Starlink bags US defense contract to keep war-torn Ukraine connected
- Reference: 1685725386
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2023/06/02/starlink_ukraine_defense_contract/
- Source link:
The news follows confirmation earlier this week of an [1]additional $300 million worth of weapons systems and other aid being sent to the country.
The satellite operator, part of Elon Musk's SpaceX business, started off providing much-needed satellite communications capability to war-torn Ukraine at its own expense, but it has now secured an official Department of Defense (DoD) contract to fund those services.
[2]
According to various [3]sources , an unnamed DoD official said in a statement: "Satellite communications constitute a vital layer in Ukraine's overall communications network and the department contracts with Starlink for services of this type."
[4]
[5]
The spokesperson confirmed the DoD continues to work with "a range of global partners to ensure Ukraine has the resilient satellite and communication capabilities they need," but for operational security reasons and the critical nature of these systems, "we do not have additional information regarding specific capabilities, contracts, or partners to provide at this time."
SpaceX did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
[6]
Starlink started providing Ukraine with terminals and a country-wide service soon after it was hit by the Russian invasion in February 2022. At first, the satellite operator was essentially funding this itself, but Musk eventually started to complain about the cost of subsidizing Ukraine, claiming [7]last October that doing so had cost the company more than $80 million up to that date.
In a letter sent by SpaceX to the DoD, Musk said he wanted the Pentagon to start picking up the tab for providing vital communications services for Ukraine, with the company claiming it would cost $120 million to the end of the year, and nearly $400 million for the following 12 months.
Now it appears that the Pentagon has caved to Musk's demands, although it is not clear when the contract for services to Ukraine came into effect or how much it is worth in dollar terms.
[8]AT&T warns T-Mobile US, Starlink may disrupt terrestrial cellphones
[9]SpaceX tries to de-orbit Amazon's request for a satellite broadband shortcut
[10]SpaceX lobs second-gen Starlink satellites into orbit
[11]Chinese defence boffins ponder microwaving Starlink satellites to stop surveillance
Back in February, it emerged that Starlink had taken unidentified steps to prevent Ukrainian forces from using its satellite service for what the company regarded as [12]unacceptable purposes , such as to remotely control drones.
At the time, SpaceX COO Gwynne Shotwell said that Starlink was never meant to be weaponized, but claimed that "Ukrainians have leveraged it in ways that were unintentional and not part of any agreement."
[13]
This may have had something to do with Russia issuing a [14]warning to the United Nations that commercial satellite systems like Starlink risked becoming legitimate military targets by allowing their services to be used in warzones.
Chinese military researchers also published a paper earlier this year suggesting that lasers and high-power microwaves might be used as a means to [15]disable Starlink satellites without blowing them up and creating vast amounts of debris that would threaten other satellites and spacecraft.
Starlink is estimated to have upwards of 4,000 Starlink communications satellites deployed into low Earth orbit via SpaceX launches, with the [16]most recent being a batch of 52 delivered in a launch on May 31. ®
Get our [17]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3411804/biden-administration-announces-additional-security-assistance-for-ukraine/
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZHpmhBwrTZ7UTjqK6TsJzAAAANE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://defensescoop.com/2023/06/01/pentagon-contracting-with-spacexs-starlink-to-provide-satellite-communication-capabilities-for-ukraine/
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZHpmhBwrTZ7UTjqK6TsJzAAAANE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZHpmhBwrTZ7UTjqK6TsJzAAAANE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZHpmhBwrTZ7UTjqK6TsJzAAAANE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/14/spacex_reports/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/22/att_warns_tmobile_and_starlink/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/22/amazon_spacex_satellite_spectrum/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/28/spacex_starlink_satellites/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/27/china_defence_research_starlink_countermeasures/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/09/spacex_starlink_ukraine_offensive/
[13] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZHpmhBwrTZ7UTjqK6TsJzAAAANE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/28/russia_raises_possibility_commercial_sats_strike/
[15] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/27/china_defence_research_starlink_countermeasures/
[16] https://spaceflightnow.com/2023/05/31/spacex-delivers-52-more-starlink-satellites-into-orbit/
[17] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: No good deed goes unpunished
Everything thing I read on this subject is messed up. IIRC Musk promised 3 months of unlimited data for some terminals. When six months passed he asked for a pay day, at the unlimited rate ($2500/month?). The response from Ukraine was that they only needed the standard $100/month plan. There are various reports that SpaceX provided between 0% and 100% of the terminals for free. Many organisations has itemised what they contributed. I have not seen such a statement from SpaceX (no reasonable person would consider "funding secured" tweets as a source of factual information).
I would not single out The Register because just about everybody gets this stuff wrong - most definitely including me.
Re: No good deed goes unpunished
Heck I wouldn't be surprised if SpaceX was taking the "free" service as a tax writeoff at the $2500 rate, which is why they balked at being paid only the standard $100 rates. Because then the IRS could question the previous deductions at the $2500 rate and force SpaceX to change those past writeoffs to the $100 rate.
Re: No good deed goes unpunished
Well observed - a bit of proper investigative reporting would be welcome here, since there have been multiple allegations that Musk has not, as first claimed, provided a free service but essentially used Ukraine as either a way to offload old Starlink equipment at massively inflated prices or to (once again) find a way to extract government money.
Certainly, any claim that this has been an entirely altruistic exercise doesn't seem to hold much water. Ultimately this appears to be a business deal, not a charity.
Re: No good deed goes unpunished
Apparently theregister thinks that Elon should pay Ukraine's starlink bill indefinitely. Defense contractors like Boeing and Lockheed aren't providing weapons for free. Should we complain about that too?
Re: No good deed goes unpunished
True but defence contractors like Boeing and Lockheed never said they where giving their weapon for free.
Does this now make Star link satellites military targets?
Re: No good deed goes unpunished
I read it again after seeing your post and I see nothing indicating "theregister thinks that Elon should pay Ukraine's starlink bill indefinitely".
No good deed goes unpunished
"Now it appears that the Pentagon has caved to Musk's demands." Huh? When Elon initially announced that SpaceX would supply Starlink to Ukraine, he stated that SpaceX would provide the service free-of-charge for 6 months. After that 6-month period was up, it was clear that Ukraine's need for Starlink was growing significantly and, although third parties had provided some of the funding required to continue paying for the service, SpaceX was continuing to provide a significant fraction of Starlink free-of-charge and it was not economical for SpaceX to continue doing so indefinitely. Now that the Pentagon is paying some/most/all of the cost of supplying Starlink to Ukraine, the Register journalist spins this into "the Pentagon has caved to Musk's demands."
Please leave your anti-Musk bias at the door when reporting a story, and stop criticising SpaceX/Musk for their generosity.