News: 1702621989

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Is it 2000 or 2023? Get ready for AI-anchored news again

(2023/12/15)


A startup with aspirations of becoming a trusted global news brand is planning to launch a service delivering curated content – written by AI and delivered by artificial anchors.

Channel 1 demoed its tech with a half-hour [1]preview of its AI-generated news on Twitter this week, with AI anchors describing the startup's plans and reading some sample news items.

(It's causing some of us to remember [2]Ananova from the year 2000, an over-hyped computer-animated-and-voiced news anchor run by a UK newswire. She was later [3]flogged off to a telco and ultimately dumped.)

[4]

The LA-based virtual station claims all news it presents will be fact-checked by humans to ensure accuracy before being placed in the virtual mouths of its artificial newsreaders.

[5]

[6]

The content on [7]Channel 1 "relies on trusted sources and fact checking and uses AI to give you news the way you want it – personalized, localized and distilled," one of the virtual talking heads recited, with another trying to dispel fears by noting that "journalism's core values of integrity and accountability are at the heart of everything we do."

Channel 1 plans to source news from a variety of places – including several big-name news agencies that founders Adam Mosam and Scott Zabielski told The Register in an interview today they'll make public next month. The photo-channel also plans to source stories from a network of vetted independent journalists, and eventually wants its AI to be able to formulate stories from fact-based documents like government reports, SEC filings and court cases. The pair told us AI is particularly good at generating news from simple fact-based items like those, but it will still use human editors to clean the stories up.

[8]

Along with adapted and remixed stories, the channel will also use AI to generate images to "create footage of events where cameras were not able to capture the action." One of the AI anchors likened the use of AI images to courtroom sketches that "aren't a literal depiction of actual events but can still provide important information and nuance to a news report." Channel 1 promised all AI-generated imagery will be labeled as such.

As for the news itself, sources will be cited on Channel 1 in a manner similar to how they're cited on existing news channels, we're told – with text in the corner indicating whence it came.

"We're starting with news vetted from trusted sources," Zabielski stated, adding that the startup wants to earn audience trust by delivering trustworthy news free of AI hallucinations. "We're only going to get one chance to do this right," Zabielski added.

[9]

The ultimate goal, Mosam and Zabielski explained, is to launch an app that delivers the aforementioned personalized news feed. But Channel 1's first iteration will be a free ad-supported streaming television (FAST) channel – essentially the digital version of a live TV station, where a few hours of news repeat on a loop.

[10]Don't be fooled: Google faked its Gemini AI voice demo

[11]Sports Illustrated boss fired – but it's totally nothing to do with AI fake news

[12]Publisher breaks news by using bots to write inaccurate stories

[13]China cracks down on AI-generated news anchors

The pair hope to launch the FAST channel in spring 2024, all delivered by soulless, dead-eyed avatars – though to be fair the "AInchors" (yes, really) are slightly more believable than that.

"The first phase of our launch was passing the uncanny valley and delivering something that's a believable thing to watch," Mosam told The Register – which the preview reel demonstrated. While the quality of the various AInchors that appear on the screen varies to a degree – with some using hand gestures that don't quite line up with their speech, and a few moments of stiff movement and out-of-sync audio – the star anchor in the video, a middle-age blonde woman, was fairly believable.

[14]

Nope, not a human – Click to enlarge

The startup, which currently has ten employees and is entirely self-funded, will need to scale to succeed, both founders admitted. The amount of content it can produce will be constrained by both its technology and the amount of fact-checking, re-writing and editing that can be done by each person in a single day. Channel 1 is in talks with investors right now and plans to begin larger fundraising efforts soon.

And we had to ask the question: Do we really need fake anchors – albeit ones that Channel 1 wants to develop with a sort of digital "personality" that can allow them to report from their own vantage point – reading regurgitated news that's tailored to each user?

Someone has to do it, Mosam told us. "This is coming … and we're doing our best to stand in front of a speeding train in the most responsible way possible," he declared.

"There will be plenty of cases where there's improper use, fraud, fake news and bad actors," Mosam predicted. "What we're trying to say is that we can be a responsible choice." ®

Get our [15]Tech Resources



[1] https://twitter.com/channel1_ai/status/1734591810033373231

[2] https://www.theregister.com/2000/04/19/ananova_speaks_cyberrubbish/

[3] https://www.theregister.com/2002/05/20/ananova_pushes_mobile_scraps_email/

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/bootnotes&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZXwx1BFYancHB1hCMqrSWgAAAIQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/bootnotes&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZXwx1BFYancHB1hCMqrSWgAAAIQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/bootnotes&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZXwx1BFYancHB1hCMqrSWgAAAIQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://www.channel1.ai/

[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/bootnotes&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZXwx1BFYancHB1hCMqrSWgAAAIQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/bootnotes&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZXwx1BFYancHB1hCMqrSWgAAAIQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/11/ai_in_brief/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/12/sports_illustrated_ceo_fired/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/19/cnet_reviewing_ai_authored_stories/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/16/china_crackdown_on_ai_generated_news/

[14] https://regmedia.co.uk/2023/12/14/channel-1-news-sample.jpg

[15] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



2000?

Kevin McMurtrie

Max Headroom fake AI from 1985 was more fun than 2023 clumsy AI.

Re: 2000?

Bebu

Max was at least amusing. I always thought he had a mischievous sparkle in his eye.

Probably an improvement on the current anchors - he could read total porkies and you wouldn't believe a word but on the other hand he could present the absolute bible truth and you still wouldn't believe a word. That is a result from my perspective.

Who knows he might reignite a spark of critical thought if only to have the punter wonder "is this box head having a lend of me?"

Actually... is Max a native born American? Just a thought.

Speaking of Ananova

Dan 55

Whatever happened to [1]Regina Eggbert ?

[1] https://www.theregister.com/2014/08/23/vulture_news_august_23/

Re: Speaking of Ananova

HuBo

That would have celebrated its 10th anniversary this coming August ... (a quick reboot might be in order!)!

God preserve us!

Anonymous Coward

First the Internet turns to shit, thanks Google. Then social, thanks Elon. Now this. It feels increasingly like we need to get back to typewriters.

Re: God preserve us!

Anonymous Coward

well, everything they try to turn into gold turns into turds. As if by magic.

Scrapers' Paradise

Martin an gof

Someone posting on Railforums [1]made a similar suggestion a couple of months back. Initially the forum posters found the idea appealing, but once it was revealed that the proposer was planning almost complete automation, gathering "news" stories from websites, social media and RSS feeds with little to no (human) editorial control, the mood changed somewhat. I think the OP was being a bit naïve about what was and was not legally possible and morally "right", and I don't think he's got very far with the plan yet.

M.

[1] https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/new-uk-rail-live-news-tv-show.256110/

Re: Scrapers' Paradise

Ken G

I guess they need to get a lawyer in to help.

all news it presents will be fact-checked by humans to ensure accuracy

sabroni

So, this brilliant technology creates data that has to be checked by a human.

Do we even remember why we built computers?

Clue: It wasn't so we had some more stuff to check.

Shout me up when AI can produce output that's reliable. Like my ZX81.

Hans Neeson-Bumpsadese

Out of curiosity I googled for ananova and found that there's actually still a news website with that name. Looking at some of the articles, I can't decide if they're real or generated by a bad AI. Take this for example...

https://ananova.news/prince-harry-duke-of-sussex-and-the-royal-family/

ananova.news

Bebu

《real or generated by a bad AI. 》

Just really bad either way.

GlobeLink News resurrected? - Gus' new gig.

Couldn't find the Dead Donkey story but I am sure its amongst all the other gems - under "Animals And Enviroiment" (sic)

"Farmers Double Headed Calf"

"Live Toucan Eggs Found In Woman’s Bra Doing Well After Hatching At Zoo"

Appears Kipling's six honest serving men have had an extended redundancy.

Riiiight...

Magani

"The LA-based virtual station claims all news it presents will be fact-checked by humans to ensure accuracy before being placed in the virtual mouths of its artificial newsreaders. "

Why is my Bovine Excrement Detector needle suddenly hitting 11? What could possibly go wrong?

claims all news it presents will be fact-checked by humans

Anonymous Coward

claims, will be, humans, aka promises promises.

List each check separately by bank number.