GPT-4 could pop up in Bing, as Google races to build chatbot search products
- Reference: 1675362610
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2023/02/02/microsoft_gpt4_google_search/
- Source link:
Text-generation models have evolved from being able to autocomplete text to being able to carry out more general natural language tasks. GPT-4 is expected to be more powerful than its predecessors, ChatGPT and GPT-3, with new capabilities to generate higher quality text and respond to a wider range of input queries.
As the lead investor in OpenAI, Microsoft has bagged the rights to deploy OpenAI's products exclusively. Now, Microsoft reportedly wants to use GPT-4 to power web search and is set to incorporate the new system into Bing over the coming weeks, [1]according to SemaFor.
[2]
Meanwhile, Google is stepping up efforts testing large language models rivalling ChatGPT and building new AI search products in a bid to remain competitive. Executives launched a project codenamed "Atlas", and have pulled together engineers and tasked them with developing a similar system. Staff are also reportedly experimenting with a chatbot called "Apprentice Bard" to build a search desktop application based on its LaMDA language model, according to [3]CNBC .
[4]
[5]
It's unclear how these types of models are being applied for web search. Although there is some evidence that large language models can recall and extract information from its training data, they tend to get facts wrong. The internet is constantly changing; new websites and pages are updated and added all the time as new knowledge surfaces. Tools like ChatGPT, however, can only operate within the confines of their training data.
[6]Microsoft can't stop itself blowing billions on OpenAI
[7]Universities offered software to sniff out ChatGPT-written essays
[8]OpenAI offers error-prone AI detector amid fears of a machine-stuffed future
[9]Of course U2 is one of Bill Gates' favorite bands
The initial version of GPT-3, for example, was trained on internet text scraped until 2019 and would still say Donald Trump was the US president. Still, Microsoft seems hellbent in trying to revamp Bing and Google doesn't want to fall behind.
According to a UBS research note published yesterday, ChatGPT had an estimated 100 million monthly users in January, which if correct would make it the fastest growing consumer app ever.
Also on Wednesday, OpenAI [10]launched ChatGPT Plus, a new subscription service providing users faster access to the model for $20 per month. The current ChatGPT version will still be free, but is often inundated with requests and isn't always available to use. ChatGPT Plus will only be available to customers in the United States at first.
[11]
OpenAI is going to release a ChatGPT API for startups and businesses looking to build new AI products based on its capabilities, and is also reportedly developing a ChatGPT mobile app too. ®
Get our [12]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.semafor.com/article/02/01/2023/chatgpt-is-about-to-get-even-better-and-microsofts-bing-could-win-big
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Y9xAlSXLZkTWqLhZSFn2-gAAAEU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/31/google-testing-chatgpt-like-chatbot-apprentice-bard-with-employees.html
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y9xAlSXLZkTWqLhZSFn2-gAAAEU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Y9xAlSXLZkTWqLhZSFn2-gAAAEU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/23/microsoft_openai_applications/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/23/turnitin_chatgpt_detector/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/31/openai_tool_chatgpt_detection/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/16/bill_gates_reddit_ama/
[10] https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt-plus/
[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y9xAlSXLZkTWqLhZSFn2-gAAAEU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[12] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Fools errand
People don't need their search results dressed up as a fake conversation. People need accurate and relevant search results. Google et al have been actively stripping utility out of their search engines to drive traffic to paid search and force users to scroll past as much garbage as possible. GPTs 1 to infinity won't fix that.
Worse, if they put it in charge of the output answers and results, it will happily feed garbage dressed up as content in place of actual information. This will in the fullness of time, literally kill people.
And if it used to improve interpretation of the users intent in the search box, why have they intentionally removed the existing and more efficient tools like "-" to exclude results, and the old advanced search tools? The answer was it cost more to process and made them less money.
In reality, this will likely amount to more buzzwordy AI bullshit that won't make search results any better, won't work reliably, and only exists to deflect peoples attention from a possible alternative.
Re: Fools errand
> People don't need their search results dressed up as a fake conversation
I would say that they also don't need their search results expressed as plausible but wrong opinion rather than objective fact.
Well, it seems that plenty of people do, in fact*, want plausible but wrong, but the species as a whole is doomed if that's what we get by default.
-A.
*With respect to Majikthise and Vroomfondel
Sorry AC
I clicked the downvote button in error. Have two virtual upvotes.
-A.
In things that is not wanted or needed
Here is a good example of something that was not asked for, serves no purpose and is not going to be used.
...would still say Donald Trump was the US president....
That's exactly what Donnie and his fan club still claim.