Top Google boffin Hinton quits, warns of AI danger, partly regrets life's work
- Reference: 1682980809
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2023/05/01/ai_geoffrey_hinton_resigns/
- Source link:
Hinton, 75, a computer science professor at the University of Toronto and a former Google top researcher, began studying neural nets long before they were in vogue. He has spent decades developing novel artificially intelligent algorithms and architectures, creating techniques to train models and process data. His research has paved the way for the current machine learning boom.
In 2018, [1]he won the prestigious Turing Award alongside Yoshua Bengio, a computer science professor at the University of Montreal, and Yann LeCun, chief AI scientist at Meta, for their work on deep learning.
[2]
Hinton said he resigned from Google last month and that a part of him now regrets his lifelong work in the field. "I console myself with the normal excuse: if I hadn't done it, somebody else would have," he [3]told former Reg vulture Cade Metz, who now writes for the NYT.
If I hadn't done it, somebody else would have
Hinton said he has grown progressively concerned about the risks of AI, especially after Google began building and rolling out [4]Bard , its own web search chatbot interface, to rival Microsoft's machine-learning powered [5]Bing .
To us at least, it appears Microsoft grabbed the chatbot ball from OpenAI and ran with it, very publicly splashing the tech [6]all over its software empire to impress netizens, and forcing Google to reluctantly play the game of catch up. Even though Google invented the transformer architecture underneath today's chat interfaces, uses machine learning widely behind the scenes, and seems uncertain about the positive impact of this technology on the world, the search king is nonetheless keen to give the [7]appearance that it is not left behind. Which means chat interfaces in everything Google now does.
[8]
[9]
Commercial interest drives competition between companies and inevitably advances the technology and pushes it into everyday life, making it difficult to mitigate its impacts on society, as Hinton put it.
"Look at how it was five years ago and how it is now. Take the difference and propagate it forwards. That's scary," he said.
[10]
Hinton added that generative AI tools that make it easy for anyone to create fake images, text, videos, and audio that people won't be able to tell what's true or not on the internet anymore.
[11]Trump fights with Google over Chinese military, AI scoops Turing Prize, Dota2 competition coming
[12]Mything the point: The AI renaissance is simply expensive hardware and PR thrown at an old idea
[13]UK.gov should spend more on AI, bleat VCs and consultants. Oh? Why's that then?
[14]Googlers revolt over AI military tech contract, brainiacs boycott killer robots, and more
These types of models can be instructed to write code, too, and that they could autonomously run their own programs in the future, he suggested. If left unchecked, the technology could one day create software and machines to the detriment of humans, so-called killer robots, he thought.
"The idea that this stuff could actually get smarter than people — a few people believed that," he said. "But most people thought it was way off. And I thought it was way off. I thought it was 30 to 50 years or even longer away. Obviously, I no longer think that."
Today's ML tools are being deployed across various industries and affecting mainly white-collar jobs, he opined. Analysts have predicted such models will increase the productivity of employees and companies; the technology could replace jobs while creating new ones. Hinton said AI "takes away the drudge work," but that the disruption of labor "might take away more than that."
Hinton [15]said he quit Google so that he could talk about the dangers of AI without upsetting his employer, and thought that the Silicon Valley goliath has "acted very responsibly." ®
Get our [16]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2019/04/01/ai_roundup_290319/
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZFCK4qW75LILs8myKyu1PwAAANg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/01/technology/ai-google-chatbot-engineer-quits-hinton.html
[4] https://www.theregister.com/2023/04/21/google_bard_ai/
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/17/microsoft_ai_bing_problems/
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/16/microsoft_365_copilot_ai_teaser/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2023/04/25/google_ai_security/
[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZFCK4qW75LILs8myKyu1PwAAANg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZFCK4qW75LILs8myKyu1PwAAANg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[10] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZFCK4qW75LILs8myKyu1PwAAANg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2019/04/01/ai_roundup_290319/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2018/11/06/andrew_fentem_on_ai/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2018/10/24/house_of_lords_ai_committee_report/
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2018/04/07/ai_roundup/
[15] https://twitter.com/geoffreyhinton/status/1652993570721210372
[16] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
My prediction
In the article: expert who has spent his life and career working with AI warning of the existential threat it represents.
In the comments: commentards with only superficial understanding of AI pedantically arguing that there's no such thing as true AI and that AI will never be more intelligent than humans and therefore cannot constitute a threat.
My Prediction
In the article: a retiring bloke with an overactive imagination.
In the comments: A load of still wet behind the ears oo'n and awe'n over regression, determined that it is a new paradigm rather than second year algebra.
In the cheap seats: A load of folks who remember the last time neural nets awed, over promised, and crashed like a dot com.
Key point of 'REAL' concern ...... not the point scoring as per usual by commentards !!!
"Hinton added that generative AI tools that make it easy for anyone to create fake images, text, videos, and audio that people won't be able to tell what's true or not on the internet anymore. "
Point I and others raised some years ago when the first attempts were made, and the first scams were successful.
After Trumps proof of the malleability of the 'masses', successfully copied by others .... oh what a joyful future we have to look forward to !!!
Can we rely on the 'Internet Giants' to protect us from the consequences of their quest for ever more information & control ..... I think not !!!
Careful what you read, see and hear as your senses are no longer reliable as 'arbiters of truth' !!!
The Truth is now what others define .... is the 'ground you stand on', in all senses, feeling a little bit less solid than before .... welcome to where the 'Internet Giants' et al want you to be !!!
:)
AI replaces AI godfather's job.
He's just annoyed AI is now laughing at him and actually gets the irony.
Take heart...
...medical diagnostic AI will save many lives.
(OK assuming the other **** doesn't destroy us all, but that isn't a reason for us not to leverage AI in more beneficial use cases meantime).
Re: Take heart...
Surgeon using AI trained to look for things that surgery can fix, physical therapist looking for things that physical therapy can fix, pharmaceutical companies looking for things a prescription can fix, and 'merican medical insurance looking for things that Ibuprofen can fix. I bet each offers a solution for whatever ails you.
AI concludes what you train it to. We'll be fine as long as we understand that it delivers knowledge but not truth.
Dumber and Dumber
"The idea that this stuff could actually get smarter than people — a few people believed that," he said. "But most people thought it was way off. And I thought it was way off. I thought it was 30 to 50 years or even longer away. Obviously, I no longer think that."
AI isn't smart, but given the hysterical overreaction to it by a large chunk of the population, he's probably just realised how dumb people are.