Today's old folks set to smash through longevity records
- Reference: 1680243907
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2023/03/31/age_longevity_records/
- Source link:
Those born between 1910 and 1950 – the next cohort to reach "advanced old age" – have the potential to add a decade to the "human mortality plateau." That's the point at which life expectancy typically levels off, professors David McCarthy and Po-Lin Wang write in [1]their paper .
The interesting thing about that is the study looked at mortality data from the 1700s up to today, and found the plateau was relatively unchanged over that period. That's a very long time to go without much of a change in maximum lifespan.
[2]
With that plateau so stable for so long, the researchers (a pair of risk management and insurance professors from University of Georgia and University of South Florida) suggest that at first glance the evidence suggests there is a hard limit to human lifespan. Under that assumption, improvements in mortality rates are largely due to a phenomenon known as "mortality compression" that sees premature death being prevented.
[3]
[4]
But, they observe, there are two historical periods in which the plateau has risen. The first, which came in the second half of the 19th century, saw the plateau jump by around five years. The researchers speculate it may be related to a wave of improvements in public health and medical technology – like the acceptance of germ theory and the widespread adoption of vaccines.
We're experiencing the second rise now – particularly those of us born between 1910 and 1950, who also lived through leaps in healthcare technology and understanding. This, the pair write, indicates we're not just compressing mortality, but postponing it entirely. The speculate that the actual biological limit of the human body hasn't been reached.
[5]
"The timing of these episodes of mortality postponement explain why longevity records have been so slow to increase in recent years – cohorts old enough to have broken longevity records were too old to experience the current bout of postponement," the researchers opine.
[6]Potatoes in space: Boffins cook up cosmic concrete for off-world habitats
[7]Boffins: Microgravity impacts cell repair systems in proteins
[8]Boffins claim discovery of the first piezoelectric liquid
[9]Scientists speak their brains: Please don't call us boffins
Sorry, Americans – we're getting left out
The pair observe in their paper that mortality postponement – their term for when we don't just compress the [10]candlestick chart of human lifespan but increase the range entirely – could vary wildly. Indeed it does, depending on modelling assumptions – this is predictive work, after all.
It's also not a sure thing.
"Cohorts born before 1950 will only have the potential to break existing longevity records if policy choices continue to support the health and welfare of the elderly, and the political, environmental and economic environment remains stable," the researchers conclude.
For citizens of the US, the signs are already indicating that's not the case. Late last year US health officials said that life expectancy in that country was [11]down for the second year in a row – now sitting at just 76.1 years.
[12]
Other countries have experienced a rebound since COVID-19 deaths have begun slowing. There could be many reasons for lower life expectancies and rising [13]maternal and [14]childhood mortality rates in the United States.
Japan – where McCarthy and Wang observe women are at the forefront of human longevity – has seen its life expectancy increase beyond pre-pandemic levels to 84.5 years. In the UK, averages are still down from pre-COVID-19 levels, but have increased slightly since last year to 80.8 years. ®
Get our [15]Tech Resources
[1] https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0281752#sec006
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZCavREt9CyeM2TkYpUxvwwAAAME&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZCavREt9CyeM2TkYpUxvwwAAAME&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZCavREt9CyeM2TkYpUxvwwAAAME&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZCavREt9CyeM2TkYpUxvwwAAAME&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/20/spuds_in_space_make_cosmic/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/30/microgravity_changes_cell_repare_systems/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/29/piezoelectric_liquid_discovery/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/29/scientists_boffins/
[10] https://www.investopedia.com/trading/candlestick-charting-what-is-it/
[11] https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2023/03/25/1164819944/live-free-and-die-the-sad-state-of-u-s-life-expectancy
[12] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZCavREt9CyeM2TkYpUxvwwAAAME&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[13] https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/maternal-mortality/2021/maternal-mortality-rates-2021.htm
[14] https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2802602
[15] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Very apt as a lot of modern medicine is focused on simply keeping people alive, without too much care about their wellbeing
Modern medicine is focused on not letting one die and not allowing people to die. Its extent depends highly on local, cultural, social and legal traditions. But death has become taboo in many "western" type societies. Many have laws that result in a rule that "forbid" you to die, regardless well being. Another situation is when family cannot "cope" with death and don't allow you to die.
We have outsourced caring for the elderly, putting them in homes for old people. We do no longer experience the problems associated with old age because we have sent the old ones to homes.
That's why a lot of research is refocusing on what they call "Healthspan", not "Lifespan", i.e. extending the period of healthy life. Several surveys have confirmed that people aren't too fussed specially with living (much) longer, but they'd rather be healthier, active and alert during the time they do have,
So researchers surmised that keeping people alive when they're in bad health, suffering, immobile or dependent on others for daily functioning, is counter productive or even "torture".
It's better to work towards improving quality of life. A side-effect might well be that whatever we do to remain healthy and alert, also feeds into us living longer. Bonus.
All this also up-ends a lot of social contracts around age of retirement. We're close to where our "retired" life time matches our economic productive life time. There's only so much compound interest can do to build retirement/pension funds.
Sshhhhh!!!!!
Don't tell the Politicians about this study! They'll take it as yet another excuse to raise the retirement age!
(Beer icon, because just the thought of how many more years I still have to work, has me reaching for a glass....)
Re: Sshhhhh!!!!!
In the UK the latest review has ruled out bringing the rise from 67 to 68 forwards as life expectancy seems to have plateaued. Not that the suggested change would have mattered to me as I'll (hopefully) be retired before then.
Re: Sshhhhh!!!!!
Statins, ace inhibitors, beta blockers and the like all handed out for free by the NHS have driven down mortality from some causes but led to an increase in other debilitating illnesses as more people live on past where they might otherwise have reached.
Re: Sshhhhh!!!!!
So the neoliberal paradises of the USA & UK have static or falling life expectancy, whilst in the socialist paradises of Western Europe (ex UK) it continues to rise. I wonder why that is?
Re: Sshhhhh!!!!!
Always makes me laugh.
What's the point of raising retirement age when you can no longer get a job after 50 ?
Longevity in the US
Has been privatised.
All praise the mighty dollar!
No money, no care, no chance.
Re: Longevity in the US
And here in the UK, there are a group who want to push us in to your delightful US model of healthcare. Our life expectancy is the 2nd worst in the G7 - behind the US.
The unfortunate thing is that, normally, you would expect me to point at the Tories for it but oh no. Labour are just as bad, and Sir Beer Korma and others have been receiving donations from people who work in the private health care sector.
Re: Longevity in the US
Ah yes - Americans. The nation with the best teeth and the worst health on the planet.
Re: Longevity in the US
I think I see a corelation here: good teeth means you can eat more junk food thus worse health.
"life expectancy in [the USA]"
It might improve the day you guys no longer have an entire supermarket aisle devoted to upteen flavors of potato chips.
Just a thought . . .
Re: "life expectancy in [the USA]"
I'd maybe suggest that it's more to do with not having an aisle filled with guns, and an entire counter at the chemist handing out Opiates like Candy.
(Over 50,000 deaths caused by guns in the US in 2021 (majority Suicide) according to the CDC, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41488081. And unfortunately, I can no longer find the Opiates Death article but it was a similar number of deaths. 100,000 people dying early, the vast majority not being already "old", drags down the average life expectancy in a very big way!).
How long will the elephant in the room live?
This study is all very well, but it is heavily focused on the developed nations. The US statistics suggest that this is not representative of humanity at large.
So here's the elephant in the room; what about indigenous populations of South America, India, China and Africa? These include the two largest nations on Earth, and - the elephant int he room whispers in my ear - might just alter the species statistics a tiny bit, no? And given that elephants themselves are notoriusly long-lived, I credit it with some experience of these things.
Re: How long will the elephant in the room live?
As nations develop, lifting the vast majority of their people out of poverty, you see the life expectancy grow massively. Up until you hit what was previously considered the plateau.
That's why the focus of this article would have been on the West. Western nations are pretty uniform on maximum life expectancy, and most of the rest of the world is slowly rising to match as their people rise to a "western" standard of living (i.e. access to accessible health care, sufficient nutrition, etc.). As such, if you're interested in what the maximum could be, then you explore those already at the maximum.
Oh and as for America, it's values are dropping primarily due to other factors - gun deaths, opiate abuse, unhealthy lifestyles, etc. So many people dying young, drags the average down...
Everybody
dies eventually.
The idea [of most people] is to have a good life, not necessarily a long one!
Consider: Your life expectancy is ruled by your immune system, which starts failing at puberty!
Life expectancy and healthy-life-expectancy are separated by a few decades.
Living a long is only appealing if it is free of the problems of old age, just ask Tithonus :(