News: 1671046208

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

TikTok could be banned from America, thanks to proposed bipartisan bill

(2022/12/14)


The US government's crackdown on TikTok continues, with the latest salvo being a bipartisan bill that would outright ban the popular social media app from doing business in the country.

TikTok is owned by Beijing-based ByteDance, which has led it to become a battleground for privacy advocates who argue that it could be used to [1]spy on US citizens . [2]Several US states have already [3]banned the app on government-owned devices, while Indiana has sued TikTok for inflicting harm on residents.

This latest legislation, spearheaded in the [4]Senate by Florida Senator Marco Rubio and in the [5]House by Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL), would "block and prohibit all transactions … of a social media company" with at least one million users, and which is based or under the influence of countries the US considers foreign adversaries.

[6]

The bill

[7]PDF

names TikTok and its parent company ByteDance as particular targets, but not the only ones – any company that meets the criteria would be subject to the bill's restrictions.

Ta-ta, TikTok?

Multiple states have banned TikTok on government devices, while Rubio and Gallagher telegraphed their intentions in November with a joint Washington Post op-ed arguing for a total ban on TikTok in the US.

"In China, no company is truly private. Under the country's 2017 National Intelligence Law, all citizens and businesses are required to assist in intelligence work, which includes sharing data," the pair said in [8]the article .

[9]

[10]

TikTok has denied allegations pertaining to the state-level bans, [11]telling Reuters it was "disappointed that so many states are jumping on the bandwagon to enact policies based on unfounded, politically charged falsehoods about TikTok."

[12]States label TikTok 'a malicious and menacing threat'

[13]Taiwan bans state-owned devices from running Chinese platform TikTok

[14]TikTok NSFW if you work for the South Dakota government

[15]Criminals use trending TikTok challenge to make data-stealing malware invisible

There is at least some truth to the many rumors surrounding TikTok's poor handling of US user data – the company [16]admitted in July that some Chinese-based employees had access to the data of US-based users.

The news came out of the discovery that US TikTok user data was being transmitted overseas to Chinese servers, which TikTok said at the time it would put an end to. Fast-forward to September, and the US government was [17]still in discussions with TikTok to resolve security concerns, and it appears those discussions have [18]slowed to a crawl as the chorus of anti-TikTok voices has grown louder.

TikTok hasn't yet responded to The Register's questions about the new ban bills. Hilary McQuaide, TikTok's global head of communications, [19]told CNN it was "troubling" that members of Congress would push to end the Biden administration's national security review of TikTok and implement a ban "that will do nothing to advance the national security of the United States."

[20]

McQuaide said TikTok was already beginning to implement security plans discussed with the US government, and would report the progress to Congress.

Rubio, unsurprisingly, isn't convinced. "There is no more time to waste on meaningless negotiations with a CCP-puppet company. It is time to ban Beijing-controlled TikTok for good." ®

Get our [21]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/21/tiktok_spying_allegations_bytedance/

[2] https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/30/tiktok_nsfw_if_you_work/

[3] https://www.theregister.com/2022/12/08/texas_bans_indiana_tiktok_lawsuit/

[4] https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/5245?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22rubio%22%2C%22rubio%22%5D%7D&r=2&s=2

[5] https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/9508?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22gallagher%22%2C%22gallagher%22%5D%7D&s=8&r=2

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Y5pVmOMsP90J@qHz4xM4lQAAAJc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[7] https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/1ebac814-157e-4e26-81b9-d9aa3fd96ae3/5861AFCCFDC5254BAFEE5BB2BDA54B32.hey22c36.pdf

[8] https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/11/10/marco-rubio-ban-tiktok-america-china-mike-gallagher/

[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y5pVmOMsP90J@qHz4xM4lQAAAJc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[10] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Y5pVmOMsP90J@qHz4xM4lQAAAJc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[11] https://www.reuters.com/world/us/alabama-utah-become-latest-us-states-ban-tiktok-state-devices-2022-12-13/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2022/12/08/texas_bans_indiana_tiktok_lawsuit/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2022/12/07/taiwan_bans_chinese_platform_tiktok/

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/30/tiktok_nsfw_if_you_work/

[15] https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/29/tiktok_invisible_challenge_malware/

[16] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/02/tiktok_china_us_data/

[17] https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/26/technology/tiktok-national-security-china.html

[18] https://www.wsj.com/articles/tiktok-national-security-deal-faces-more-delays-as-worry-grows-over-risks-11670342800?mod=hp_lead_pos6&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=12/7/22%20%20Punchbowl%20News%20AM&utm_term=Punchbowl%20AM%20and%20Active%20Subscribers%20from%20Memberful%20Combined

[19] https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/13/tech/tiktok-ban-bill/index.html

[20] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y5pVmOMsP90J@qHz4xM4lQAAAJc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[21] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



heyrick

" In China, no company is truly private. Under the country's 2017 National Intelligence Law, all citizens and businesses are required to assist in intelligence work, which includes sharing data, "

"In the United States, no company is truly private. Under the country's 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (and Executive Orders 12333 (1981), 13355 (2005), and 13470 (2008)), all businesses are required to assist in intelligence work, which includes sharing data,"

nintendoeats

Which is why GDPR is such a problem for American companies...but even if they both do the bad thing, doesn't mean it isn't a bad thing. And while I can absolutely blame the Americans for spying on their own people, I can't blame them for wanting to prevent another country from doing so.

Apples and Oranges

Anonymous Coward

Under the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, there needs to be a warrant, probable cause, a time limit, and all unrelated records must be destroyed. Under China's law compliance is mandatory and continuous with no cause needed and cooperation must be unrestricted. Resistance is Futile.

Also, the U.S. law prohibits surveillance based solely on First Amendment activities - in other words, it's illegal for the gummint to implement surveillance because they don't like what you say. China has demonstrated that they will proactively implement surveillance only because they don't like what you say.

If you fail to comply with the USA law you are charged with a crime and then you go to trial. China has no such protections.

Where China leads...

IGotOut

....the US follows.

Not going to happen with this proposal.

thejoelr

Everyone hates Rubio and he does lots of things just for publicity. This has zero chance.

Re: Not going to happen with this proposal.

martinusher

McCarthy wasn't exactly leading the popularity contests in the 50s but he found that one button to press...

Re: Not going to happen with this proposal.

Anonymous Coward

RubioBot is not handcuffed by Asimov's laws of robotics. His prime directive it to play the role of a useful idiot for the Billionaire class.

mark l 2

I wonder how much money Zuckerberg has thrown in to lobby to get Tiktok banned in the US? A large proportion of the young people are moving from Facebook and Instagram to Tiktok, so Meta would be the ones to gain the most if Tiktok does get banned in the US bring users back to their apps.

You are taking yourself far too seriously.