Meta chops another 10,000 employees, closes 5,000 vacancies
- Reference: 1678813206
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2023/03/14/meta_10000_jobs_cut/
- Source link:
This is the second time Meta has cut jobs to slash costs, the first coming [1]in November when CEO Mark Zuckerberg axed 11,000 roles after admitting the group hired too rapidly early in pandemic and needs to reduce expenses in a cooling economy.
In an email to employees – also [2]sent to the SEC [PDF] – the Meta boss today said the goal of efficiency is to "improve our financial performance in a difficult environment" and "make us a better technology company."
[3]
"Overall, we expect to reduce our team size by around 10,000 people and to close around 5,000 additional open roles that we haven't hired yet," he writes.
[4]
[5]
Bear in mind Meta employed about 87,000 people late last year, followed by those 11,000 cuts and now this 10,000 chop. That's a 25 percent drop from before the layoffs began, after a period of massive hiring.
Zuck says that year after year, Meta expanded revenues but last year was a "humbling experience" because the "world economy has changed and competitive pressures grew, and our growth slowed considerably."
[6]
In [7]calendar 2022 , Meta reported revenue of $116.7 billion, down 1 percent year-on-year and a 38 percent plunge in operating profit to $28.94 billion. A marked difference to prior financial years.
"At this point, I think we should prepare ourselves for the possibility that this new economic reality will continue for many years. Higher interest rates lead to the economy running leaner, more geopolitical instability leads to more volatility, and increased regulation leads to slower growth and increased costs of innovation. Given this outlook, we'll need to operate more efficiently than our previous headcount reduction to ensure success."
To deal with any resulting anxiety from the layoffs, kindly old Zuck says he is going to make the changes "as soon as possible in the year" to get the bad stuff done and "focus on the critical work ahead."
A leaner org will execute its highest priorities faster. People will be more productive, and their work will be more fun and fulfilling
Senior leaders will announce the details of the restructuring plans "focused on flattening our orgs, canceling lower priority projects, and reducing our hiring rates. With less hiring I've made the difficult decision to further reduce the size of our recruiting team." Those in recruitment will be in for a fun night tonight as they will be told who is in and out by tomorrow.
"We expect to announce restructurings and layoffs in our tech groups in late April, and then our business groups in late May. In a small number of cases, it may take through the end of the year to complete these changes. Our timelines for international teams will also look different, and local leaders will follow up with more details."
[8]
"This will be tough and there's no way around that," said the CEO, whose personal fortune stands at $64.4 billion. "It will mean saying goodbye to talented and passionate colleagues who have been part of our success."
Following the restructuring, Meta plans to "lift hiring and transfer freezes" in each group.
Removing jobs has an obvious impact on the balance sheet, but how do layoffs help to build a better company? Zuck says the flatter org chart will help by removing layers of middle management. As such Meta will also ask managers to become "individual contributors."
[9]Meta cranks Zuckerberg's personal security budget to $14m while cutting everything else
[10]Meta, which pays for web scraping, sues to stop web scraping
[11]Europe to consult on making Big Tech pay for the networks it floods
[12]Meta to add verification to Facebook and Insta under scheme that should avoid Twitter's Musk-stakes
[13]Former Facebooker alleges Meta drained users' batteries to test apps
"It's well-understood that every layer of a hierarchy adds latency and risk aversion in information flow and decision-making. Every manager typically reviews work and polishes off some rough edges before sending it further up the chain."
In another pillar to its Year of Efficiency (YoE) marketing plan, Zuckerberg also reckons "leaner is better." After chopping 13 percent of the workforce in November, "one surprising result is that many things have gone faster. In retrospect, I underestimated the indirect costs of lower priority projects."
He adds: "A leaner org will execute its highest priorities faster. People will be more productive, and their work will be more fun and fulfilling. We will become an even greater magnet for the most talented people. That's why in our Year of Efficiency, we are focused on canceling projects that are duplicative or lower priority."
The CEO thinks that as Meta has grown it has hired outside of its software engineering heartland and diluted the focus on the business. "As part of the Year of Efficiency, we're focusing on returning to a more optimal ratio of engineers to other roles. It's important for all groups to get leaner and more efficient to enable our technology groups to get as lean and efficient as possible. We will make sure we continue to meet all our critical and legal obligations as we find ways to operate more efficiently."
Investment in tools, including AI, is another priority for Meta under YoE to help engineers "write better code faster, enabling us to automate workloads over time, or identifying obsolete processes that we can phase out."
Engineers earlier in their career perform better on average when they work in-person with teammates at least three days a week
Borrowing a leaf out of Amazon's get-back-to-the-office playbook, Zuck says Meta analysis has shown that engineers who joined Meta before the pandemic and worked in-person are performing better than those that joined during the pandemic and work remotely.
"This analysis also shows that engineers earlier in their career perform better on average when they work in-person with teammates at least three days a week. This requires further study, but our hypothesis is that it is still easier to build trust in person and that those relationships help us work more effectively.
"As part of our Year of Efficiency, we're focusing on understanding this further and finding ways to make sure people build the necessary connections to work effectively. In the meantime, I encourage all of you to find more opportunities to work with your colleagues in person."
Zuckerberg started off today's announcement by claiming Meta is "building the future of human connections." It seems like those that aren't being canned will be expected to go into the office more often. Maybe he was referring to that. He can't mean his social media platforms, surely to goodness. ®
Get our [14]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/09/meta_redundancies_mark_zuckerberg/
[2] https://d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001326801/6f603a49-6320-472f-862d-926d0daa1dd8.pdf
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZBD8kbpoQPLPMZ3rA5ex9gAAAIQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZBD8kbpoQPLPMZ3rA5ex9gAAAIQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZBD8kbpoQPLPMZ3rA5ex9gAAAIQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZBD8kbpoQPLPMZ3rA5ex9gAAAIQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/02/meta_q4_2022/
[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZBD8kbpoQPLPMZ3rA5ex9gAAAIQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/16/meta_zuckerberg_security_budget/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/02/meta_web_scraping/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/24/europe_gigabit_transformation_consultation/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/20/meta_to_charge_content_creators/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/30/meta_negative_testing_lawsuit/
[14] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
re: Buy a yacht?
There are plenty of vessels previously owned by Russian Oligarchs for sale around the world. They are very gaudily furnished much like Trump Force 1. Zuck will be right at home there...
In case of Zuck, I think he can get the majority of shareholder votes with him.
Zuck has majority voting in the boardroom. His Class B stock gets 10 votes per share. Plus another holder of class B shares, Moskovitz, has a voting agreement that stipulates that he'll vote the same way Zuck does.
As of the end of Q4 (December 31, 2022), there were 2,225,763,078 Class A stock (publicly traded) and 366,876,470 Class B stock (not traded). With 10-to-1 voting power, that ~367M shares votes like ~3.67B shares, dwarfing Class A share's voting power.
Will Zuck do a Musk
Reduce the head count to the point that their web sites become fragile and risk total collapse ?
We can but hope.
Re: Will Zuck do a Musk
Facecrap, sorry "Meta", have just raked $35bn in profit last year so they could make everyone redundant and shut up shop thereby doing humanity a favour and saving it's sanity. Sadly I too dream of such a world...
“Building relationships”
Yes, this is important; but it doesn’t need to mean 3 days a week or more in an office.
We have quarterly team get together for a few days - work during day, dinner and hotel stay at night - our team is very together and strong. Sitting next to people who might get irritating after too long would likely weaken those relationships!
Re: “Building relationships”
Question:
Did your team originally form up under the working in the office pre-Covid, or is your team comprised of people brought together during WFH?
Re: “Building relationships”
Pre-covid, I'd spend an hour driving to the local branch office, fire up Skype/Teams/Slack/Webex and send and receive emails. Once or twice a year the whole team would fly to head office for a week of in-person meetings.
Post-covid, I walk into my home office, fire up Teams/Slack/Discord and send and receive emails. Cadence of physical meetings TBC, it's not been long enough to see.
For many people, it's far better to have occasional, pre-planned week-long meetups.
A lot of team bonding happens during face-to-face, but little to no actual work.
Re: “Building relationships”
A little from column A … etc
I joined post Covid, did some induction and eased from on site to predominantly remote working over a few weeks. But the team is international, the “on site” office only has a couple of regular tenants.
Being able to shake hands a break bread with people whom you collaborate with helps humanise otherwise text based and occasionally video based interactions.
Bovine Excrement by the Zuckload
e critical work ahead."
A leaner org will execute its highest priorities faster. People will be more productive, and their work will be more fun and fulfilling
Zuck must have been listening to the preaching of Elon the Magnificent.
Cutting a team in half does not lead to more fun and job satisfaction.
Zuck could have used a good number of the people laid off today to build a decent alternative to the shit show that Twitter has become since Elon the Mighty took over but no...
A plague on Zuck and Elon.
Year of Efficiency
So what happens in 12 months time, when you've had your year of efficiency? A year of doing fuck all?
Aren't you, as a tech company, meant to always bear efficiency in mind, so you can automate when possible and increase productivity?
Or is this really a Musk-style effort to slash the payroll, hoping that driving the remaining employees to breaking point will deliver the same amount of work as before? Hate to tell you this, but stressed out, nervous staff aren't going to be concentrating on efficiency, but rather gaming the metrics to try and keep their jobs.
Zuck says that... last year was a "humbling experience"
A humble Zuck? It doesn't sound very likely.
Agree. Clearly that was written by the marketing department - those words are not even in Zuck's dictionary.
> ... engineers earlier in their career perform better on average when they work in-person with teammates ...
If they'd actually thought about it, rather just done statistics, they might have wondered if that could be paraphrased as "inexperienced engineers can't achieve much without the help of more experienced colleagues". But then statistics is a mathematical tool for dealing with ignorance, after all.
IMO, "improve our financial performance in a difficult environment" and "make us a better technology company" usually translates to "unless I improve profits, the shareholders won't let me buy a yacht".