Musk's mighty missile is ready for launch once FAA says OK
(2023/09/07)
- Reference: 1694097130
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2023/09/07/musks_mighty_missile_is_ready/
- Source link:
SpaceX supremo Elon Musk has declared that the next fully stacked Starship is primed for blast off. Sadly, the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) doesn't see things in quite the same way.
Musk [1]trumpeted : "Starship is ready to launch, awaiting FAA license approval" on his mouthpiece, X - [2]formerly known as Twitter . That approval, however, has yet to appear despite the stacking of rocket hardware at SpaceX's South Texas Starbase.
There is no indication when stacking will turn to launching - and hopefully (from Musk's perspective) it won't include exploding this time.
[3]
The hold-up is that regulatory approval. Many things went wrong during the first launch attempt, and the FAA expects SpaceX to implement corrective actions to its satisfaction.
[4]
[5]
An FAA spokesperson told The Register : "The SpaceX Starship mishap investigation remains open. The FAA will not authorize another Starship launch until SpaceX implements the corrective actions identified during the mishap investigation and demonstrates compliance with all the regulatory requirements of the license modification process."
As a reminder, the first launch attempt in April could charitably be described as [6]eventful . A lack of a sound suppression system led to the rocket nearly demolishing its launch pad and damaging surrounding launch infrastructure - debris was sprayed over a distance measured in miles.
[7]
The rocket went into a tumble shortly after launch, with an agonising wait before it was destroyed. The launch also sparked a ground fire in a habitat that is home to endangered wildlife.
SpaceX has since built and tested a water deluge system beneath the launchpad. It has also changed how the rocket's first and second stages will separate during launch.
[8]NASA to outdo most Americans on internet speeds, gigabit kit heading to the ISS
[9]Boffins reckon Mars colony could survive with fewer than two dozen people
[10]Boeing abandons plans for crewed Starliner flight in 2023
[11]NASA still serious about astronauts living it up on Moon space station in 2028
[12]Rocket Lab wants to dry off and reuse Electron booster recovered from the ocean
Unsurprisingly, environmental groups were distinctly unimpressed with the company's antics and a [13]sueball [PDF] was recently launched by a group including the Center for Biological Diversity questioning the decision-making process of the FAA in granting SpaceX a license to launch in the first place.
Despite Musk's confidence, the FAA has remained tightlipped on when and if it will give the billionaire the nod for a second attempt at launching Starship into space. From SpaceX's point of view, the hardware is ready to go. Two hot fires were largely successful, and the upgraded pad infrastructure has been tested.
A lot is riding on a Starship launch. NASA needs the vehicle as part of its Artemis program to return astronauts to the Moon, and Musk has made no secret of his desire to colonise Mars. In the immediate term, it is also needed to continue building out the Starlink satellite constellation. ®
Get our [14]Tech Resources
[1] https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1699233677979390280
[2] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/24/twitter_brand/
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZPnzotYGgcmfJPiZb-al5wAAAxA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZPnzotYGgcmfJPiZb-al5wAAAxA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZPnzotYGgcmfJPiZb-al5wAAAxA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2023/04/26/us_faa_starship/
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZPnzotYGgcmfJPiZb-al5wAAAxA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/29/nasa_iss_broadband/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/16/mars_colony_size/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/08/boeing_abandons_plans_for_crewed/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/22/nasa_moon_space_station/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/19/rocket_lab_electron_recovery/
[13] https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/biodiversity/pdfs/SpaceXComplaintasFiled.pdf
[14] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Musk [1]trumpeted : "Starship is ready to launch, awaiting FAA license approval" on his mouthpiece, X - [2]formerly known as Twitter . That approval, however, has yet to appear despite the stacking of rocket hardware at SpaceX's South Texas Starbase.
There is no indication when stacking will turn to launching - and hopefully (from Musk's perspective) it won't include exploding this time.
[3]
The hold-up is that regulatory approval. Many things went wrong during the first launch attempt, and the FAA expects SpaceX to implement corrective actions to its satisfaction.
[4]
[5]
An FAA spokesperson told The Register : "The SpaceX Starship mishap investigation remains open. The FAA will not authorize another Starship launch until SpaceX implements the corrective actions identified during the mishap investigation and demonstrates compliance with all the regulatory requirements of the license modification process."
As a reminder, the first launch attempt in April could charitably be described as [6]eventful . A lack of a sound suppression system led to the rocket nearly demolishing its launch pad and damaging surrounding launch infrastructure - debris was sprayed over a distance measured in miles.
[7]
The rocket went into a tumble shortly after launch, with an agonising wait before it was destroyed. The launch also sparked a ground fire in a habitat that is home to endangered wildlife.
SpaceX has since built and tested a water deluge system beneath the launchpad. It has also changed how the rocket's first and second stages will separate during launch.
[8]NASA to outdo most Americans on internet speeds, gigabit kit heading to the ISS
[9]Boffins reckon Mars colony could survive with fewer than two dozen people
[10]Boeing abandons plans for crewed Starliner flight in 2023
[11]NASA still serious about astronauts living it up on Moon space station in 2028
[12]Rocket Lab wants to dry off and reuse Electron booster recovered from the ocean
Unsurprisingly, environmental groups were distinctly unimpressed with the company's antics and a [13]sueball [PDF] was recently launched by a group including the Center for Biological Diversity questioning the decision-making process of the FAA in granting SpaceX a license to launch in the first place.
Despite Musk's confidence, the FAA has remained tightlipped on when and if it will give the billionaire the nod for a second attempt at launching Starship into space. From SpaceX's point of view, the hardware is ready to go. Two hot fires were largely successful, and the upgraded pad infrastructure has been tested.
A lot is riding on a Starship launch. NASA needs the vehicle as part of its Artemis program to return astronauts to the Moon, and Musk has made no secret of his desire to colonise Mars. In the immediate term, it is also needed to continue building out the Starlink satellite constellation. ®
Get our [14]Tech Resources
[1] https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1699233677979390280
[2] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/24/twitter_brand/
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZPnzotYGgcmfJPiZb-al5wAAAxA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZPnzotYGgcmfJPiZb-al5wAAAxA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZPnzotYGgcmfJPiZb-al5wAAAxA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2023/04/26/us_faa_starship/
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZPnzotYGgcmfJPiZb-al5wAAAxA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/29/nasa_iss_broadband/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/16/mars_colony_size/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/08/boeing_abandons_plans_for_crewed/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/22/nasa_moon_space_station/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/19/rocket_lab_electron_recovery/
[13] https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/biodiversity/pdfs/SpaceXComplaintasFiled.pdf
[14] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Cost
Flocke Kroes
Not just money. SLS+Orion takes a bunch of ride share cubesats to a distant orbit. Small solar panels and a small antenna far away require a big antenna on Earth. NASA's Deep Space Network is already oversubscribed, under funded and long overdue for maintenance and upgrades. A bunch of cheap cubesats added to make SLS look useful take DSN time away from more productive spacecraft like JWST.
Will Twitler Be A Passenger?
aerogems
If Twitler's not going to be a passenger, and the rocket isn't bound on some one-way trip to the moon or Mars or a galaxy far, far away... what's the point? Well, except for SpaceX to be the butt (pun very much intended) of some rather amusing jokes by the Harley Quinn writers.
https://youtu.be/ArDy1Cuq1gw?feature=shared
Cost
The marginal cost of building another ship / booster is about 3 orders of magnitude less than an SLS. The development cost will also be spread out over thousands of launches vs maybe 8 total for SLS. Hell current billion dollar launch tower will only be used twice for SLS before being scrapped because they need a new billion dollar one after switching to a taller second stage.