US task force to look into how military could use generative AI
- Reference: 1692190746
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2023/08/16/the_us_pentagon_launches_new/
- Source link:
The task force was organized by the Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks and will be led by the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office. It will analyze different tools like large language models and figure out how to integrate them into the military's software systems.
"The establishment of Task Force Lima underlines the Department of Defense's unwavering commitment to leading the charge in AI innovation," Hicks [1]said in a statement.
[2]
"As we navigate the transformative power of generative AI, our focus remains steadfast on ensuring national security, minimizing risks, and responsibly integrating these technologies. The future of defense is not just about adopting cutting-edge technologies, but doing so with foresight, responsibility, and a deep understanding of the broader implications for our nation," she added.
[3]
[4]
The US government is stepping up its efforts to regulate AI, and has [5]urged leading companies to develop safeguards against the technology being misused to create biological weapons or malware.
[6]Fear not, White House chatted to OpenAI and pals, and they promised to make AI safe
[7]Sarah Silverman, novelists sue OpenAI for scraping their books to train ChatGPT
[8]Department of Homeland Security bets on AI to help handle China
Craig Martell, the DoD's Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer and former head of machine learning at self-driving biz Lyft, said the US must examine and adopt AI despite the risks.
"The DoD has an imperative to responsibly pursue the adoption of generative AI models while identifying proper protective measures and mitigating national security risks that may result from issues such as poorly managed training data," he said. "We must also consider the extent to which our adversaries will employ this technology and seek to disrupt our own use of AI-based solutions."
CDAO is particularly interested in applying generative AI models to create new tools that can enhance the military's warfighting and decision-making abilities, and improve other areas like health and policy too.
'Slow AI' needed to stop autonomous weapons making humans worse [9]READ MORE
"The adoption of artificial intelligence in defense is not solely about innovative technology but also about enhancing national security," said US Navy Captain M. Xavier Lugo, who is also mission commander of Task Force Lima and a member of the CDAO's Algorithmic Warfare Directorate. "The DoD recognizes the potential of generative AI to significantly improve intelligence, operational planning, and administrative and business processes. However, responsible implementation is key to managing associated risks effectively."
In July, it was [10]reported that the Pentagon has begun testing five different large language models' abilities to solve tasks like generating strategic plans.
[11]
The commercial models were given access to military documents and asked to create plans to solve hypothetical scenarios, like a global crisis. Current tools may not end up being much use to the military, however, considering their tendency to generate false, misleading information that cannot be trusted, especially in high-risk situations like combat or intelligence. ®
Get our [12]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3489803/dod-announces-establishment-of-generative-ai-task-force/
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZNzyqVIkuHbgIaGndRN3bAAAANA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZNzyqVIkuHbgIaGndRN3bAAAANA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZNzyqVIkuHbgIaGndRN3bAAAANA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/21/white_house_ai_rules/
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/21/white_house_ai_rules/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/10/in_brief_ai/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2023/04/24/us_homeland_security_ai_taskforce/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2023/04/04/slow_ai_autonomous_weapons/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/10/in_brief_ai/
[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZNzyqVIkuHbgIaGndRN3bAAAANA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[12] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
God Help Us All
"Current tools may not end up being much use to the military, however, considering their tendency to generate false, misleading information that cannot be trusted"
If the folks quoted in the article are any sample of the thought processes of whoever is in charge, false and misleading might be an improvement. If "they" are actually thinking of using generative AI in strategic planning, I think our optimum strategy might be to seek out an enemy and surrender. In the long run, it'll likely save a lot of grief and money.
"solve tasks like generating strategic plans"
Ooh, I'm sure the generals are thrilled about that. And I'm sure the generative statistics bullshit generator is going to have no problem in taking into account prior encounters, experience it doesn't have in dealing with that target population, and a whole other set of information that nobody is going to input into the system because nobody working on the system has the data and, even if they did, they wouldn't have a clue as to how to input it.
Let's go ahead and set that up, then generate a strategic plan for beating Imperial Japan at the end of WWII. I'd like to see that generative "AI" pitted against the strategic thinking of the time, and then that of today.
As a beta run, if you will.
If it fails, back to the drawing board.
But who am I kidding ? It's a military, pie-in-the-sky plan. First they pay for it, then they implement it, then the soldiers pay for it, then they scrap it.
Military grade AI
Parrot 1 : Kwaertiiie
Parrot 2 : Whhaetie?
Parrot 1 : Bleahsjoom
Parrot 2 : Readying Thermonuclear Load
Parrot 2 : Fshire ally cannonieee
See icon, I guess.