly the result of serious oversight failures with a side dose of safety concern issues.
[11]Boeing to pay SEC $200m to settle charges it misled investors over 737 MAX safety
[12]Apple sets new 16,000-foot iPhone drop test after 737 fuselage fail
[13]Boeing 737 Max will return to flight after software updates, says EU's aviation regulator
[14]Boeing fined $17m after fitting uncertified sensors to 737 Max and NG airliners for 4 years
When asked to comment on the matter, Boeing only referred us to its 737-9 incident update [15]page , which contains little detail about the blowout or the findings from preliminary investigations.
"As operators conduct the required inspections, we are staying in close contact with them and will help address any and all findings," Boeing said. "We regret the impact this has had on our customers and their passengers."
Boeing will host an all-hands meeting today at its factory in Renton, Washington, to address the aerospace company's response to the incident and its "commitment to safety, quality, integrity and transparency," said CEO Dave Calhoun.
[16]
"While we've made progress in strengthening our safety management and quality control systems and processes in the last few years, situations like this are a reminder that we must remain focused on continuing to improve every day." ®
Get our [17]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/08/boeing_737_max_9_airplanes/
[2] https://news.alaskaair.com/alaska-airlines/operations/as-1282/
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZZ17thFYancHB1hCMqo5sgAAAIk&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZZ17thFYancHB1hCMqo5sgAAAIk&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZZ17thFYancHB1hCMqo5sgAAAIk&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.barrons.com/articles/boeing-max-737-9-planes-alaska-united-airlines-copa-b30b8425
[7] https://theaircurrent.com/feed/dispatches/united-finds-loose-bolts-on-plug-doors-during-737-max-9-inspections/
[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZZ17thFYancHB1hCMqo5sgAAAIk&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[9] https://www.faa.gov/newsroom/updates-grounding-boeing-737-max-9-aircraft
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2021/12/15/boeing_737_max_senate_report/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2022/09/23/boeing_sec_200m/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/08/apple_iphone_16000_drop/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2020/11/25/easa_737_max_return/
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/27/boeing_fined_737_max_uncertified_hugs_sensors/
[15] https://www.boeing.com/737-9-updates/index.page#/contact
[16] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZZ17thFYancHB1hCMqo5sgAAAIk&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[17] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Loctite
Even more expensive is the damage being done to the reputation of Boeing in general and the 737 Max in particular.
Re: Loctite
Never mind how much of a hit the FAA reputation is taking
Re: Loctite
“ reputation” ????
Surprised to hear they had any left!
Alaska Air
Please don't refer to Alaska Airlines as 'Alaska Air', just because you can't be bothered typing an extra 5 characters. It's that kind of lazy journalism that leads to airline names getting mangled, or worse, mis-associated with other airlines with similar-sounding names but which are not related at all.
Re: Alaska Air
That the Alaska Airlines whose website is literally "alaskaair.com"? Seems they're OK with the short version...
Re: Alaska Air
Alaska Airlines is fully owned by the Alaska Air Group, Inc., a holding company, with the same people at the helm of both entities.
So, "lazy" is the person not doing their research prior to posting
A gross understatement?
'Not fully tightened' meant [1]in one case ' United found that the bolts that affix the lower hinge of the plug door were not fully seated, and that the washers on the bolts could “spin ” '
Doesn't that suggest serious negligence at both assembly and inspection?
[1] https://theaircurrent.com/feed/dispatches/united-finds-loose-bolts-on-plug-doors-during-737-max-9-inspections/
Re: A gross understatement?
It may suggest that, yes...
Re: A gross understatement?
Maybe it suggests that "the area in question" should be the entire aircraft when conducting these inspections.
Re: A gross understatement?
Possibly - there are, I think, 3 options:
1. They weren't tightened/installed properly at the factory and no further inspections have been done since it went into service, so a flaw in assembly.
2. They've come loose and haven't been picked up at an inspection, which would indicate poor maintenance
3. They've come loose between inspections; e.g. you're supposed to inspect these bolts every 200 flight hours and they've come loose after 100 hours, so there's a gap between "bolts becoming loose" and the next inspection. That would indicate a flaw in the maintenance schedules or design/installation of the bolts.
In any event, something will get added to the maintenance checklists but I'd be worried about any other bolts which could either be loose already or could come loose and cause another incident. The relevant authorities will no doubt be working at figuring out which of the above applies and sorting out the details.
Re: A gross understatement?
So from what I have been able to find out.
Spirit AeroSystems used to install the plug doors and fully torque the bolts, they would then paint a line on the bolt so that you could visually see that it had not moved.
But Boeing asked them to stop torqueing the bolts as they wanted to be able to do the adjustments themselves and be able to remove the plug so they could use it as a larger entrance whilst installing the interior fittings.
Re: A gross understatement?
" they would then paint a line on the bolt so that you could visually see that it had not moved "
A crude and inaccurate method. Here in the UK the wheel nuts of every public service vehicle and HGV are fitted with [1] bright yellow rigid rotation indicators with obvious pointers . They only cost a few pence (cents) so why not use them on critical fasteners on planes?
[1] https://www.chevronwarehouse.co.uk/wheel-nut-indicators?brandId=0&subGroupId=0
Re: A gross understatement?
Because a bit of plastic is one more thing to fall off and get stuck in some mechanism or block some switch. Paint is simple and effective.
Re: A gross understatement?
"Doesn't that suggest serious negligence at both assembly and inspection?"
Like they care, no matter how many people their negligence murders no one goes to jail for it. I have for years advocated for the corporate death penalty along with personal one for those in charge when they murder someone through their actions. That will get the attention of the parasite corporations and their scumbag leaders if both die for their part in it.
Loose bolts. Could this be the first time Boeing HASN'T screwed up?
When I was a student on my industrial placement a production engineer once spent a while explaining the types and uses of flat, star, crinkle and spring washers. It's one of the many things I wished I'd paid a lot more attention to when I was younger.
I hope they also covered
the correct use of a torque wrench?
I remember from my time at Kingston (Hawker Siddley) that getting the right torque settings were just as critical as using the correct washers.
Alaska Airlines were lucky that no one was seriously injured. Boeing seems to have caught the Microsoft disease and adopted minimal QC on their output.
I get the feeling that a lot more boeing airframes are going to be grounded. Then the lawyers will take over and there goes the 'C-level' execs bonus for the foreseeable future. I expect the stockholders to point the finger and heads will roll (All protected by golden parachutes naturally)
BAU for Boring then....?
Re: I hope they also covered
> Boeing seems to have caught the Microsoft disease
Boeing caught it from McDonnell-Douglas, who they bought, and apparently the old McD beancounters are now in charge.
Various types and uses of flat, star, crinkle and spring washers. It's one of the many things I wished I'd paid a lot more attention to when I was younger. [1]Try this
[1] https://www.bolts.co.uk/what-are-the-different-types-of-washers
Should've tried an impact wrench?
Boeing said[,] "We regret the impact this has had on our customers and their passengers share price." FTFY
Re: Should've tried an impact wrench?
As an aircraft manufacturer I would think that avoiding any kind of impact would be their main job.
Shameful
It's shameful how Boeing's management is running the company into the ground. They know that they can do whatever they please because the company is "too big to fail" and too important to the U.S. economy. If Boeing goes bankrupt the U.S. government will bail them out, just as it did with the Big Banks.
The company makes a crap product which sees take up because there are few other vendors that make comparable products and Airbus is already booked to capacity. If the Chinese Comac C919 gets certified in the West and operates admirably for a couple of years I see Boeing going under quickly.
Re: Shameful
> It's shameful how Boeing's management is running the company into the ground.
It's shameful how Boeing's management is flying the company into the ground.
FTFY.
It's not a question of whose habitat it is, it's a question of how fast you hit it!
"We regret the impact this has had on our customers and their passengers, especially when they hit the ground".
Makes me feel better about my work
I work for a much smaller, lower stakes, company that makes lil doodads that go in private aircraft. Think Cessnas or a North Sea rig chopper.
These little doodads are required to be fully EASA compliant - and thus CAA and FAA by harmonisation - which involves lengthy design processes detailing the exact torque value of every damn nut and bolt that assembles them as well as calibration records for the driver that torques the nuts *ahem.*
It's honestly bewildering how this can have occurred, as larger companies like Boeing are under much deeper scrutiny with the regulators practically living in there. Then again, maybe that's the issue? Either way, it makes me feel top-of-my-field that I'm Part21 compliant in a way Boeing don't seem to be actually capable of.
Purely through torqueing some damned bolts correctly.
Re: Makes me feel better about my work
It's honestly bewildering how this can have occurred, as larger companies like Boeing are under much deeper scrutiny with the regulators practically living in there.
Hasn't the FAA switched to self-certification for the big manufacturers because of budget cutbacks and subsequent lack of staff?
'Boeing will host an all-hands meeting today at its factory'
Well, excuse me, but IMPORTANT people don't work in or ever visit the factory, corporate HQ is elsewhere probably.
In an extraordinary turn of events, Boeing Commercial's president actually _cancelled_ an executive retreat with his VPs so that he could travel to the Renton factory to fly the flag, as it were.
The Boeing execs will probably give themselves a $100 million bonus because they did such an admirable job running the company. Not!
"Waiter, there's a fly in my soup!"
"Well don't shout too loudly sir, they'll all want one!"
I wonder how many other models/brands/types of aircraft have odd bolts loose here and there? Expect another me too epidemic.
I do hope Embraer, Airbus, et al. are watching this very closely and learn a lesson by proxy.
This industry has no room or compassion for loose QA or a shoddy, profits-first attitude.
As Richard Feynman famously said: “nature cannot be fooled”.
BOEING... or Boding?
used to stand for "Bits of Engine In Neighbours Garden". Now doors?
Loctite
Loctite is expensive