News: 1702580673

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Linux Kernel of the Beast 6.6.6 exorcised by angelic 6.6.7 update

(2023/12/14)


The kernel 6.6.6 version number delighted many a black-clad open source fan, but not for long. It's already been replaced with a more neighborly 6.6.7.

At the end of October, [1]Linux version 6.6 came out, and just over a couple of weeks later, it became the latest [2]long-term supported release . It's not always the case, but in recent years it's been common for the last complete point-release of the year to be declared a stable release that will get several years of updates. This also means that [3]August's kernel 6.5 , released on the project's 32nd birthday, is now at the end of its life. After 13 point releases, it won't be getting any more.

Stable kernel supremo Greg Kroah-Hartman [4]released version 6.6.5 last Friday, with over 100 changes. One of these was the same problematic back-port that also affected kernel 6.1.66, as we [5]reported earlier this week . A change to Wi-Fi handling depended on an earlier change that wasn't included in kernel 6.1.66 and led to the very rapid release of 6.1.67, with the wireless-breaking change removed again.

[6]Linux Mint 21.3 and Zorin 17 are beta buddies

[7]Kernel kerfuffle kiboshes Debian 12.3 release

[8]Systemd 255 is here with improved UKI support

[9]Veteran editors Notepad++ and Geany hit milestone versions

The same problem affected release 6.6.5, and just as in the older stable kernel series, the change was removed again the following working day. Monday (December 11) saw the release of the satanically significant [10]kernel 6.6.6 , backing out just that single change from the previous version. That made quite a few redditors [11]very happy , although Hacker News commenters were [12]less delighted . The omens were there to be seen, even [13]back in October when 6.6 appeared.

But now comes the bad news for all the spooky kids out there: the kernel bearing the Mark of the Beast didn't last long at all. By Wednesday (13 December), it had been superseded by [14]kernel 6.6.7 . This is a much bigger release, with [15]268 files changed , and a [16]hefty changelog , which by our count has 7,562 lines.

[17]

With such a short window of opportunity, it's no wonder there wasn't an update and re-release of [18]Ubuntu Satanic Edition . ®

Get our [19]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/30/linux_6_6_debuts/

[2] https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.6-Goes-LTS

[3] https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/28/linux_kernel_6_5_debuts/

[4] https://lwn.net/Articles/954111/

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/12/kernel_6_1_ext4_corruption/

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/12/mint_21_3_zorin_17/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/12/kernel_6_1_ext4_corruption/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/08/systemd_255_is_here/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/06/veteran_editors_notepad_and_geany/

[10] https://lwn.net/Articles/954453/

[11] https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/18fsw5h/finally_kernel_666_has_been_released/

[12] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38624506

[13] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33063480

[14] https://lwn.net/Articles/954990/

[15] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/diff/?id=v6.6.7&id2=v6.6.6&dt=2

[16] https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/ChangeLog-6.6.7

[17] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/oses&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZXuJFn@9QQDde10zCjziKQAAAEc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[18] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DerivativeTeam/Derivatives/Ubuntu%20Satanic%20Edition

[19] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Ubuntu Satanic's themes were great

Uncle Slacky

I wish someone would create modern versions of the themes. There were versions for early Gnome/GTK3 if you hunted around a bit, but nothing since. I haven't found any good red/grey (and non-flat!) themes to replace them.

cornetman

> neighborly

Looks weird. I'm sure there are some letters missing.

Fruit and Nutcase

It certainly doesn't look right (to right-pondians). Alas, El Reg editorial guidlines are these days left-pondian...

[1]https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/neighborly

[1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/neighborly

jake

Are you suggesting the author made an error? What a horror!

With that said, dropping the u was an allowed transgression on both sides of the pond until Webster tried to make it mandatory here in the US ... at which point, you Brits set back firmly on your heels and collectively said "what was good enough for Daddy ... ". This lead the the great British lexicographer Henry Watson Fowler to remark "The American abolition of -our in such words as honour and favour has probably retarded rather than quickened English progress in the same direction."

jake

Orly?

Off-by-one error

C R Mudgeon

6.6.6 should have been the version *with* the bug.

WiFi - what ?

Anonymous Coward

I have just persuaded my firm to switch to Ubuntu on some low spec machines that never once had a problem with WiFi under windows. Other issues, yes. But WiFi was rock solid.

4 hours later on Ubuntu 22.04 and it's like 2006 all over again. The WiFi just is not stable.

I don't need a lecture on network manager, or any other internecine linux discussions. I just want it working.

667

Paddy B

Fax number of the beast!

It's all because ...

jake

Friday the 13th fell on a Wednesday this month.

Incomplete

cjcox

666, while co-opted by "the beast" is man's number.

Which in all fairness, makes for even a better reason for Ubuntu to have exploited this.

But I do realize we have a "TV/movie" reading style when it comes to the Bible.

Re: Incomplete

Yet Another Anonymous coward

>we have a "TV/movie" reading style when it comes to the Bible.

Well the storyline is a bit children's cartoons

Revelation needed checksumming

Benegesserict Cumbersomberbatch

Many of the oldest manuscripts of the Revelation to St John the Shroomier give the number of the beast as 616, not 666. Might explain the wifi problems in 6.1.66 - it was an each-way bet.

Whether your covers star a male or a female, I read your magazine for the
articles
-- Leo Costales, in "Outside July 2005"