News: 1679509808

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Space dust that regularly hits Earth could contain proof of alien life

(2023/03/22)


If we want to find evidence for alien life we don't need to keep looking for chemicals in exoplanet atmospheres or distant radio signals, says a Japanese astronomer. Instead, we should be studying the thousands of micrometer-sized bits of interstellar dust that hit Earth every year.

University of Tokyo Professor Tomonori Totani proposed the new approach in a [1]paper in which he suggests bits of space dust could contain the remains of single-celled organisms or other chemical evidence of life.

This dust would, of course, have to make it through the inhospitable gauntlet of its own solar system and millions of years of travel through the void of space without being intercepted first. Despite the incredibly low chance that pieces of dust ejected from an exoplanet millions of years ago actually make it to Earth, Totani believes around 100,000 pieces of dust worth a look land on our planet every year.

[2]

"Given there are many unknowns involved, this estimate could be too high or too low, but the means to explore it already exist so it seems like a worthwhile pursuit," Totani [3]said .

Dust may already be here – but how can we tell it apart from ours?

Plenty of space rocks hit Earth each year, leaving behind meteorites filled with potential scientific discoveries. Unfortunately, in the process of entering the atmosphere, heat burns off a lot of material – like traces of biological life.

But the same rule doesn't apply to dust particles smaller than 10-100 micrometers, which Totani said are able to survive atmospheric entry without generating much heat, meaning biosignatures on or in the dust could survive the trip.

[4]

[5]

Micrometeorites have been found both in snow and ice samples from Antarctica, and deep-sea sediment, Totani said in the paper. He also noted, however, that identifying interstellar dust wouldn't be easy.

"Extrasolar particles scattered by giant planets and then bound to the Solar System may be difficult to distinguish from particles ejected from Earth, even if they contain biosignatures," Totani said in the paper. "Searching for particles with origins outside the solar system is like looking for grains of sand that have fallen into the desert," he added.

[6]

To catch these particles, Totani suggests trying to do so in space, instead of waiting for them to fall to Earth, by using material like [7]aerogel , a super-lightweight foam made from silica that's 95 percent air. NASA has already applied aerogel to such a purpose, in fact: During the [8]Stardust mission in the early 2000s, aerogel was used to catch bits of dust coming off a comet in a manner similar to what Totani proposes.

Why look at dust when we've got these cool telescopes?

With all the unknowns, and Totani's admission that "more quantitative considerations" and experiments are needed to prove his idea is feasible, the obvious question is why we should even bother going this route to find evidence of extraterrestrial life.

We're already scanning for distant radio signatures, and finding an identifiable one would be an unambiguous sign that life does exist somewhere outside Earth. Totani said these observations only look for intelligent life, which is probably far rarer than plants and unintelligent animals, potentially leaving tons of life undiscovered.

As for gathering profiles on the [9]chemical makeup of exoplanet atmospheres , Totani said any candidate biosignature found in that way would be controversial because oxygen and other indicators of life can occur in its absence.

[10]NASA: Yup, thousand-pound meteorite exploded over Texas

[11]Space dust reveals Earth-killer asteroids tough to destroy

[12]NASA reassigns Venus boffins to save short-staffed asteroid interceptor

[13]Oh, great. By peering into twilight, boffins find 'planet killer' asteroids in our system

If – and this is a pretty big if – we could find a way to sort the interstellar dust from the stellar, or if we could build a dust catcher with an effective area Totani described as "hopefully comparable to Earth … to expect one particle detection per year," then we might be able to find a dust particle that might contain traces of alien life.

Totani said: "If there are signs of life in dust grains, not only could we be certain, but we could also find out soon." ®

Get our [14]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ja/press/2023/8339/

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZBuIlwEBPz0mx8bMt0eayAAAAEs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://www.u-tokyo.ac.jp/focus/en/press/z0508_00283.html

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZBuIlwEBPz0mx8bMt0eayAAAAEs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZBuIlwEBPz0mx8bMt0eayAAAAEs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZBuIlwEBPz0mx8bMt0eayAAAAEs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2010/11/24/diy_insulation_with_aerogel/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2006/01/16/stardust_recovery/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/23/jwst_wasp_atmosphere/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/22/texas_meteorite_nasa/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/25/space_dust_asteroid/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/08/nasa_psyche_failure/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/01/three_close_asteroids_discovered/

[14] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



ET Origins

An_Old_Dog

Wouldn't it be ironic if the bio-agents which cause common colds had ridden down to Earth on dust particles, or in ice particles?

If so, the answer to, "Do alien lifeforms exist or not?" will have been right in front of up our noses all this time!

Great Science!

Version 1.0

This is an excellent description of the chance of life in the Universe, for years we've been looking for distant radio signatures but never considered how life evolved on our planet. Dr. Neil Shubin has released several books that explain how we became life - they are all wonderful and very helpful to read - if you find this article interesting then start reading Neil Shubin's explanations, he's so damn smart!

We know that life on our planet changed when the dinosaurs were extincted after an asteroid struck the Earth but had it been a bigger asteroid then our "life" would have been reduced to dust in the universe, which landing on another planet could have evolved into new life. I see the evidence described by Neil Shubin as virtual proof that life exists everywhere in the universe although looking at our planets history then the chances of intelligent life in the universe is very low, but not non-existent. However plants and fish may be surprisingly common because they have evolved so easily in our planetary environment although the chances of seeing anything like this on the rest of our sun's planets is virtually zero, life on Mars is the only slight possibility locally. But 40 light years away is seem almost 100% likely.

Re: Great Science!

DJO

Lot's of people have spent their entire careers considering how life evolved on our planet.

Panspermia is a bit of a cop-out and unnecessary. It suggests the chemicals needed to spark life came from a biome rather than lifeless coincidence but those chemicals are pretty common in space so while not ruling out panspermia it doesn't really matter.

As for intelligence, I'd suggest it's a reasonable probability once you get past the really serious roadblock - getting from single-celled to multi-celled. Here life popped along pretty quickly then didn't do much for a few billion years until about 600my ago when the first macroscopic multicellular life emerged (the first microscopic multicellular could be as much as 1by earlier - still being debated). The wormy things wriggled about for a few dozen million years then - ta da - The Cambrian Explosion - all hell breaks lose, pretty much every biological line is started, diversity goes crazy trying to find the best fit for any available niche. So once you have "plants and fish" you are well on the route to the possibility of intelligence emerging.

"Intelligence" can take many forms, our communicating, tool using brand of intelligence may not be that common but cetacean and cephalopod type intelligence could equally well exist. All that is before you start thinking about "it's life Jim but not as we know it" where all bets are off.

From the galaxy

Primus Secundus Tertius

We now know that the galaxy contains a lot of simple organic molecules such as ethanol. But on Earth, DNA largely disappears from fossils after a million years, and so does protein. A speck of dust travelling at 1/10,000 of the speed of light would take 40,000 years to get here from proxima centauri, so a journey of 100,000 years would cover 10 light years. Therefore there is a faint chance we could find a trace of life in a galactic dust particle.

This does mean the first life on Earth could have come from within our galaxy, but other galaxies are much too far away.

Coming to Stores Near You:

101 Grammatically Correct Popular Tunes Featuring:

(You Aren't Anything but a) Hound Dog
It Doesn't Mean a Thing If It Hasn't Got That Swing
I'm Not Misbehaving

And A Whole Lot More...