NASA to tear the wings off plane in the name of sustainability
- Reference: 1686724267
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2023/06/14/nasa_boeing_xplane/
- Source link:
The [1]MD-90 , like the 737s and A320s that dominate the world's commercial airline fleets, is a single-aisle twinjet. NASA thinks planes of that sort can be made more efficient with a "transonic truss-braced wing configuration". It's therefore acquired an old MD-90, and on Tuesday [2]named it the X-66A.
The plane is in for a rough time. NASA plans to shorten the fuselage and attach "long, thin wings with engines mounted underneath and a set of aerodynamic trusses for support."
[3]
Those trusses look something like this:
[4]
NASA's braced wing demonstrator – Click to enlarge
"The X-66A will help shape the future of aviation, a new era where aircraft are greener, cleaner, and quieter, and create new possibilities for the flying public and American industry alike," said NASA administrator Bill Nelson.
"To reach our goal of net-zero aviation emissions by 2050, we need transformative aircraft concepts like the ones we're flying on the X-66A," said Bob Pearce, associate administrator for NASA's aeronautics research mission directorate.
[5]NASA experts looked through 800 UFO sightings and found essentially nothing
[6]Boeing discovers Dreamliner defect, delivery delay decided
[7]Boeing takes flight in sustainability battle with carbon data cruncher
[8]NASA's electric plane tech is coming in for a late, bumpy landing
It's not immediately clear what sort of new engines or fuel the X-66A will employ – though traditional aviation fuel is likely given the modest 30 percent target in emissions reductions.
X-planing history
The [9]X-plane program has been around since the 1940s, when NASA's predecessor – the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics – started its first experimental aircraft program together with the US Air Force and Navy.
The X-plane program brought us the [10]first aircraft to break the sound barrier, the first aircraft with variable wing sweep angle, and plenty of [11]hypersonic flight tests.
[12]
NASA's X-5 experimental aircraft, the first with variable wing sweep – Click to enlarge
Recent X-planes have included the [13]X-59 quiet supersonic aircraft, and the [14]X-48B blended wing.
X-66A joins another sustainability-focused X-plane, the all-electric [15]X-57 "Maxwell" that has gone [16]way over schedule and budget .
[17]
With luck, things at the SFD program will go more smoothly and the X-66A can be "the next in a long line of experimental aircraft used to validate breakthrough designs" in aircraft efficiency and sustainability, said Boeing CTO Todd Citron.
Citron is probably hoping that will be the case, because Boeing is on the hook for most of the funding for the SFD program. While NASA has committed to contributing $425 million over the next seven years, Boeing has committed to around $725 million for the program, NASA said.
[18]
On top of that, Boeing could use a win in its relationship with NASA [19]right about now . ®
Get our [20]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.boeing.com/history/products/md-80-and-md-90-commercial-transport.page
[2] https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/next-generation-experimental-aircraft-becomes-nasa-s-newest-x-plane
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZImPxu2ZntcMMpD@afJVTwAAAEU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[4] https://regmedia.co.uk/2023/06/13/supplied_nasa_braced_wing.jpg
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2023/06/01/nasa_ufo_panel/
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2023/06/07/boeing_787_production_defect/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/18/boeing_sustainability_tool/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/18/nasa_electrified_aircraft_propulsion_audit/
[9] https://www.nasa.gov/centers/armstrong/aircraft/x-planes/index.html
[10] https://www.nasa.gov/centers/armstrong/news/FactSheets/FS-085-DFRC.html
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2022/04/06/darpa_hypersonic_missile/
[12] https://regmedia.co.uk/2023/06/13/nasa-x-5.jpg
[13] https://www.nasa.gov/centers/armstrong/aircraft/x-planes/index.html
[14] https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/research/X-48B/index.html
[15] https://www.nasa.gov/centers/armstrong/programs_projects/electric_propulsion/index.html
[16] https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/18/nasa_electrified_aircraft_propulsion_audit/
[17] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZImPxu2ZntcMMpD@afJVTwAAAEU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[18] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZImPxu2ZntcMMpD@afJVTwAAAEU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[19] https://www.theregister.com/2023/06/02/boeing_starliner_crewed_flight_delay/
[20] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
The not very 'aerodynamic truss' left a lot of turbulence in her wake
Interesting design
That 'support' is of course under tension in flight, transferring some of the lift from the wing to the fuselage. I'd love to see the structure where it's attached. But I wonder where they're going to keep the fuel... isn't most of the wing space fuel tanks on most aircraft? That long thin wing is good for lift and drag but it looks like a rather smaller volume.
Mind you, if the efficiency increase matches the fuel tank size change...
Re: Interesting design
When my cousin said she didn't want to fly because she was scared of the wings falling off the reply from the engineer in the room of "the wings wouldn't fall off the plane, it's the plane that would fall off the wings" didn't ease her mind in the slightest.
Re: Interesting design
less fuel, less weight and less lift so smaller volume wings makes sense. The wing struts will produce lift so it is close to a bi-plane At one extreme it could become a bi-plane glider with maximum lift and little forward velocity, at the other a dart shaped projectile with minimal lift but high speed ... neither would need much fuel while in the air. In fact I saw a documentary once where a runner on the road competed against a elastic-band-powered flyer. Spoiler alert, the road runner won, Wile E Coyote ran out of power and lost ...
Re: Interesting design
I was thinking that myself. The "eye of Horus"-like wing shape looks rather Romulan to me.
Re: Interesting design
There are other places to put fuel, but yes, some fuselage space will need to carry fuel rather than cargo - that's not exactly new.
Not this again
The X-plane program brought us the first aircraft to break the sound barrier... in level flight.
There's still a lot of arguments about who was first past Mach 1 in a dive and it wasn't Chuck.
Somewhat of a kwasi-wing then.