News: 1701768614

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Government and the latest tech don't mix, says UK civil servant of £11B ESN mess

(2023/12/05)


Opinion Earlier this year, the prime minister launched the UK government's plan to cement the nations place as "a science and technology superpower by 2030."

However, in the opinion of one of the government's most senior civil servants, the public sector and cutting-edge technology mix about as well as oil and water.

Speaking to Parliament's Home Affairs Committeelate last week, Sir Matthew Rycroft, permanent secretary at the Home Office, responded to a question about whether lessons could be learned from the disastrous upgrade to the blue-light emergency services voice and data network.

[1]

The ESN could be up to 12 years late and has seen its expected budget [2]more than double to £11 billion ($13.92 billion). But those concerned about the waste might be reassured to know that at least some collective knowledge has been acquired by the civil service along the way.

[3]

[4]

Sir Matthew mused that the thing "for me personally, is that the cutting edge of technology is not always the best place to be, if you are a government — not always, although sometimes it should be.

"On this sort of issue [ESN], there are some benefits in going quickly but not being at the absolute cutting edge of technology, because if you are at that edge you end up being buffeted by all the winds of where that technology goes.

[5]

"With the benefit of hindsight, it might have been better at the very beginning of this programme, several years ago, to wait a bit and use the existing Airwave programme for a bit longer, which as it happened is what we ended up doing anyway because of the delays. As the technology improves, you can then get the benefit of that technology. That is not a lesson that will always apply, I don't think, but it does in this case," he told MPs.

It's a typically British approach to muddling through, which might be best applied to rearranging a kitchen garden of some tumble-down country pile rather than a 21st-century communications network critical to human life. Nonetheless, the ESN might attract admiration for taking muddling through to a whole new epic scale.

Out with the old, in with the new... yes and the supplier

Adding to the technical delays to the project is a failure to anticipate the commercial consequences of the Home Office's project management on ESN. As both the supplier of the old system — Airwave, based on TETRA technology — and a significant chunk of the replacement ESN, Motorola represented such a potential for a conflict of interest that the the market regulator had to step in.

The [6]Competition and Markets Authority went on to observe that Airwave's market position gave it the "ability to price services above levels the CMA would expect to prevail in a competitive market and results in a detrimental effect on customers."

The regulator has proposed charge controls to limit the price by more than 40 percent. However, Airwave took the issue to the Competition Appeal Tribunal. The first hearing took place in early August, with a ruling to follow.

[7]

To prevent the CMA from forcing it to sell Airwave, Motorola walked away from its £400 million ($506 million) contract for ESN in November 2021. The Home Office is going through procurement to replace Motorola on Lot 2 of the contract and expects to appoint a new supplier in 2024.

[8]Airwave a 'license to print money' on legacy blue-light comms contract

[9]'There has never been a realistic plan' for UK's £11B Emergency Services Network

[10]Excess profits on Motorola's Airwave estimated to be £1.3B

[11]UK's Emergency Services Network unlikely to start operating until 2029

Rycroft assured MPs that the Home Office was "on track with that stage of the re-procurement" and would update them as soon as possible.

Home Affairs Committee member Simon Fell, a Conservative MP, pointed out that the government had written off £135 million ($157 million) "as a consequence of Motorola leaving the programme."

Rycroft assured MPs he did not "anticipate more write-offs at this stage."

He added: "We have been working hard with Motorola and other commercial partners to ensure that the vast majority of the investments that Motorola has made will be used in the future emergency services network." ®

Get our [12]Tech Resources



[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZW8C2NPFTgGmjQUGB07cBQAAAJI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[2] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/14/pac_emergency_services_network/

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZW8C2NPFTgGmjQUGB07cBQAAAJI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZW8C2NPFTgGmjQUGB07cBQAAAJI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZW8C2NPFTgGmjQUGB07cBQAAAJI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/04/airwave_profits/

[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZW8C2NPFTgGmjQUGB07cBQAAAJI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/04/airwave_profits/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/14/pac_emergency_services_network/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/22/excess_profits_motorola_airwave/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2023/04/06/emergency_services_network_2029/

[12] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Doctor Syntax

UK government's plan to cement the nations place as "a science and technology superpower by 2030."

And where, we ask, are the ministers with the qualifications and capability to do that?

I suppose thy might bring back Matt Hancock. After all he had his own app, didn't he. That should be good enough.

Noty again!

Will Godfrey

Rycroft assured MPs he did not "anticipate more write-offs at this stage."

I regard that statement as an absolute guarantee that there will be very many more write-offs.

Hot Air

elsergiovolador

Earlier this year, the prime minister launched the UK government's plan to cement the nations place as "a science and technology superpower by 2030."

Earlier this year prime minister needed yet another feel good slogan, cheers and pats on the back.

This government is all about hot air, doing nothing but protecting the interests of the rich.

Fortunately they are on the way out.

Re: Hot Air

Disgusted Of Tunbridge Wells

> Fortunately they are on the way out.

No they aren't. They've been in power since 1997 and they are showing no signs of giving it up any time soon. An alternative to the Uniparty is unlikely to break through in one election cycle.

Re: Hot Air

Hans Neeson-Bumpsadese

Earlier this year, the prime minister launched the UK government's plan to cement the nations place as "a science and technology superpower by 2030."

Earlier this year the prime minister remembered that he had friends who own science & technology companies, and so would benefit from being given some government-funded work.

Disgusted Of Tunbridge Wells

Government is a terrible way to do stuff, so let's vote for more of it.

Airwave might be more expensive than a sim only third party carrier contract

Anonymous Coward

but the infrastructure is also fundamentally designed to be reliable and resilient.

there is enough redundancy built in to most of the system to actually keep it running, and with portable base stations and self relaying capabilities - it's just a different beast.

It really shouldn't be a private company beholden to foreign debt manufacturers... but the cost would still be alot higher than many expect.

Re: Airwave might be more expensive than a sim only third party carrier contract

Anonymous Coward

It really shouldn't be a private company beholden to foreign debt manufacturers

Consider things like electricity generation and supply, gas supply, water supply and sewage treatment...all that critical national infrastructure stuff...we probably shouldn't be beholden to foreign ownership for that, but here we are :-/

Kane

"And where, we ask, are the ministers with the qualifications and capability to do that?"

Well, we got a [1]Minister for AI now, does that help?

Ah! Just noticed you've mentioned qualifications , sorry, can't help you there!

Damn! Also noticed you mentioned capability as well! Looks like we're fubar then!

[1] https://www.theregister.com/2023/11/17/uk_ai_regulation/

Don't tell me how hard you work. Tell me how much you get done.
-- James J. Ling