IBM to build biometrics system for UK cops and immigration services
(2023/08/02)
- Reference: 1690965014
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2023/08/02/ibm_biometric_deal/
- Source link:
The UK's Home Office has handed IBM a £54.7 million ($70 million) contract to work on the biometric matcher platform to support its police and immigration services in identifying suspects against a database of fingerprint and photo data.
Big Blue's deal is to provide the Matcher Service Platform (MSP), which includes a "service bus" to provide biometric transaction processing logic, biometric workflow rules, integration of matching engine software (MES) and a service interface used by external subsystems”, according to [1]an official notice .
The American tech biz will also create an infrastructure platform to host and provide the computing capacity for these services.
[2]
The contract, which set to run for a five-year term with an option to extend for a further three years, will transition and manage the existing Matcher Platform, built by Fujitsu, as well as creating new search capabilities and the decommissioning of legacy algorithms for a police service biometric data service IDENT1 and the immigration and asylum biometric information system (IABS).
[3]
[4]
In February 2018, Fujitsu won [5]the £28 million contract ($35 million) to provide the Biometric Matcher Platform and associated Services (BMPS), in a deal which was set to end in March 2023.
The Register has contacted the Home Office to ask whether it has extended the Fujitsu contract to allow the handover to IBM.
[6]
Separate services run IDENT1 and IABS. In 2018, Home Office launched plans to move service management of the IDENT1 and IABS systems to a single supplier. IDENT1 had been [7]managed by US defence specialist Northrop Grumman following a relationship first established in 1995. IABS had been overseen by IBM.
In Jan 2018, Home Office [8]had planned to award a deal for £198 million ($253 million) over six years, rising to £308 million ($393 million) if the engagement lasts for the full 10 years, according to a tender notice published at the time.
In 2019, the central government department responsible for policing and securing UK borders awarded the six-year deal to global systems integrator [9]Leidos Innovations for £96.4 million ($123 million). It retained the option of extending the contract for two periods of up to two years each.
[10]UK's proposed alt.GDPR will turn Britain into a 'test lab' for data harvesting
[11]TSA wants to expand facial recognition to hundreds of airports within next decade
[12]UK's GDPR replacement could wipe out oversight of live facial recognition
[13]Facial recog system used by Met Police shows racial bias at low thresholds
The Register has contacted Leidos to ask whether it expects to see its contract extended. It has yet to respond.
The matching programs, IDENT1 and IABS, are managed by Home Office Biometrics (HOB).
[14]
Earlier this year, human rights campaigners at [15]Big Brother Watch said [PDF] the Home Office was in the process of combining IDENT1 and IABS into a "mega-database," with logically separated role-based access controls.
"Although there is little information currently in the public domain about the Home Office's development of facial recognition as part of the HOB, some police forces do see this national system as a viable alternative to procuring their own retrospective facial recognition systems," it said. ®
Get our [16]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/f8eb2c05-0bc2-4575-8d59-3c7056f25e01
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZMopQ9U0D4IbQ-6EyPcligAAA44&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZMopQ9U0D4IbQ-6EyPcligAAA44&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZMopQ9U0D4IbQ-6EyPcligAAA44&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/notice/21319a82-4a57-4b62-8eff-57a320a2328e
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZMopQ9U0D4IbQ-6EyPcligAAA44&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://news.northropgrumman.com/news/releases/united-kingdom-police-information-technology-organization-selects-northrop-grumman-for-identification-services-contract
[8] https://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:007075-2018:TEXT:EN:HTML
[9] https://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:511048-2019:TEXT:EN:HTML
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/06/uk_data_protection_bill/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/03/tsa_facial_recognition_airport/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/19/dpib_2_surveillance_oversight/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/25/facial_recognition_system_used_by/
[14] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZMopQ9U0D4IbQ-6EyPcligAAA44&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[15] https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Biometric-Britain.pdf
[16] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Big Blue's deal is to provide the Matcher Service Platform (MSP), which includes a "service bus" to provide biometric transaction processing logic, biometric workflow rules, integration of matching engine software (MES) and a service interface used by external subsystems”, according to [1]an official notice .
The American tech biz will also create an infrastructure platform to host and provide the computing capacity for these services.
[2]
The contract, which set to run for a five-year term with an option to extend for a further three years, will transition and manage the existing Matcher Platform, built by Fujitsu, as well as creating new search capabilities and the decommissioning of legacy algorithms for a police service biometric data service IDENT1 and the immigration and asylum biometric information system (IABS).
[3]
[4]
In February 2018, Fujitsu won [5]the £28 million contract ($35 million) to provide the Biometric Matcher Platform and associated Services (BMPS), in a deal which was set to end in March 2023.
The Register has contacted the Home Office to ask whether it has extended the Fujitsu contract to allow the handover to IBM.
[6]
Separate services run IDENT1 and IABS. In 2018, Home Office launched plans to move service management of the IDENT1 and IABS systems to a single supplier. IDENT1 had been [7]managed by US defence specialist Northrop Grumman following a relationship first established in 1995. IABS had been overseen by IBM.
In Jan 2018, Home Office [8]had planned to award a deal for £198 million ($253 million) over six years, rising to £308 million ($393 million) if the engagement lasts for the full 10 years, according to a tender notice published at the time.
In 2019, the central government department responsible for policing and securing UK borders awarded the six-year deal to global systems integrator [9]Leidos Innovations for £96.4 million ($123 million). It retained the option of extending the contract for two periods of up to two years each.
[10]UK's proposed alt.GDPR will turn Britain into a 'test lab' for data harvesting
[11]TSA wants to expand facial recognition to hundreds of airports within next decade
[12]UK's GDPR replacement could wipe out oversight of live facial recognition
[13]Facial recog system used by Met Police shows racial bias at low thresholds
The Register has contacted Leidos to ask whether it expects to see its contract extended. It has yet to respond.
The matching programs, IDENT1 and IABS, are managed by Home Office Biometrics (HOB).
[14]
Earlier this year, human rights campaigners at [15]Big Brother Watch said [PDF] the Home Office was in the process of combining IDENT1 and IABS into a "mega-database," with logically separated role-based access controls.
"Although there is little information currently in the public domain about the Home Office's development of facial recognition as part of the HOB, some police forces do see this national system as a viable alternative to procuring their own retrospective facial recognition systems," it said. ®
Get our [16]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/f8eb2c05-0bc2-4575-8d59-3c7056f25e01
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZMopQ9U0D4IbQ-6EyPcligAAA44&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZMopQ9U0D4IbQ-6EyPcligAAA44&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZMopQ9U0D4IbQ-6EyPcligAAA44&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/notice/21319a82-4a57-4b62-8eff-57a320a2328e
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZMopQ9U0D4IbQ-6EyPcligAAA44&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://news.northropgrumman.com/news/releases/united-kingdom-police-information-technology-organization-selects-northrop-grumman-for-identification-services-contract
[8] https://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:007075-2018:TEXT:EN:HTML
[9] https://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:511048-2019:TEXT:EN:HTML
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/06/uk_data_protection_bill/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/03/tsa_facial_recognition_airport/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/19/dpib_2_surveillance_oversight/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/25/facial_recognition_system_used_by/
[14] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZMopQ9U0D4IbQ-6EyPcligAAA44&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[15] https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Biometric-Britain.pdf
[16] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Anonymous Coward
sounds disturbingly similar to contracts IBM landed with a certain regime in the 1930's. I guess they at least had prior art to present for the tender...
WTF?
Anonymous Coward
Where are the similarities other than it's a government contracting a company to do some work for them? This is something that the Home Office want to do. If it were not IBM, it would be someone else. It's not like IBM have a monopoly on the technology. Your comment is just clickbait (damn, I guess it worked).
If there is "Prior Art", it is that IBM used to run IABS, which is much more relevant.
Undoubtedly
" some police forces do see this national system as a viable alternative to procuring their own retrospective facial recognition systems "
Well of course they do. The fact that facial recog has been demonstrated as not efficient enough for actual security does not bother them. What they want is a system that can tell them when to hurl themselves onto someone, cuff him and drag him away for questioning. The fact that there is a non-negligeable chance that said questioning could reveal that the system was wrong and they are guilty of abusing their powers is not a problem - it's all a days' work.
Oh, and it's also interesting to note that none of them are for a minute thinking that not having a facial recog system is an option. No. They're all going to have one, so yes, it figures that a national system is much better.
The Police State is something we are all just easing into without a second thought.
How wonderful ?