UK convinces nations to sign Bletchley Declaration in bid for AI safety
- Reference: 1698847213
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2023/11/01/uk_ai_summit/
- Source link:
"I'm completely confident in telling you the UK is doing far more than other countries to keep you safe," said Sunak, perhaps in an attempt to fan the dying embers of his unpopular government.
It fell to the newly formed Department of Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) to fill in the blanks. Hosting the US, France, Singapore, Italy, Japan, and China at Bletchley Park, birthplace of the UK's World War II Colossus machine, which was co-designed by computer pioneer Alan Turing, the department aimed to create a small group comprised of AI companies, civil societies, and independent experts "to kickstart urgent talks on the risks and opportunities posed by rapid advances in frontier AI – especially ahead of new models launching next year, whose capabilities may not be fully understood."
[1]
The two-day summit will focus on understanding the risks, such as potential threats to national security, right through to the dangers that losing control of the technology could bring.
[2]
[3]
Michelle Donelan, Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, is hosting talks to identify "risks, opportunities and the need for international collaboration, before highlighting consensus on the scale, importance and urgency for AI opportunities and the necessity for mitigating frontier AI risks to unlock them."
"AI is already an extraordinary force for good in our society, with limitless opportunity to grow the global economy, deliver better public services and tackle some of the world's biggest challenges," she said. "But the risks posed by frontier AI are serious and substantive and it is critical that we work together, both across sectors and countries, to recognize these risks."
[4]Yeah, that oughta do the trick, Joe... Biden hopes to tackle AI safety with exec order
[5]Just one in ten UK orgs have significant AI investment plan
[6]AI luminaries call for urgent regulation to head off future threats, but Meta's brainbox boss disagrees
[7]AI safety guardrails easily thwarted, security study finds
Twenty-eight countries and the EU signed up to a so-called Bletchley Declaration, which set an agenda for addressing AI risk. Included was a desire to identify AI safety risks of shared concern and build a "shared scientific and evidence-based understanding of these risks."
Also among the joint ambitions were "building respective risk-based policies across our countries to ensure safety in light of such risks, collaborating as appropriate while recognising our approaches may differ based on national circumstances and applicable legal frameworks."
[8]
"In furtherance of this agenda, we resolve to support an internationally inclusive network of scientific research on frontier AI safety that encompasses and complements existing and new multilateral, plurilateral and bilateral collaboration, including through existing international fora and other relevant initiatives, to facilitate the provision of the best science available for policy making and the public good," the declaration states.
Observers might note that the declaration's contents hardly amount to concrete, practical commitments, while the UK's ambition to eke out international relevance as an AI governance go-between must confront the fact that the United States, the Group of Seven industrialized nations, and the European Union all have their own plans, and something of a head start.
The ministerial hosts tried to inject some tech industry razzle-dazzle into the proceedings with the presence of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and popular podcast guest Elon Musk. Sunak is set to interview the rocket man to get the views of an electric car salesman who paid $44 billion for a social media platform [9]now worth $19 billion . Musk also co-founded OpenAI and new company X.AI. ®
Get our [10]Tech Resources
[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZUKEN@jkqqBCo6XHvIDaXAAAAME&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZUKEN@jkqqBCo6XHvIDaXAAAAME&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZUKEN@jkqqBCo6XHvIDaXAAAAME&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/30/us_president_to_sign_new/
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/30/just_one_in_ten_uk/
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/24/ai_safety_regulation_open_letter/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/12/chatbot_defenses_dissolve/
[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZUKEN@jkqqBCo6XHvIDaXAAAAME&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/31/x_worth_19b/
[10] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Turing had nothing to do with Colossus!
I believe he made a few minor suggestions that also helped but he definitely didn't co-design it.
Even with the Bombe Turing's theoretical version required Gordon Welchman's Diagonal Board to make it viable in practice.
I had to point out to someone earlier today that there were a lot of people at BP (Flowers and Welchman included) whose contribution to our code breaking efforts was at least equal to, if not greater than, Turing's.
Reverse Midas
Anything Sunak touches turns into
It's particularly funny that they chose to use the mob style of talk:
We just want to keep you safe, it would be shame if something happened to you
Twenty-eight countries and the EU signed up to a so-called Bletchley Declaration, which set an agenda for addressing AI risk. Included was a desire to identify AI safety risks of shared concern and build a "shared scientific and evidence-based understanding of these risks."
Translation: They are looking for ways to create regulatory capture so that big corporations, owned by donors, lobbyists and other miscreants can have the AI pie to themselves, maximising their profit.
Re: Reverse Midas
We could soon be as safe as North Korea, where there is 0% crime and everyone is happy all the time.
...identify AI safety risks and build a shared understanding
So no binding agreements not to do bad stuff then.
Woopiedoo.
Pure virtue signalling that Something Is Being Done.
When it really isn't.
Re: ...identify AI safety risks and build a shared understanding
They have likely set up points of contact, so that interested businesses now probably know who they should grease to get favourable legislation to keep competition at bay.
What?
AI is already an extraordinary force for good in our society, with limitless opportunity to grow the global economy, deliver better public services and tackle some of the world's biggest challenges
When did this happen? Are they getting high on their own supply?
Re: What?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/10/28/rishi-sunak-launch-ai-chatbot-pay-taxes-access-pensions/
Given that Sunak is on the way out he is probably using his position to promote this garbage. After all, his wife's company has something in the works:
https://www.infosys.com/services/incubating-emerging-technologies/offerings/nia-chatbot.html
Re: What?
"limitless opportunity to grow the global economy"
Why stop there? Why not go full Iain M. Banks Culture and grow the Universal economy? We could be living forever in utopia before the next election. Right?
It's simple really.
All they have to do is create a sandbox of the universe, down the the quantum level and create the AI within that sandbox (but don't tell it).
Problem solved, you can just switch it off if it gets too leery. Also, you could run multiple of these and speed them up to see which outcomes are likely.
I know what you are going to say, "that's a really stupid idea" right?
Well, it's only as stupid as
""In furtherance of this agenda, we resolve to support an internationally inclusive network of scientific research on frontier AI safety that encompasses and complements existing and new multilateral, plurilateral and bilateral collaboration, including through existing international fora and other relevant initiatives, to facilitate the provision of the best science available for policy making and the public good," the declaration states."
A word-salad which looks like it's been written by ChatGPT. Wouldn't that be ironic?
Re: It's simple really.
and create the AI within that sandbox (but don't tell it).
Wouldn't AI have created itself?
Re: It's simple really.
The only problem is [1]it's simulations all the way down .
[1] https://qntm.org/responsibility
Re: It's simple really.
That's a good read.
And it's totally crazy that someone from 2007 invented a time machine, went to the future, and copied my idea from 2023!
Re: It's simple really.
I think I mean Leary. Or Unruly. Or something. Not Leery anyway.
"I'm completely confident the UK is doing far more than other countries to keep you safe"
So really, all those people here from foreign countries should just learn to stop being so irresponsible and listen to all my brilliant vague bullshit. I'll be interviewing Elon tomorrow about the safety stuff. He can tell us how he made the world a safer place by turning Twitter into a sewer of propaganda, hate and misinformation.
Re: "I'm completely confident the UK is doing far more than other countries to keep you safe"
I guess he needs some new snakeoil to sell because [1]the wheels are coming off existing his current bandwagons (see Cybertruck stream through Starlink to Twitter).
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuHEbfxjhoY
Turing had nothing to do with Colossus!
Alan Turing’s sole contribution to Colossus was
recommending Tommy Flowers (who actually designed Colossus) as a Suitable
Person to look at the problem. Turing made valuable contributions to the Bombe machines which help break Enigma. By 1943 he was at Hanslope Park working on speech encryption (Delilah).