News: 1687422612

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Without competition, TCS wins back UK pensions body in £1.5B mega-deal

(2023/06/22)


The UK's National Employment Savings Trust (Nest), an occupational pensions scheme, has inked a £1.5 billion ($1.9 billion) deal with TCS without competition after sacking off French supplier Atos earlier this year.

The new deal says the India IT services giant will the build, deliver and operate administration services for the defined contribution pension scheme, supporting auto-enrolment and be delivered primarily via digital channels.

In February, [1]NEST ended its £1.5 billion ($1.9 billion) deal with French IT services supplier Atos just two years into its potential 18-year term.

[2]

At the time, The Register was told Nest and Atos finished their active program of work, and Nest was continuing to work with its existing partner, TCS, while it reviews its longer-term requirements and plans.

[3]

[4]

That assessment seems to have concluded that no one else in the world could provide the combination of tech and services NEST requires.

In the [5]announcement for the new deal — set to last between 10 and 18 years — NEST said competition is absent “for technical reasons” so it awarded the contract to TCS “without publishing a prior call for competition.”

[6]

The tender documents explained Nest commissioned a market assessment from accountancy and consultancy firm PricewaterhouseCoopers “to understand whether there is competition in the market capable of meeting Nest's requirements for technical experience.”

“PwC's expert conclusion was that, apart from TCS, there was no single supplier or consortium in the market now or the short term (assessed over the next 12 months) who could meet Nest's requirements,” the document said.

As a public body, NEST needs to comply with public procurement regulations, which set out rules for fair and open competition. However, the authority said it was able to use a “negotiated procedure without prior publication” for the contract award because of the absence of competition.

[7]

“Nest concludes there is presently no reasonable alternative or substitute available and the absence of competition is not the result of an artificial narrowing down of the parameters of the procurement,” it said.

Nest noted that its requirements for the service had not changed since it awarded the work to Atos in March 2021 [8]in a contract estimated to be worth £1.5 billion over 18 years . That competition only attracted only two final tender submissions in 2021 “despite extensive market warming efforts,” the latest tender notice reveals.

Nest’s decision to end its relationship with Atos in February came about after the French supplier argued that product delivery deadlines should be extended because the publicly owned investment trust had requested last-minute design changes. Nest refused to renegotiate the delivery timeline and cited terms and conditions in the contract to try to keep the timetable on track, according to details seen by The Register .

In a statement at the time, Gavin Perera-Betts, Nest chief customer officer, said Atos had been “instrumental in helping us transition to becoming a more data-led organization.”

In an email to The Register , John Ainsworth, head of Atos Business Transformation Services, said the company had “helped set strong foundations for the organisation's digital transformation journey. We are working with our teams and partners to manage the transition of the contract."

Nest [9]first signed with TCS in 2010 , in a deal set to last until 2020. It looks like the couple can enjoy many more years together. ®

Get our [10]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/01/atos_and_nest_part_company/

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/paasiaas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZJQbv4o5-qOqWS2IkcU7YQAAABg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/paasiaas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZJQbv4o5-qOqWS2IkcU7YQAAABg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/paasiaas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZJQbv4o5-qOqWS2IkcU7YQAAABg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/017642-2023

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/paasiaas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZJQbv4o5-qOqWS2IkcU7YQAAABg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/paasiaas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZJQbv4o5-qOqWS2IkcU7YQAAABg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2021/03/10/atos_nest_contract/

[9] https://www.nestpensions.org.uk/schemeweb/NestWeb/includes/public/news/NEST-confirms-10-year-administration-contract-with-Tata-Consultancy-Services.html

[10] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Get used to it ...

Andy The Hat

'competition is absent “for technical reasons” '

I can see this phrase being recycled when Palantir inevitably get a contract ... and when Crapita get their next contract ...

Somewhere in the specification it will say 'Company name must resemble "Palantir" ' or 'Demonstrable experience in massively under quoting and late delivery of product required' ...

Hear me out. Linux is Microsoft's main competition right now. Because of
this we are forcing them to "innovate", something they would usually avoid.
Now if MS Bob has taught us anything, Microsoft is not a company that
should be innovating. When they do, they don't come up with things like
"better security" or "stability", they come back with "talking
paperclips", and "throw in every usless feature we can think of, memory
footprint be dammed".

Unfortunatly, they also come up with the bright idea of executing email.
Now MIME attachments aren't enough, they want you to be able to run/open
attachments right when you get them. This sounds like a good idea to
people who believe renaming directories to folders made computing possible
for the common man, but security wise it's like vigorously shaking a
package from the Unibomber.

So my friends, we are to blame. We pushed them into frantically trying to
invent "necessary" features to stay on top, and look where it got us. Many
of us are watching our beloved mail servers go down under the strain and
rebuilding our company's PC because of our pointless competition with MS.
I implore you to please drop Linux before Microsoft innovates again.

-- From a Slashdot.org post in regards to the ILOVEYOU email virus