Fujitsu has bagged £142M UK government work since Horizon inquiry announced
- Reference: 1681828574
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2023/04/18/fujitsu_gets_142_million_uk/
- Source link:
Earlier this month, the Post Office awarded a £16.5 million contract to Fujitsu to extend its support for on-prem systems as its transition to the cloud was delayed.
“The program to transfer the services to a new cloud provider created fundamental technical challenges that [the Post Office] could not economically and technically overcome, and the business has taken the decision to pivot back to the Fujitsu provided Horizon Data Centres until the successful transfer of services out of Horizon and into its replacement New Branch IT,” a tender [1]document said.
[2]
Faults in the Horizon system, first implemented in the 1990s, led to hundreds of false prosecutions carried out by internal Post Office investigators with the help of contractor Fujitsu. Even though managers inside the Post Office were repeatedly warned about the bugs making their prosecutions legally unsafe, the evidence was covered up – and wrongful prosecutions continued regardless. Thirty-nine convictions were overturned in April 2021, with up to 400 more potentially being quashed after the Post Office wrote to them all.
[3]
[4]
In May 2021, [5]the government launched a statutory public inquiry into the Post Office Horizon scandal to create legal powers to force witnesses to give evidence.
At the time, junior business minister Paul Scully said: "The Horizon saga has wrecked lives and livelihoods. We can't undo the damage that has been done. But we can establish what went wrong with the Post Office and ensure something like this is never allowed to happen again."
[6]
Deals have continued to be awarded despite the on-going enquiry. Using publicly available procurement notices, The Register estimates at least £142 million has been awarded to Fujitsu by the UK public sector since the inquiry was launched, excluding its place on potentially lucrative framework agreements.
In December last year, the government — which wholly owns the Post Office — awarded Fujitsu a £52 million (c $60 million) contract in the same week [7]political leaders called for all local deals with the company to be stopped while it is in the dock over the Post Office Horizon scandal .
[8]Fujitsu sets out on 5-year mission to standardize ERP on SAP S/4HANA
[9]UK Prime Minister wants £800M to spend on big British iron
[10]Fujitsu's A64FX successor will be an Arm-based datacenter chip
[11]Amid the gloom of widespread layoffs, Fujitsu is hiring and acquiring
Labour MP Kate Osborne said: "The government are still awarding multimillion-pound contracts to Fujitsu. An apology from Fujitsu is not enough. Will the Secretary of State commit to pausing and reviewing all existing government contracts with that appalling company?"
Just weeks before ministers announced the statutory inquiry, [12]the Post Office awarded Fujitsu a £42.5 million extension on its Horizon work .
Get our [13]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/010251-2023
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZD6@onG3zr-sv-EVcdDMlQAAAAs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZD6@onG3zr-sv-EVcdDMlQAAAAs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZD6@onG3zr-sv-EVcdDMlQAAAAs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/19/post_office_horizon_scandal_public_inquiry_announced/
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZD6@onG3zr-sv-EVcdDMlQAAAAs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/28/the_uk_government_has_awarded/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2023/04/11/fujitsu_one_erp/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/09/uk_prime_minister_wants_800m/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/06/fujitsus_a64fx_successor_will_be/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/02/fujitsu_acquires/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2021/04/07/post_office_fujitsu_horizon_extension/
[13] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Shares anyone?
You do really have to start to question who is benefiting from these deals. For once I don't think it's all Tory related, but there are people entrenched in the establishment that are benefiting from these deals, and sadly I don't think we'll ever find out who.
Re: Shares anyone?
While I'm sure the "right" answer is important to you these contract are awarded by civil servants and the Post Office is a private company.
I doubt it is possible to for a government to ban Fujitsu but without a doubt the real difficulty is that once any organisation fails to (a) consider the importance of interoperability and (b) fail to ask the question "and how do I get rid of you lot?" (to reframe Tony Benn's quote about democratic processes) the only way forward is carry ob with who you have got or a clone. The case study of d'addario strings' decison to rip out (in this case) Microsoft and go FOSS is as rare as it is instructive. They were stung by a licensing audit for software they were not even using and wanted at any cost to be rid of the shackle.
Horizon, as Private Eye reported for many years, was shameful. Failure to consider (a) and (b) above makes the disruption caused by ripping it out inconceivable. That's the real cost of these projects. It's true of all these deeply embedded outsourcers, especially once they have sold in their various secret sauces.
You should direct your ire and vitriol towards those at the operational level who took the decisions back in the day, after suitable technical visits to nice parts of the world provided by any of the usual suspects and other soft (or less soft) corruption.
Re: Shares anyone?
It would be difficult to ban them but might not be impossible. The tender pre-qualification process for large contracts is used to ensure that only companies which have a chance of winning are allowed to tender. Technical, organizational and financial assessments form part of the pre-qual. process and it's not unusual to have clauses about convictions, outstanding legal/regulatory compliance issues, bringing the client into disrepute, and so on. A suitably motivated lawyer could word this to ensure that Fujitsu weren't allowed to tender for anything at least until all inquiries and legal actions were complete.
Re: Shares anyone?
The husband of Gillian Keegan (Education Secretary) might. His name is Michael Keegan, and he's a former CEO of Fujitsu UK & Ireland. He's currently a Crown Representative at the Cabinet Office.
"We can't undo the damage that has been done."
Errrm: yes, it is easy. Compensate those who's lives were wrecked so that they are put into the financial positions that they would have been if this had not happened.
Then: look at damage due to anguish, etc, caused and thoroughly compensate them (and their kids, etc) for that.
The trouble with this is that there are many, many postmasters, etc, who were effected and so many in government have decided that compensation is "not affordable", so just say some fine words, theatrically wring hands and delay until most of them are dead or burned out.
How many of those who knew, or should have known but looked the other way, have been brought to book ?
Re: "We can't undo the damage that has been done."
The UK government can award the contract and then pay invoices due as compensation to the Horizon victims. Ie. Effectively the same as forced payroll deductions for child maintenance etc.
More often than not I think the status quo is kept because Fujitsu are too big to fail. Yeah, it would be great if the work was given out to a "proper" UK company with a specific focus on these types of projects, but they often lack the financial wherewithal to weather any kind of legal storms. Sad but true.
I'm not defending any current politicians, but if Wikipedia can be relied upon for facts, the genesis of this project was in 1996, so many politicians of all stripes have had the opportunity to bask in the warm glow of a stuffed brown envelope or two along the way.
Shares anyone?
So, which Tory spivs hold Fujitsu shares then?