Google ready to kick the cookie habit by Q3 2024, for real this time
(2023/02/01)
- Reference: 1675240207
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2023/02/01/google_cookie_sandbox/
- Source link:
Google's delayed disposal of third-party cookies – data stored in web browsers for advertising and analytics, among other things – will kick off the third quarter of 2024.
The ad biz intends to press ahead with its Topics API for interest-based advertising, despite being told by the Technical Architecture Group (TAG) of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) that the project " [1]appears to maintain the status quo of inappropriate surveillance on the web."
In documents filed with the UK Competition and Markets Authority as part of its public commitment to play nice with rivals while it reconfigures the way online advertising works, Google provided [2]an update [PDF] on the progress of its [3]Privacy Sandbox – a set of code projects to reconcile targeted advertising with some lax notion of privacy.
[4]
"In Q3 2024, Chrome will phase out support for third-party cookies over a two-month period," Adzilla promised in its report.
[5]
[6]
Previously, Google had intended to toss third-party cookies [7]by the end of 2022 . Then it was [8]by the end of 2023 . As of July, 2022, the target date had been [9]pushed back to the second half of 2024.
Google [10]announced its Privacy Sandbox back in 2019 and the plan has been to replace third-party cookies – which make it easy to track people online and create profiles of online behavior – with something less invasive.
[11]
Technologies being developed include:
the [12]Topics API , for collecting browsing history data to determine the browser user's interests;
the [13]FLEDGE API , for running an on-device ad auction based on the user's interests;
the [14]Attribution Reporting API , for measuring ad clicks;
the [15]Private State Tokens API , for fighting fraud without tracking;
the [16]First Party Sets API , for treating different domains owned by the same company as the same for browser security purposes; and others.
First Party Sets can be activated by setting a feature flag in Chrome 108 or later. Topics, FLEDGE, and the Attribution Reporting APIs are scheduled to be available in the third quarter of 2023.
[17]Home Depot sent my email, details of stuff I bought to Meta, customer complains
[18]Walmart runs creepy 'advergame' on Roblox, where kids can make toy wish lists
[19]Break up Google now, says US govt in ad monopoly lawsuit
[20]Hey, online pharmacies: Quit spreading around everyone's data already
As far as the UK CMA is concerned, Google is complying with its commitments to report on the progress of its Privacy Sandbox proposals and to engage with the online community to address concerns.
In the case of Topics – which the W3C's TAG said [21]gathers data in a way that's opaque and outside user control – Google suggests the alternative is paywalls and spurned advertisers giving users the finger by building digital fingerprints of their browsers to track them regardless of their wishes.
"We believe the benefit to users is that Topics support interest-based ads that keep the web free and open, and we also believe it significantly improves privacy compared to third-party cookies. Removing third-party cookies without viable alternatives may negatively impact publishers, and could lead to [22]worse approaches which are less private, are not transparent, and are not realistically resettable or controlled by users," the search leviathan argued in its filing.
Google maintains many companies are interested in the Topics API and other Privacy Sandbox technologies, and insists that its ad tech tools can advance privacy while supporting an open web.
[23]
As for addressing the specific points raised by the W3C's TAG, Google says it will respond publicly – at some point. In the meantime, it considers the development of Topics more important.
"At this stage, since Google has received questions from the ecosystem about what this review may imply for the development and launch of the Topics API, we would like to reaffirm our plan to make it available in Chrome Stable this year," the ad biz said in its response.
"While Google appreciates the input of the W3C Technical Architecture Group, it considers it of paramount importance to continue the efforts to develop and test Topics in consultation with the CMA and the ecosystem."
The CMA in its [24]update [PDF] on Google's compliance acknowledges the TAG review of Topics and says it's looking into the matter.
"We and the ICO [Information Commissioner's Office] are continuing to consider the potential impacts of the Topics API on privacy as well as market impacts, as set out in the Development and Implementation Criteria in the Commitments," the competition agency reported. ®
Get our [25]Tech Resources
[1] https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/726#issuecomment-1379908459
[2] https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63d7b357e90e0773e17b27d3/Privacy_Sandbox_Progress_Report_to_the_CMA_2022_Q4.pdf
[3] https://privacysandbox.com/
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/devops&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Y9pGUiXLZkTWqLhZSFkJJwAAAFg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/devops&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y9pGUiXLZkTWqLhZSFkJJwAAAFg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/devops&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Y9pGUiXLZkTWqLhZSFkJJwAAAFg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2020/01/14/google_third_party_cookies_user_agent/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/25/google_thirdparty_cookies/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/28/google_postpones_thirdparty_cookie_phaseout
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2019/08/22/google_chrome_privacy_sandbox/
[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/devops&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y9pGUiXLZkTWqLhZSFkJJwAAAFg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[12] https://developer.chrome.com/docs/privacy-sandbox/topics/
[13] https://developer.chrome.com/docs/privacy-sandbox/fledge/
[14] https://developer.chrome.com/docs/privacy-sandbox/attribution-reporting/
[15] https://developer.chrome.com/docs/privacy-sandbox/trust-tokens/
[16] https://developer.chrome.com/docs/privacy-sandbox/first-party-sets/
[17] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/27/home_depot_meta/
[18] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/25/walmarts_advergame_on_roblox_pushes/
[19] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/24/doj_google_ad_monopoly_antitrust/
[20] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/20/online_pharmacies_data_sharing/
[21] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/18/google_topics_api/
[22] https://github.com/mikewest/privacy-budget/issues/6
[23] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/devops&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Y9pGUiXLZkTWqLhZSFkJJwAAAFg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[24] https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63d7b9a88fa8f5188ae8f788/CMA_update_report_-_January_2023__.pdf
[25] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
The ad biz intends to press ahead with its Topics API for interest-based advertising, despite being told by the Technical Architecture Group (TAG) of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) that the project " [1]appears to maintain the status quo of inappropriate surveillance on the web."
In documents filed with the UK Competition and Markets Authority as part of its public commitment to play nice with rivals while it reconfigures the way online advertising works, Google provided [2]an update [PDF] on the progress of its [3]Privacy Sandbox – a set of code projects to reconcile targeted advertising with some lax notion of privacy.
[4]
"In Q3 2024, Chrome will phase out support for third-party cookies over a two-month period," Adzilla promised in its report.
[5]
[6]
Previously, Google had intended to toss third-party cookies [7]by the end of 2022 . Then it was [8]by the end of 2023 . As of July, 2022, the target date had been [9]pushed back to the second half of 2024.
Google [10]announced its Privacy Sandbox back in 2019 and the plan has been to replace third-party cookies – which make it easy to track people online and create profiles of online behavior – with something less invasive.
[11]
Technologies being developed include:
the [12]Topics API , for collecting browsing history data to determine the browser user's interests;
the [13]FLEDGE API , for running an on-device ad auction based on the user's interests;
the [14]Attribution Reporting API , for measuring ad clicks;
the [15]Private State Tokens API , for fighting fraud without tracking;
the [16]First Party Sets API , for treating different domains owned by the same company as the same for browser security purposes; and others.
First Party Sets can be activated by setting a feature flag in Chrome 108 or later. Topics, FLEDGE, and the Attribution Reporting APIs are scheduled to be available in the third quarter of 2023.
[17]Home Depot sent my email, details of stuff I bought to Meta, customer complains
[18]Walmart runs creepy 'advergame' on Roblox, where kids can make toy wish lists
[19]Break up Google now, says US govt in ad monopoly lawsuit
[20]Hey, online pharmacies: Quit spreading around everyone's data already
As far as the UK CMA is concerned, Google is complying with its commitments to report on the progress of its Privacy Sandbox proposals and to engage with the online community to address concerns.
In the case of Topics – which the W3C's TAG said [21]gathers data in a way that's opaque and outside user control – Google suggests the alternative is paywalls and spurned advertisers giving users the finger by building digital fingerprints of their browsers to track them regardless of their wishes.
"We believe the benefit to users is that Topics support interest-based ads that keep the web free and open, and we also believe it significantly improves privacy compared to third-party cookies. Removing third-party cookies without viable alternatives may negatively impact publishers, and could lead to [22]worse approaches which are less private, are not transparent, and are not realistically resettable or controlled by users," the search leviathan argued in its filing.
Google maintains many companies are interested in the Topics API and other Privacy Sandbox technologies, and insists that its ad tech tools can advance privacy while supporting an open web.
[23]
As for addressing the specific points raised by the W3C's TAG, Google says it will respond publicly – at some point. In the meantime, it considers the development of Topics more important.
"At this stage, since Google has received questions from the ecosystem about what this review may imply for the development and launch of the Topics API, we would like to reaffirm our plan to make it available in Chrome Stable this year," the ad biz said in its response.
"While Google appreciates the input of the W3C Technical Architecture Group, it considers it of paramount importance to continue the efforts to develop and test Topics in consultation with the CMA and the ecosystem."
The CMA in its [24]update [PDF] on Google's compliance acknowledges the TAG review of Topics and says it's looking into the matter.
"We and the ICO [Information Commissioner's Office] are continuing to consider the potential impacts of the Topics API on privacy as well as market impacts, as set out in the Development and Implementation Criteria in the Commitments," the competition agency reported. ®
Get our [25]Tech Resources
[1] https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/726#issuecomment-1379908459
[2] https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63d7b357e90e0773e17b27d3/Privacy_Sandbox_Progress_Report_to_the_CMA_2022_Q4.pdf
[3] https://privacysandbox.com/
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/devops&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Y9pGUiXLZkTWqLhZSFkJJwAAAFg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/devops&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y9pGUiXLZkTWqLhZSFkJJwAAAFg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/devops&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Y9pGUiXLZkTWqLhZSFkJJwAAAFg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2020/01/14/google_third_party_cookies_user_agent/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/25/google_thirdparty_cookies/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/28/google_postpones_thirdparty_cookie_phaseout
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2019/08/22/google_chrome_privacy_sandbox/
[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/devops&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y9pGUiXLZkTWqLhZSFkJJwAAAFg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[12] https://developer.chrome.com/docs/privacy-sandbox/topics/
[13] https://developer.chrome.com/docs/privacy-sandbox/fledge/
[14] https://developer.chrome.com/docs/privacy-sandbox/attribution-reporting/
[15] https://developer.chrome.com/docs/privacy-sandbox/trust-tokens/
[16] https://developer.chrome.com/docs/privacy-sandbox/first-party-sets/
[17] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/27/home_depot_meta/
[18] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/25/walmarts_advergame_on_roblox_pushes/
[19] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/24/doj_google_ad_monopoly_antitrust/
[20] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/20/online_pharmacies_data_sharing/
[21] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/18/google_topics_api/
[22] https://github.com/mikewest/privacy-budget/issues/6
[23] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/devops&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Y9pGUiXLZkTWqLhZSFkJJwAAAFg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[24] https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63d7b9a88fa8f5188ae8f788/CMA_update_report_-_January_2023__.pdf
[25] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
DJO
The horror!
elsergiovolador
Imaging visiting a car forum looking for what kind of tyres people buy for their whip and then seeing advert of a tyre shop rather than another scam site offering loans just because you were searching for business grants earlier.
Neil Barnes
Even better: our car forum has run for over twenty years with no adverts whatsoever.
You know
Lis
it really pisses me off that advertisers can use my internet connection to send me the equivalent of junk mail. They should be paying me. How is this even legal? They are leeching off my pipe. I wouldn't care so much if the few adverts I see were even distant cousins to my interests.
Fucking parasites.
Re: You know
ChoHag
You connect to the web server. You make the request. The server gives you what you ask for.
Perhaps don't ask?
Re: You know
b0llchit
It is called an ad blocker...
;-)
and add noscript too
Re: You know
jmch
"The server gives you what you ask for."
No, the server gives what you ask for and then independently asks another server to also send you a bunch of stuff you didn't ask for.,
A cookie by any other name
Neil Barnes
would no doubt taste as sweet, but might sneak by a regulator.
Re: A cookie by any other name
Lil Endian
It wouldn't get by Susan Jebb! (Did she get confused between cookie law and the munchies?)
[Icon: She's coming for your cookies!]
Effect
elsergiovolador
If the effect is going to be the same as if there was a cookie, then are regulators dumb?
What is the effect in EU and UK?
Graham Cobb
My (limited) understanding is that the reason I see cookie popups is not because they are cookies, but because tracking my interests requires my explicit agreement. If so, isn't this Google API required to get my permission (which I will refuse) in exactly the same way as cookies do?
Or is there something special about cookies, which Google believe this new API gets around?
Of course, in the UK, I am sure there is some corruption which will mean the government decides to "simplify" the rules making this new API legal. But in non-corrupt countries will this achieve anything for them?
Re: What is the effect in EU and UK?
Dan 55
If it does, I'm sure NOYB will end up bringing a case.
The alternative is advertising content based on the content of the site rather than the visitor.