News: 1691562494

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

TSMC and pals chip in for €10B German fab

(2023/08/09)


What does €5 billion of German taxpayer funding buy you? Certainly not domestic production of TSMC's leading-edge process tech.

For TSMC's foray into European manufacturing, the foundry operator is sticking with mature process tech, namely its 28/22nm planar CMOS and 16nm/12nm FinFET nodes. The joint venture between TSMC, NXP, Infineon, and Bosch, [1]announced on Tuesday, will see the construction of a 300mm-wafer fab outside Dresden, which will produce 40,000 wafers a month.

This means that by the time the factory begins production in 2027, the facility's most advanced process tech will be nearly a [2]decade old . However, because the facility is expected to focus primarily on chips for the automotive and industrial markets, this isn't necessarily a problem as the bulk of purchases in the sector aren't for bleeding-edge silicon.

[3]

"Europe is a highly promising place for semiconductor innovation, particularly in the automotive and industrial fields, and we look forward to bringing those innovations to life on our advanced silicon technology with the talent in Europe," TSMC CEO CC Wei said in a statement.

[4]

[5]

This jointly owned fab is expected to cost €10 billion (£8.6 billion, $11 billion), roughly a third the cost of Intel's [6]Magdeburg mega fab , which comes with a price tag of over €30 billion. That facility is expected to produce chips based on Intel's angstrom-era process tech when the fab comes online in 2027.

[7]Big chip players join forces to form another RISC-V venture

[8]The semiconductor biz is sick, but demand for SiC chips that improve EVs is accelerating

[9]Germany raids climate piggy bank for €20B to bankroll chip fabs

[10]GlobalFoundries claims German chip subsidies will 'distort competition'

While TSMC will operate the Dresden facility, it will do so under a new entity predictably called the European Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (ESMC). TSMC will retain 70 percent ownership of the company and the fab while NXP, Infineon, and Bosch will each hold a 10 percent share.

While the German government will front the largest chunk of the cost – the aforementioned five billion euros – TSMC has [11]committed to paying €3.5 billion (£3 billion, $3.8 billion) from its own funds. It appears TSMC's partners are on the hook the remaining €1.5 billion (£1.3 billion, $1.6 billion) not covered by the German government.

In an email to The Register on Tuesday Bosch and NXP semiconductor confirmed they would each contribute €500 million (£430 million, $548 million) to the project. We also reached out to Infineon, and had not heard back at the time of writing.

[12]

"The joint venture partners are counting on adequate funding under the framework of the European Chips Act to close the estimated funding gap in accordance with national funding provisions and European State aid rules," a NXP spokesperson told The Register . "No further EU funding details are available at this time."

Berlin has been aggressive in its efforts to attract chipmakers, going so far as to [13]siphon €20 billion (£17 billion, $22 billion) from the country's Climate and Transformation Fund to offset the cost of building fabs.

While Intel was among the first to announce a factory in the country, securing adequate subsidies to offset the extreme cost of building the facilities has been a point of [14]contention with the nation's government. It was only recently that the country reached an agreement with Intel on funding, though the distribution of funds hasn't gone over that well for everyone, with GlobalFoundries [15]expressing frustration that Intel and TSMC will walk away with the bulk of the cash.

[16]

Late last month, GlobalFoundries criticized German officials, claiming the subsidies would distort competition.

"There is a real risk of dependence on a single supplier, market foreclosure and less resilient supply chains as a consequence," the US biz's CEO Tom Caulfield was quoted as saying. ®

Get our [17]Tech Resources



[1] https://pr.tsmc.com/english/news/3049

[2] https://www.tsmc.com/english/dedicatedFoundry/technology/logic/l_16_12nm

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZNNjxKjwH@vj9SQDbkNMtQAAAdA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZNNjxKjwH@vj9SQDbkNMtQAAAdA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZNNjxKjwH@vj9SQDbkNMtQAAAdA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2023/06/19/germany_to_subsidize_intel_10bn/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/04/chip_companies_risc_v/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/01/onsemi_silicon_caribide_demand/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/25/germany_climate_fund/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/25/globalfoundries_german_subsidies/

[11] https://pr.tsmc.com/english/news/3047

[12] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZNNjxKjwH@vj9SQDbkNMtQAAAdA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/25/germany_climate_fund/

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2023/06/13/german_finance_minister_says_nein/

[15] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/25/globalfoundries_german_subsidies/

[16] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZNNjxKjwH@vj9SQDbkNMtQAAAdA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[17] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Anonymous Coward

22nm planar ... isn't that what ST were doing at Crolles about 10 years ago?

Charlie Clark

Probably. These chips don't need to be cutting edge: the car and appliance makers were really hammered by supply chain problems – many of their own making – during and after the pandemic. This is an attempt to mitigate such risks with the subsidies an attempt to make it look competitive.

At least Germany has water

Pascal Monett

Contrary to some fab implementation decisions these past few months.

Still, isn't it nice to be big enough to have countries willing to pay you for putting some money on the table ?

If I were to decide to mount an office for myself in, say, Switzerland, I doubt very much that phoning up the Chamber of Commerce in Bern and asking for a million Swiss Francs would bring me anything but, at best, a hearty chuckle and best wishes.

There has also been some work to allow the interesting use of macro names.
For example, if you wanted all of your "creat()" calls to include read
permissions for everyone, you could say

#define creat(file, mode) creat(file, mode | 0444)

I would recommend against this kind of thing in general, since it
hides the changed semantics of "creat()" in a macro, potentially far away
from its uses.
To allow this use of macros, the preprocessor uses a process that
is worth describing, if for no other reason than that we get to use one of
the more amusing terms introduced into the C lexicon. While a macro is
being expanded, it is temporarily undefined, and any recurrence of the macro
name is "painted blue" -- I kid you not, this is the official terminology
-- so that in future scans of the text the macro will not be expanded
recursively. (I do not know why the color blue was chosen; I'm sure it
was the result of a long debate, spread over several meetings.)
-- From Ken Arnold's "C Advisor" column in Unix Review