News: 1678131906

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

EU 'poised' to OK Microsoft's Activision biz gobble

(2023/03/06)


Microsoft may be catching a break on its contentious bid to buy game maker Activision Blizzard for $69 billion.

The European Union appears poised to clear the acquisition next month without asking Microsoft to divest any of its assets in return, according to a [1]report late last week from Reuters . A go-ahead from the EU would remove one hurdle from the software maker's path, but would still leave antitrust concerns in the US and UK to deal with.

Citing three unnamed sources, Reuters said that Microsoft's efforts to sign licensing deals with rivals is playing a role in the thinking of the EU, which is set to make its decision by April 25.

[2]

Microsoft president Brad Smith and other executives have argued that such licensing agreements will ensure that rivals like Sony, Nintendo, and Nvidia will have the same timing and access to popular Activision games – in particular Call of Duty – as Microsoft's Xbox division.

[3]

[4]

During a [5]barnstorming tour through Europe late last month that included meeting with regulators and Sony PlayStation executives, Smith announced 10-year licensing deals with Nintendo and Nvidia, each of which dropped their opposition to the acquisition.

If Microsoft buys Activision, it will bring Xbox PC games to Nvidia's GeForce NOW cloud gaming service and its more than 25 million members. In addition, Call of Duty will be available to Nintendo players, with new versions of the game being available to Nintendo at the same time that they come to Xbox.

[6]Microsoft's Mr Smith goes to Europe in quest to win Activision deal

[7]Microsoft-Activision deal will hurt UK gamers, says watchdog

[8]Activision-Blizzard pays $35m to send SEC away, Microsoft merger still in doubt

[9]Activision prevails as court tosses 'frat house' culture lawsuit

Sony remains the key holdout as both the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the UK's [10]Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) continue to question the acquisition. The CMA has suggested that Microsoft divest Call of Duty from the deal as a step toward getting the green light from UK regulators, a move Smith pushed back against.

The licensing agreements with competitors – the same deal has been offered to Sony – are designed to ensure that the widely popular game is accessible to 150 million more people, which should alleviate antitrust concerns, Smith said after meeting with EU regulators last month.

[11]

The Register has asked both Microsoft and the European Commission to comment and will update the story if either responds.

For its part, the FTC is suing Microsoft over antitrust concerns to stop the Activision acquisition from going forward. Microsoft won a skirmish in that battle on February 23 when a judge overseeing the case [12]sided with the software company in its efforts to force Sony to produce documents outlining exclusivity deals that Sony has with third-party game makers, including ones aimed at keeping some games from Microsoft's Xbox Game Pass subscription service.

Microsoft has argued that buying Activision is a way to make it more competitive in a global game console market dominated by Sony. However, Microsoft is ahead of its rivals in the growing games subscription service space, making more than 300 games available to players on a range of devices – not only Xbox consoles, but also PCs and mobile devices and the like – via Xbox Game Pass.

[13]

The software giant is also facing off against a federal lawsuit launched by gamers in California and last week responded to a motion for a preliminary injunction that would force it to press pause on the $68.7 billion buyout. It said that contrary to gamers' claims it could potentially withhold titles from rivals, its has signed agreements with Nvidia and Nintendo to share titles.

"Microsoft does not have the 'means' to withhold competitors' access to the downstream content because such withholding is contractually impossible," it argued in the [14]filing [PDF]. ®

Get our [15]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.reuters.com/markets/deals/eu-unlikely-demand-asset-sales-microsoft-activision-deal-sources-say-2023-03-02/

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZAZwl-0wm5S66QguS7KfcQAAAEo&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZAZwl-0wm5S66QguS7KfcQAAAEo&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZAZwl-0wm5S66QguS7KfcQAAAEo&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/26/microsoft_nvidia_nintendo_activision/e

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/26/microsoft_nvidia_nintendo_activision/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/08/microsoft_activision_uk_cma/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/03/activision_sec_settlement/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/19/activision_shareholder_suit_dismissed/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/08/microsoft_activision_uk_cma/

[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ZAZwl-0wm5S66QguS7KfcQAAAEo&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[12] https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/607003_d09412_-_order_on_motion_of_sony_interactive_entertainment_llc_to_quash_or_limit_subpoena_duces_tecum.pdf

[13] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ZAZwl-0wm5S66QguS7KfcQAAAEo&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[14] https://regmedia.co.uk/2023/03/06/3_22-cv-08991-jsc.pdf

[15] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



It not over

Snowy

Until it is over.

Groo The Wanderer

I have only one question:

Who got paid and how much?

Grogan

Now there are two big game companies that are dead to me. I won't be buying any Zenimax/Bethesda games (that's the one I'm more sore about... think Vulkan adoption) or Activision games, and I won't be buying them as gifts for family.

Eventually they will tie tied to the Microsoft store interface, thus RESTRICTING access to competitors that won't allow third party shit like that in their stores and cause complications for people who play games through translation. My life is Microsoft free, there are NO Windows computers here.

Microsoft pollutes everything they touch. I can't stand them, or their shitware.

elsergiovolador

Although Gates has stepped down from the board of directors of Microsoft, I will always see that company through the lens of this interview:

[1]Bill Gates says meetings with Jeffrey Epstein were 'a mistake'

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNAwUxZ5nfw

Late Stage Capitalism

elsergiovolador

Basically the EU okays that.

The end game is that everything will be owned by a handful of corporations and investment funds de facto controlling everything - which also happens to be the end of democracy.

Uncontrolled enlargement of corporations and investment funds owning them is a clear path to fascism.

You would think that EU would be against that.

Oh well.

Life is too short to be taken seriously.
-- Oscar Wilde