Germany's wild boars still too radioactive to eat largely due to Cold War nuke tests
- Reference: 1693466832
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2023/08/31/radioactive_wild_boars_germany/
- Source link:
High levels of the radioactive isotope cesium-137 – or caesium-137 for those outside the US – found inside most animal species living in Bavarian forests have declined over time, except for wild swine. Scientists haven't been able to explain this so-called "wild boar paradox," though a team of researchers led by those at the Leibniz University Hannover may be one step closer to figuring out why.
They analyzed 48 wild boar meat samples to potentially pinpoint the source of the contamination. In 88 percent of the samples, the level of radiation from cesium-137 exceeded Germany's food safety limits of 600 Bq/kg. It's believed this radiocesium got into the boars' diet via truffles, which they root out from underground. The cesium-137 sinks down, is absorbed by the fungus, and then gobbled up by the pigs.
Nuclear weapons fallout contributes significantly to the notorious contamination levels in wild boars in central Europe
The radioactive cesium likely came from two possible sources: the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear reactor disaster, and nuclear weapons testing during that century. To check for this, and using a mass spectrometer, the university team calculated the ratio of cesium-135 to cesium-137 in the wild boar, and found the ratio high enough to suggest that, as the scientists put it, "nuclear weapons fallout contributes significantly to the notorious contamination levels in wild boars in central Europe that were previously believed to be dominated by Chernobyl."
A high ratio of cesium-135 to cesium-137 is a telltale sign that the isotopes came from nuclear weapons rather than nuclear reactors. Radioactive cesium-135 is created when xenon-135, a product of the nuclear fission of uranium, decays without absorbing a neutron. In nuclear reactors, the level of xenon-135 is controlled and converted to its stable form of xenon-136 through neutron absorption. In the case of nuclear weapons, however, xenon-135 is left to proliferate, and it leads to higher levels of radioactive cesium-135.
[1]
Since cesium-135 has a longer half-life than cesium-137 – also a product of uranium and plutonium fission – a higher ratio indicates that the source of radioactivity is more likely to come from nuclear weapons than nuclear reactors. It seems to us that the scientists are arguing that the cesium-135-to-cesium-137 ratio is high, and the level of cesium-137 is already known to be high, so that points to nuclear weapons tests as a significant source of the contamination.
[2]
[3]
That appears to be the logic, anyway.
"It is the nuclear history that is different," Georg Steinhauser, co-author of a paper about this work [4]published in the American Chemical Society's Environmental Science & Technology journal, told The Register . "Nuclear explosions produce more cesium-135 than nuclear reactors."
[5]
"[Xenon-135] has a large cross-section for thermal neutron capture, resulting in suppressed onset of [cesium-135] under the high neutron flux density of a reactor core," the team explained in their paper.
"By contrast, despite the intense but short neutron flux at the moment of a nuclear explosion, [xenon-135] mostly 'survives' the explosion because most [of its] primary fission products [telerrium-135] and [iodine-13] have yet to decay to [xenon-135]. A nuclear explosion hence yields a relatively high [cesium-135 to cesium-137] ratio, whereas a reactor yields a low ratio."
[6]Hacktivists attack Japanese government over Fukushima wastewater release
[7]Alien rock causes cosmic disturbance in New Jersey home
[8]This US national lab turned to AI to hunt rogue nukes
[9]Miniature nuclear reactors could be the answer to sustainable datacenter growth
The researchers calculated that between 10 and 68 percent of the cesium contamination in the wild boar samples are from nuclear weapons testing. "Although Chernobyl has been widely believed to be the prime source of [cesium-137] in wild boars, we find that 'old' [cesium-137] from weapons fallout significantly contributes to the total level in those specimens that exceeded the regulatory limit," they wrote.
Now, the team is warning against the detrimental long lasting effects of nuclear weapons and nuclear reactor disasters on food safety. Countries like the US, Soviet Union, and UK conducted thousands of nuclear weapons tests during the Cold War from the 1940s to 1990s.
"An important takeaway is that the long-forgotten atmospheric nuclear weapons tests and their fallout still cast a shadow on the environment," Steinhauser told us.
[10]
"Just because they took place 60 years ago doesn't mean that they no longer impact the ecosystem. Monitoring of wild boars will remain necessary (then there is no problem eating them). We must take good care of our planet and avoid any further releases. These may create a snowball effect." ®
Get our [11]Tech Resources
[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZPBkwn@MRFec0upYotUEJAAAARc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZPBkwn@MRFec0upYotUEJAAAARc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZPBkwn@MRFec0upYotUEJAAAARc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.est.3c03565
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZPBkwn@MRFec0upYotUEJAAAARc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/14/hactivitsts_claim_japanese_government_attack/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/11/new_jersey_meteorite/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/30/us_ai_nuclear_hunter/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/12/30/smr_nuclear_datacenter/
[10] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZPBkwn@MRFec0upYotUEJAAAARc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[11] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
This is actually a devious plan .....
..... by the boar to ensure that they stay off the menu!
Being tasty to eat and healthy is not a good survival plan in this modern age!
Re: This is actually a devious plan .....
That explains americans.
Re: This is actually a devious plan .....
Depends on whether you're also capable of breeding in captivity. Then it becomes a pretty good plan. Pigs and sheep and cows and chickens outnumber pretty much anything in their categories.
Care?
We must take good care of our planet...
Wishful thinking. We've been doing such a good job at "taking good care" that we are in a new geological era because of our meddling.
Re: Care?
Only a very small number of geologists believe we are in a new era. Just saying something doesn't make it true.
Re: Care?
Geologists define geological periods. If they define us as being within a new period than, by definition, we are. It may, in your eyes, be an arbitrary definition but that's the nature of geology. On the one hand changes are unusually gradual but they are none the less real and it's not feasible to understand the Earth's history without dividing it into phases of some sort. Given that we have become a major influence on the processes that happen on the Earth's surface it would be foolish not to recognise a new phase.
Re: Care?
Geologists define geological periods. If they define us as being within a new period than, by definition, we are.
Sure, but that would mean consensus, not a headline-grabbing fringe.
Question
In nuclear reactors, the level of xenon-135 is controlled and converted to its stable form of xenon-136 through neutron absorption
This is for a nuclear reactor that doesn't have a big hole in the top of it, right?
Re: Question
It would be the situation in a nuclear reactor before it had a big hole in the top. What came out of the big hole would have been what was produced before the big hole was made.
Re: Question
I would have thought that too. The most accepted theory as to the chernobyl explosion is that xenon poisoning caused the power drop which made them remove too many control rods.
So it wasn't because he fell into the potion as a baby after all?
nah, just another plan to stop Obelix and friends visiting the original Goths
Ahhhh Chernobyl 1986
I spent 2 months camping across Scandinavia under some odd Ukrainian generated clouds.
My Dad was involved in the British H bomb tests in the 50s.
We’re both well, thank you.
Meanwhile, in Japan...
There's an apparently similar phenomenon in Japan where there are radioactive wild boar as a result of the Fukushima incident.
However, in [1]a study , there was a huge difference in radiation levels between animals found around the power plant (on average 470 Bq/kg) and those taken from a control region roughly 600km away (1.5 Bq/kg).
You might imagine that if a substantial part of the excess radiation in pigs came from atmospheric weapons fallout and not from more local events that it might be more widely distributed. What could account for it being concentrated in Bavaria?
[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636247/
Re: Meanwhile, in Japan...
It might be just be that this was observed in Bavaria, because of this study. I think the next step would for this to be measured and studied in Austria, Czechia etc.
I live in Czechia, I like boar meat, it's relatively popular and available. I would like to know just how radioactive it is... not that it's guaranteed to stop me ;)
This should really spur more research. One local effect I could think of would be uranium mining, back in the 50s nobody really cared about safety too much. However, as far as I know that wouldn't really produce cesium isotopes, which are more often the results of fission, rather than decay. I don't know more than high school physics about this though.
Re: Meanwhile, in Japan...
The radioactive hybrid terror pigs!
"Radioactive hybrid terror pigs have made themselves a home in Fukushima's exclusion zone"
https://www.theregister.com/2021/07/01/radioactive_hybrid_terror_pigs_fukushima/
Ah, the good 'ol days.
Things are so bad...
...in the Berlin area that the boars started mutating into lions.