Blue Origin pulls sheets off cargo lunar lander prototype
- Reference: 1698671646
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2023/10/30/blue_origin_lunar_lander/
- Source link:
Dubbed "Pathfinder," the lander is intended to be a demonstration mission, and future versions will be available to payload customers. Blue Moon Mark 1 (MK1) is meant to remain on the lunar surface and be able to transport up to three metric tons.
Pathfinder is also intended to demonstrate technologies including the BE-7 engine, communications, cryogenic power and propulsion systems, and landing accuracy – to within 100 meters. All of which will be required for the NASA Human Landing System for the Artemis program.
[1]
Blue Moon is certainly substantial, and Blue Origin expects the spacecraft to be lofted into space within the 7-metre fairing of the New Glenn rocket... as it's [2]unlikely to launch on a SpaceX Falcon Heavy any time soon.
[3]
[4]
The MK1 Blue Moon cargo lander demonstrator is a near three-story high vehicle. Blue Origin [5]said : "Our Blue Moon landers are architected for that future day when lunar ice can be used to manufacture LOX and LH2 propellants on the Moon."
The New Glenn rocket has yet to make its first flight, having suffered years of delays and redesigns. At present, managers finally hope to get the vehicle off the pad sometime in 2024. Blue Origin has been conspicuously reticent regarding dates for the first flights of the Blue Moon lander.
[6]ULA's Vulcan Centaur hopes to rocket into Christmas
[7]Bezos' engineers dream of Blue Ring space platform in orbit by 2025
[8]Falcon Heavy sends NASA probe to metal-rich asteroid Psyche
[9]Two Project Kuiper prototype satellites finally reach orbit
The MK2 lander is scheduled for an uncrewed demonstration as part of the Artemis 5 mission in or around 2029. The initial human landings are expected to be conducted using SpaceX's Starship, which has its own challenges when it comes to meeting the 2025 target for the first crewed lunar landing in more than 50 years on the Artemis 3 mission.
While SpaceX and Blue Origin have been getting on with their respective rockets and landers, researchers from the University of Central Florida have [10]tested an instrument designed to measure the size and speed of particles kicked up by exhaust from a rocket engine during Lunar or Martian landings.
[11]
Supported by NASA's Flight Opportunities program, the instrument was tested during tethered flights of Astrobotic's Xodiac rocket-powered lander. The data collected has allowed researchers to create models of what will likely get kicked up during a landing. This is essential information for planning a landing since there is every chance that ejecta might damage the lander.
In the days of Apollo, extreme caution was taken due to similar concerns over debris. As it was, the program highlighted other dangers of landing on the Moon. Apollo 15 [12]ended up in a tilt of 11 degrees from the horizontal – not far from the maximum lean of the vehicle. ®
Get our [13]Tech Resources
[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZT-hPVtwHNF9Zr2Y-QKKUQAAAdc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[2] https://www.theregister.com/2023/09/04/project_kuiper_amazon_lawsuit/
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZT-hPVtwHNF9Zr2Y-QKKUQAAAdc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZT-hPVtwHNF9Zr2Y-QKKUQAAAdc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://www.instagram.com/p/Cy595kfOooC/
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/25/ula_vulcan_centaur_christmas/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/17/blue_origin_ring_station/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/17/falcon_heavy_sends_nasa_probe/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/09/project_kuiper_finally_reaches_orbit/
[10] https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/stmd/nasa-supports-tests-of-dust-sensor-to-aid-lunar-landings/
[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZT-hPVtwHNF9Zr2Y-QKKUQAAAdc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[12] https://history.nasa.gov/SP-4029/Apollo_18-27_LM_Lunar_Landing.htm
[13] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
BO Curve?
We just call them sweat stains.
Strategy
Clearly Bezos is not thinking straight.
What he should have done:
- Create barely working prototype of the lunar lander
- List it on Amazon marketplace
- Make it the most popular item in lunar lander category
- Sell the prototypes to Chinese customers
- Wait for lunar lander clones to appear in few months' time at fraction of the price
- Buy clone lunar landers, that probably are going to work unlike the original
Re: Strategy
The normal Amazon method is to let someone else create the product, then if it sells well (they have all the sales data, and know everything else about the customer's buying habits), copy it and sell it for just less than the original vendor, through one of their 'in house brands' (front companies?), whilst also charging the original vendor more and more and de-listing them in searches.
Both Amazon, and the original vendor were already using Chinese manufacturing.
Wondering what it looks like?
the link is "said" !!!!!!
Nicely hidden, Reg.
Re: Wondering what it looks like?
Yeah, but some of us were so aghast at "Our Blue Moon landers are architected for that future day blah blah" that we'd spluttered tea into our keyboards and started to write a letter of protest.
I wonder how the engineers who actually designed the lander feel, having been demeaned to mere architects?
"Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin has unveiled a mockup of the cargo version of its Blue Moon lunar lander ahead of a crewed version intended for NASA's Artemis program"
^ That just isn't good enough. What they should be doing by now is delivering actual test prototypes. For example, the much hyped New Glenn heavy-lift orbital launch vehicle still has yet to make its first flight.
If many of these landers stay on the lunar surface or leave parts behind like the Apollo ones, NASA might need to think about sending a bulldozer to the Moon to start pushing the junk into a large crater.
Blue Origin is way ahead of you with an innovative folding clamshell design to seal in the junk. It's named, you guessed it, Blue Oyster.
Everything works on the drawing board
> Dubbed "Pathfinder
Hoping to piggyback on the TV series [1]For all mankind and hoping it's success will rub off on this venture.
Bezos' history on delivering projects to orbit fills nobody with hope. But presumably as long as this project sees enough NASA bungs, it will have achieved its objective.
[1] https://for-all-mankind.fandom.com/wiki/Pathfinder_(Shuttle)#:~:text=In%201989%2C%20all%20Pathfinder%20shuttles,fleet%20was%20in%20use%20again
umm
Architected? does that mean designed for a future purpose?
Never happen
SpaceX are way ahead of the BO curve