UK health minister confirms data platform worth £480m will replicate Palantir dashboards
- Reference: 1675681268
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2023/02/06/nhs_palantir_data_platform/
- Source link:
Palantir, which made its name creating data analytics technologies for the [1]CIA and US immigration agency ICE , is said to be making the competition a "must-win."
The company got a foothold in the National Health Service (NHS) during the pandemic, when it was one of a number of suppliers to build a "data store" to detail information about the spread of COVID-19 and its impact on the NHS, one of the world's largest healthcare providers.
[2]
It won a £23 million ($28 million) contract without competition to extend its work on the platform, built on its Foundry product. The deal, which was [3]extended without competition in January , was subject to threats of judicial review, after which the NHS agreed not to extend it without public consultation.
[4]
[5]
Also in January, NHS England and NHS Improvement [6]launched the competition for a new £480 million ($580 million) data platform which promised to provide "the connectivity [which] will enable us to rapidly scale and share innovative solutions that directly addresses the challenges most pressing for the NHS," according to [7]an NHS England blog .
Potential suppliers of the new system have questioned whether Palantir has an unfair advantage in the competition given it built the existing dashboards and data platform the NHS expects to migrate to the FDP.
[8]
In November 2022, [9]supplier documents showed that existing services based on the NHS implementation of Foundry were "within the scope of the requirement for the Federated Data Platform and would be transitioned to the FDP as part of its implementation in place of the existing platform."
In response to a Parliamentary question late last week, Nicholas Francis Markham, member of the House of Lords and under-secretary of state in the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), confirmed existing dashboards within Foundry would be interoperable.
"Over the coming months, an assessment will be undertaken to determine which dashboards will be migrated to the new Federated Data Platform and which will be decommissioned. The format of the specifications for these dashboards will be developed as part of the planned transition activities of the programme," [10]he said .
[11]That NHS England patient data platform procurement, FDP, is live. And worth up to £480m
[12]Government tech spending in England more than doubles in five years
[13]NHS England Palantir contract extension could result in further legal threats
[14]Palantir's Covid-era UK health contract extended without competition
The precise meaning of that statement can be open to technical interpretation. It is possible the technology in Foundry, a proprietary system, may be interoperable without necessarily offering a level playing field to alternative suppliers hoping to replicate its dashboards.
Last week, NHS Digital, a wing of the DHSC responsible for digital strategy in the health service, finally bit the dust. It officially merged with NHS England, completing [15]a move first announced by then health secretary Sajid Javid in 2021 .
[16]
Merging the three bodies responsible for tech health strategy and delivery – NHS England, NHSX and NHS Digital – would create a "single organisation to lead the NHS in England to deliver high-quality services for all," according to NHS England.
"The move brings the NHS' national data and technology expertise into one organisation, creating a closer link between the collection and analysis of data to help drive improvement to patient outcomes," [17]NHS England said .
But others have expressed concern that it could lead to a lack of legal oversight of patient privacy, given the specific legal powers NHS Digital was given.
Writing in the British Medical Journal last year, former NHS Digital chairman Kingsley Manning, said: "Doing away with an independent statutory body in NHS Digital, charged with defending patient rights, is itself, unfortunate. But handing that body and its powers to NHS England, [18]is a grave error ."
NHS England said the merged operation would "include all existing protections for data" and sees "NHS England become the custodian of national health and social care datasets and the single executive non-departmental public body with responsibility for digital technology, data and health service delivery in the NHS." ®
Get our [19]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2020/08/26/palantir_s_1_ipo_filing_ice/
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/databases&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Y@EyMbchDLNZkdGV@LqeowAAAEY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/04/palantirs_covidera_uk_health_contract/
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/databases&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y@EyMbchDLNZkdGV@LqeowAAAEY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/databases&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Y@EyMbchDLNZkdGV@LqeowAAAEY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/11/nhs_england_launches_procurement_for/
[7] https://www.england.nhs.uk/blog/better-insights-better-decisions-better-health/
[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/databases&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y@EyMbchDLNZkdGV@LqeowAAAEY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/21/nhs_palantir_federated_data_platform/
[10] https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-01-12/HL4714
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/11/nhs_england_launches_procurement_for/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/11/government_tech_spending_england/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/06/nhs_england_palantir_contract_extention/
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/04/palantirs_covidera_uk_health_contract/
[15] https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/18/nhs_health_tech_reorg/
[16] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/databases&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Y@EyMbchDLNZkdGV@LqeowAAAEY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[17] https://digital.nhs.uk/news/2023/nhs-digital-and-nhs-england-complete-merger
[18] https://www.theregister.com/2022/03/04/nhs_digital_privacy_bmj_article/
[19] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Er, I've only seen this when there's a pre-decided procurement decision....
On the plus side, you didn't have to deal with that (bad) employer anymore.
WEF
Potential suppliers of the new system have questioned whether Palantir has an unfair advantage in the competition given it built the existing dashboards and data platform the NHS expects to migrate to the FDP.
Well. Palantir is a member of WEF and so are many figures in government.
There is totally no conflict of interest and it's just a coincidence and conspiracy theory. One must be nuts to think that this is all staged.
Candid question: If merging NHS Digital with NHS England will bring "the NHS' national data and technology expertise into one organisation, creating a closer link between the collection and analysis of data to help drive improvement to patient outcomes", why was NHS Digital created in the first place?
As an outsider, the requirement looks like being made to favour one competitor over the other ones.
Data Sovereignty
Avoiding the NGO/quango issue, data sovereignty must be retained. Non-UK companies that answer to their own governments are not welcome !
No other nation state's companies should be needed anyway. UK company and UK location.
What's the impediment? No backhanders is all I can see.
Ah, Palantir will obviously display their platform...
Which is on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying ‘Beware of the Leopard.
A cynic writes...
Mmmm... Federated. Does that mean Palantir keeps the data on the existing back end and new dishy "dashboards" get plonked on the front end so everyone thinks it's a new system? For 480million, I'll do a few tweaks to the CSS and a different URL.
Do You Like Them "Protections"??? No! No! No!
Quote: 'NHS England said the merged operation would "include all existing protections for data" '
Oh yes....."protections for data"......like:
Link: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jul/03/google-deepmind-16m-patient-royal-free-deal-data-protection-act
.....where Google/DeepMind slurped 1.6 million patient medical records from the Royal Free Trust.....no consent......and absolutely no enforcement activity....no penalties....six years and counting!!
.....yup......there's "protections" for you.....more of the same to come"!!
Er, I've only seen this when there's a pre-decided procurement decision....
This stops best-of-breed innovation (maybe Palantir dashboards are not the best?), gives Palantir a competitive advantage and gives competitors extra cost.
Years ago as a solution supplier I was having my arm twisted to buy an unproven software product by someone who had many fingers in many pies. I was told I had to buy the the specified software and if I didn't they'd write the requirements in such a way that only the software wanted would fit (they specified the colour of text and font on a screen).
I refused, got turfed out, software bought, software failed (underestimated complexity of install), new software got bought to replace and trebles all around!