News: 1674714305

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Microsoft shells out for 2.5GW of solar. Not that it'll make a big dent in its emissions

(2023/01/26)


With just seven years left to achieve its 100 percent renewable energy goals, Microsoft said it would add as much as 2.5 gigawatts of solar power to its operations under a partnership with South Korea's Hanwha Qcells.

Microsoft has a massive energy footprint with more than 200 offices and 60 cloud regions; many of these facilities consume tens of millions of watts of power every hour as the racks of servers churn through petabytes of data.

It's not [1]uncommon for a cloud region to have 50MW or 60MW of capacity. And with hotter, higher wattage CPUs and GPUs beginning to hit the market, power consumption in many of these facilities will no doubt increase, as cloud providers, like Microsoft, transition to higher rack densities.

[2]

Under the agreement [3]announced today, Microsoft said it would work with Qcells to engineer, procure, and construct solar power installations using power purchase agreements. PPAs are a mechanism for companies and institutions to fund renewable or clean energy production within a region. Under these PPAs, customers agree to buy the power generated by these facilities or installations at a set price over the course of a decade or two.

[4]Nuclear-powered datacenter throws open doors to tenants this year

[5]Google and Microsoft add more renewable energy for datacenters

[6]Amazon adds 2.7 gigawatts of renewable energy to its operations

[7]What are server makers really doing to and for the climate?

Microsoft has used PPAs extensively as it has worked to end its reliance on fossil fuels and other nonrenewable energy sources. However, Microsoft's strategy for offsetting its carbon footprint has evolved over the past few years. In 2012, the Windows titan said it purchased enough renewable energy credits (REC) to offset the greenhouse gas emissions generated by its facilities.

But Redmond later moved away from RECs in favor of PPAs. According to Microsoft, PPAs are preferable because RECs can't reliably guarantee the renewable energy is generated on the same grid as where it's consumed.

[8]

[9]

As of last November, the software giant claims it has signed PPAs for more than 10 gigawatts of renewable energy capacity including 900MW of capacity for facilities in Ireland.

While Microsoft's plan to end its reliance on non-renewable energy is commendable, it's worth pointing out only a fraction of the mega-corp's greenhouse gas emissions are attributable to either [10]scope 1 or scope 2 sources. Scope 1 being emissions directly resulting from an organization's operations, and scope 2 being emissions a company indirectly causes by having energy produced for it.

[11]

In other words, only a fraction of its emissions are directly generated by Microsoft facilities and vehicles, or are generated by the utilities that provide power to them.

According to the corporation's latest sustainability report

[12]PDF

, the vast majority of Microsoft's emissions — 13.7 million metric tons of CO2 as of 2021 — are attributable to emissions from the purchase or sale of goods and services, the transportation of those services, and the use of those products over their lifetimes.

While Microsoft says its primary emissions fell 16.9 percent in 2021, the business's overall emissions actually increased almost 23 percent. According to Redmond, this increase was driven by the growth of its cloud services business and a growth in sales. So, it's safe to say the Windows goliath has a long way to go to achieve its goal of going carbon neutral by 2030. ®

Get our [13]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/12/oregon_clean_energy_bill/

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Y9JdTz2E3j9l7rE33mxmsQAAAFg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://news.microsoft.com/2023/01/25/microsoft-and-qcells-announce-strategic-alliance-to-curb-carbon-emissions-and-power-the-clean-energy-economy/

[4] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/19/nuclear_powered_datacenter/

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/24/google_microsoft_renewable_energy/

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2022/09/21/amazon_27gw_renewable_energy/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/18/server_oems_climate/

[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y9JdTz2E3j9l7rE33mxmsQAAAFg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Y9JdTz2E3j9l7rE33mxmsQAAAFg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[10] https://www.nationalgrid.com/stories/energy-explained/what-are-scope-1-2-3-carbon-emissions

[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y9JdTz2E3j9l7rE33mxmsQAAAFg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[12] https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RE4RwfV#page=15

[13] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Hmmm...

lglethal

I'm no Microsoft fan, but attributing the energy use of the user of a software product to the manufacturer sends entirely unreasonable unless the sole purpose of the computer running that software is to run that software - so something like a medical imaging computer whose sole purpose is to run medical scans might be reasonable to attribute to the medical imaging software company, but even then...

Attributing the energy use of all Windows machines implies that without Windows people wouldn't use computers. Which is frankly utter bollocks.

The energy used by my computer is on me, not on the hardware manufacturers, and certainly not on the software writers whose programs I choose to use.

Including the use of their software on their energy report seems a very strange stick to choose to beat themselves with...

Re: Hmmm...

localzuk

If we jump down that rabbit hole, how far do you go? Is Tesco responsible for the energy I use to cook my dinner when I buy the ingredients from them?

Re: Hmmm...

Stuart Castle

Actually, it's no longer as clear cut as saying "The energy used by my computer is on me, not on the hardware manufacturers, and certainly not on the software writers whose programs I choose to use.". A lot of software (certainly most Microsoft software) now has some sort of cloud component, whether they use the cloud to provide limited functionality or the entire application (Office can operate either way). Even the OS increasingly has some components that are hosted remotely, even it it's just update repo servers.

Admittedly, you can still obtain software (both Applications and OSs) that operates entirely offline, but it *is* getting more difficult to do so, especially if at some point, you need to use commercial software, with more and more companies moving toward online activation, updating and even subscriptions. Any company who produces software that relies on access to remote servers for any functionality should be using alternative energy where feasible to do so, and they should be held accountable.

I broadly agree that the software writers should not have responsibility for the energy your computer uses running their software. After all, you could be running a low power office type machine or a laptop that uses a 40W PSU. Or you could be using a high end gaming PC that requires hundreds of watts to even start. That said, there are techniques they can use to minimise the power their applications use (such as limiting the resources used, accessing data in bursts, to allow drives to spin down, and coding efficiently to reduce impact on CPU/GPU etc).

That said, they should be doing that *anyway*..

Dumb idea?

xyz

I live off grid and the biggest PITA is battery capacity... It's never enough, so...

I was thinking and as an example, if it's evening on the east coast USA, it'll be sunny someplace else on the planet, given that the planet rotates. So, why not contractually offset the panels, so that the sunny someplace feeds evening east coast USA and then daytime east coast USA feeds somplace dark. Etc etc. Just an idea.

Re: Dumb idea?

Charlie Clark

What? Are you talking about a national energy grid? As is common in Europe (Portugal to Ukraine, Norway to Greece). Many US states have argued that this is unconstitutional.

Re: Many US states have argued that this is unconstitutional.

Steve Davies 3

Especially Texas.... (sic)

Eh, what???

jmch

" the vast majority of Microsoft's emissions — 13.7 million metric tons of CO2 as of 2021 — are attributable to emissions from the purchase or sale of goods and services, the transportation of those services..."

What goods or services are Microsoft producing and shipping that are nor part of it's core software business?? Are they still selling Zunes in unimaginable quantities??

"... and the use of those products over their lifetimes."

Is that implying that if I run a Microsoft OS on my PC, that someone is counting that emission as Microsoft's? That's pretty insane even by green-nutjob standards!!

Re: Eh, what???

Spazturtle

They are measuring they emissions in a certain way to inflate the number so that in a few years time they can change how they measure it and claim that they have massively cut their emissions.

Shine light upon the Omissions

dogcatcher

Let's just change the headline to omissions; we can then discuss what else Microsoft doesn't do.

MS has gone WOKE

Steve Davies 3

At least certain right wing politicians and Cable News Stations have declared.

MS (bless their cotton socks) issued an update for the X-Box that powers it down if it has been left running but not in use just to save the customer money on their power bills.

Senator Ted (Cancun) Cruze went on Fox News (no surprise there then) and called them 'woke' for doing this. Fox naturally agreed with him.

If the X-Box update got his knickers in such a twist then this should make his head explode.

I'm no MS fan but at least they are trying a little bit here.

old inkjet cartridges emanate barium-based fumes