News: 1701242826

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

No link between internet use and poor mental health, according to Oxford boffins

(2023/11/29)


Increased use of the internet has not had a notably negative effect on mental health, according to a study combining data from millions of people across 168 countries.

The [1]study , titled "Global Well-Being and Mental Health in the Internet Age," examined material from prior research conducted between 2005 and 2022 that considered the mental well-being of more than two million individuals, plus another effort that considered rates of anxiety, depression, and self harm from 2000 to 2019.

The authors analyzed both datasets by demographic and location, compared them to local internet usage rates, and found no evidence "that the internet and technologies enabled by it, such as smartphones with internet access, are actively promoting or harming either well-being or mental health globally."

[2]

"We looked very hard for a 'smoking gun' linking technology and well-being and we didn't find it," Andrew Przybylski, a professor at the Oxford Internet Institute (OII) and one of the paper's authors, [3]declared on Tuesday.

[4]

[5]

Przybylski and co-author Matti Vuorre, previously a postdoctoral researcher at Oxford and now associate professor at Tilburg University, did find an increase in reported negative and positive mental health experiences, but concluded "for the average country, life satisfaction had remained relatively stable." The pair also found that adopting internet technology did not affect life satisfaction "to a meaningful large degree."

Nor could the pair find data indicating the mental health effects of internet adoption predominantly affected younger people, as has [6]often been assumed .

[7]

"We did find some evidence suggesting that internet technology adoption is more negatively associated with young individuals' mental health than older groups," but that evidence was "small in magnitude and … credibly in the null region," the pair wrote.

"Overall, the demography-based differences in the mental-health-internet-adoption associates were smaller than within the mental health trends," the pair's paper also observes.

Then why are we all so miserable?

While Przybylski and Vuorre didn't find a statistically significant connection between global mental health statistics and internet proliferation, they noted a substantial body of evidence missing from their report: data collected by online platforms.

"The data and theory required to address this question at the causal level are absent," they noted, because the juiciest data is controlled by tech operators who don't reveal it for independent researchers.

Przybylski told us that he and Vuorre spoke to "all the major social media platforms and games platforms" and, while they had some success in getting [8]data from Meta , "more needs to be done."

[9]

"It is crucial to study, in more detail and with more transparency from all stakeholders, data on individual adoption of and engagement with internet-based technologies," the pair wrote. "Until these data can be transparently analyzed for the public good, the potential harmful effects of the internet and other digital environments will remain unknown."

[10]Meta's fix for teen online mental health? Hold Apple and Google responsible

[11]Social media may harm kids. US Surgeon General says so

[12]Meta slammed with eight lawsuits claiming social media hurts kids

[13]Social media is too much for most of us to handle

Przybylski told The Register that data from online platforms could give researchers a look at what people are doing online – a critically important measure because "most of what people think they know about the influence of the online world is based on unvalidated self-report measures."

"Negative effects are indeed possible, but we need better data to figure out what is going wrong and have some idea of what kinds of solutions would actually make online experiences better for our health," Przybylski told us.

Przybylski previously [14]told The Financial Times that current initiatives – like banning phones, limiting social media access for young people and [15]suing companies like Meta and Google for their role in perpetuating a youth mental health crisis – is "well-being theater."

In the absence of a definite link between internet use and mental health, Przybylski suggests focusing on practices known to promote health and well-being. "Socializing, getting exercise, and sleep are powerful determinants of health whereas the link between the internet and well-being is tenuous at best," Przybylski told us.

Coincidentally or not, a [16]lack of physical activity , [17]decreasing socialization and [18]less restful sleep have all become increasingly prevalent since the COVID-19 pandemic.

"Focusing on what is known to promote health is a much better use of everyone's time and effort," Przybylski argued. ®

Get our [19]Tech Resources



[1] https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21677026231207791

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZWcZ1O7KbORbeuK5kqgMewAAABc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/news-events/no-smoking-gun-mental-health-harm-from-internet-landmark-oxford-survey/

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZWcZ1O7KbORbeuK5kqgMewAAABc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZWcZ1O7KbORbeuK5kqgMewAAABc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/24/33_states_lawsuit_meta/

[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZWcZ1O7KbORbeuK5kqgMewAAABc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[8] https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.221451

[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZWcZ1O7KbORbeuK5kqgMewAAABc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2023/11/15/metas_teen_safety/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/23/us_surgeon_general_report_warns/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/12/in-brief-ai/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/20/social_overload/

[14] https://www.ft.com/content/e5dcdbf4-a914-4216-b212-ec1b362692e2

[15] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/10/schools_sue_meta_google/

[16] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864969/#:~:text=Insufficient%20physical%20activity%20is%20a,itself%20been%20called%20a%20pandemic.&text=Lockdowns%20have%20reduced%20time%20spent,associated%20with%20risks%20to%20health.

[17] https://news.ku.edu/2022/05/05/person-socialization-down-social-media-isnt-to-blame

[18] https://www.apa.org/monitor/2021/06/news-concerns-sleep#:~:text=Since%20the%20pandemic%20began%2C%20researchers,in%20America%202021%2C%20APA).

[19] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Only qualitative?

M. T. Ness

No difference between occasional users and heavy users? To me it seems they have been asking the wrong questions, and that their conclusions are irrelevant.

Re: Only qualitative?

Mike 137

Furthermore, the definition of "wellbeing" is very loose and the results are based on self-reported responses to quite vague questions.

In order to find out what they're testing for more solidly they'd have to define their terms more rigorously, query all respondents several time at reasonably long intervals and even maybe resort to sources such as medical histories.

wolfetone

I remember in 1998 when Pakistan and India were arguing with each other, there was a real threat of a nuclear war between them. I was about 11 years old at the time, and I remember the fear of thinking I could wake up the next day to a nuclear wasteland, or just full on be killed in my sleep. Even before then we had Black Wednesday when I was even younger, and all I understood from it was a load of money was lost and people were losing jobs. Were we going to be poor? Were we going to be homeless?

There was no internet in the house for me to see this or know about it. There was no Instagram, Faceache, YouTube and the like. All there we had was the 6 o'clock news and the newspaper.

Call a spade a spade here, the method of media consumption isn't the problem. It's the media that's making everything so fucking miserable and scary.

Oh, and by the way ...

Mike 137

" "We looked very hard for a 'smoking gun' "

Looking for a smoking gun is the wrong way to conduct objectve science, and any 'science' that's not objective is not really science at all. The legitimate approach should be on the lines of "we set out to find whether there is a correlation between ..."

Socialising, sleep and exercise

RobLang

Time and again they find out that socialising, sleep and exercise are the core three benefits to well-being. Over and over they find those three things and yet they're still looking. Does radio impact it? No, only socialising, sleep and exercise. Does TV impact it? No, only socialising, sleep and exercise. Does the internet impact it? No, only socialising, sleep and exercise.

Perhaps I could pick something random and be paid £40k... what about... Cliff Richard? Does Cliff Richard negatively impact well-being? Then find out that... wait a minute... I've found that Cliff Richard doesn't impact it, only socialising, sleep and exercise do.

It should be easier than this: "Is thing X on the list socialising, sleep and exercise? No? Then it has minimal impact on well-being"

Moaners moan

Pete 2

> Then why are we all so miserable?

It is said that the internet has not made people stupider, it has just made the stupid people more apparent.

Maybe the same is true for the miseries? Before the internet they would just whinge and moan to their friends and family. Now they can whine on to millions. Not only that but they attract and encourage others to do the same. There seems to be a sort of complaining one-upmanship where one person moans that they had to wait 20 minutes at the Post Orifice, then the next one says "that's nothing, I had to wait 30 minutes, in the rain" and so on.

However, as [1]Monty Python reminds us, this phenomenon is not new.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ue7wM0QC5LE

Heaven and Earth are impartial;
They see the ten thousand things as straw dogs.
The wise are impartial;
They see the people as straw dogs.
The space between heaven and Earth is like a bellows.
The shape changes but not the form;
The more it moves, the more it yields.
More words count less.
Hold fast to the center.