News: 1670524213

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Europe's USB-C deadline: Lightning must be struck from iPhone by December, 2024

(2022/12/08)


OEMs, start your assembly lines as the European Commission (EC) has published its USB-C rules, and an official date for enforcement has been set for December 28, 2024.

When [1]the law comes into effect, any newly made radio equipment that can be charged with a wire, from smartphones and tablets to earbuds, mice and keyboards, will have to contain a USB-C port instead of an old micro USB port or one of Apple's Lightning ports.

The only exception to the law now on the books are laptops, which are being given until April 28, 2026, to comply with the rule. Devices that only charge wirelessly, like smartwatches, are exempt from the USB-C port requirements.

[2]

The EC first informed the world of its plans in [3]June of this year, when it said it had agreed to add a single-charging solution to planned Radio Equipment Directive amendments.

[4]

[5]

It justified the proposed change by saying it would reduce electronic waste and simplify device charging for consumers. Beyond requiring manufacturers to simplify their cable landscape, the European Parliament said the standard would also eliminate confusing and variable fast-charging speeds, as all USB-C cables delivered with equipment would be required to offer 100 watts of power delivery.

Apple is the largest smartphone manufacturer to have resisted the adoption of USB-C, at least in some of its devices – the current generation of iPads have all ditched Lightning for USB-C. When talk of a planned single-charging standard in the European Union was raised again in late 2021, Apple was [6]predictably against the move.

[7]

At the time, Apple said it was concerned that a single charging standard would stifle innovation, thereby harming consumers. Fast-forward to this past October when the USB-C law was signed, and Apple changed its tune, saying that it [8]intended to conform with the EU's USB-C requirements.

Maltese MP Alex Agius Saliba said in June: "This is a rule which will apply to everyone. Now it's [not just a] Memorandum of Understanding [anymore] and having all the leeway that [Apple] had during the past 10 years – basically to not abide by this MoU – which was abided by the majority of manufacturers. So yes, Apple has to abide."

Apple's argument that adopting USB-C would stifle innovation simply doesn't hold much water, especially if Lightning ports are the alternative. Lightning can't offer the data transfer [9]speeds that USB-C is capable of, it doesn't support USB 3.1 gen 2, and it's capped to just 14W of power delivery - all factors in USB-C's favor.

[10]One-size-fits-all chargers? What a great idea! Of course Apple would hate it

[11]Apple exec confirms iPhones will switch to USB-C because 'we have no choice'

[12]EU makes USB-C common charging port for most electronic devices

[13]Return of the Mac (mechanical): Vissles keyboard for fans of keeping a low profile

[14]The vote on the proposal - 602 in favor, 13 against and 8 abstentions – may have also motivated Apple to realize it would have to leave the EU's single market before it got its way.

With Apple's typical release cycle of unveiling new iPhones in the fall, Apple will technically have a bit more time than December 2024 to get USB-C in its new devices. Apple has reportedly been testing USB-C in iPhones since [15]earlier this year , meaning its possible USB-C iPhones could appear before the deadline.

[16]

Apple refused to comment. ®

Get our [17]Tech Resources



[1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32022L2380&pk_campaign=todays_OJ&pk_source=EURLEX&pk_medium=TW&pk_keyword=Common%20charger&pk_content=Directive

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Y5Jsj4PmE@Hu0hkvQBxs6gAAAM8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/07/eu_usb_c_common_charger/

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y5Jsj4PmE@Hu0hkvQBxs6gAAAM8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Y5Jsj4PmE@Hu0hkvQBxs6gAAAM8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/23/eu_one_charger_plan/

[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y5Jsj4PmE@Hu0hkvQBxs6gAAAM8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/27/apple_usbc/

[9] https://www.thestreet.com/investing/lightning-vs-usb-c-is-the-switch-worth-it#:~:text=Lightning%20ports%20support%20USB%202.0,the%20copper%20pins%20are%20exposed.

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/23/eu_one_charger_plan/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/27/apple_usbc/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/07/eu_usb_c_common_charger/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2021/12/13/vissles_lp85_keyboard/

[14] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20220930IPR41928/long-awaited-common-charger-for-mobile-devices-will-be-a-reality-in-2024

[15] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-05-13/apple-plans-to-change-iphone-charging-port-to-meet-new-eu-law?sref=ExbtjcSG

[16] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Y5Jsj4PmE@Hu0hkvQBxs6gAAAM8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[17] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Anonymous Coward

Is there a way to see how members voted?

Ireland's would be very interesting, and I reckon it would be against / abstain ...

Anonymous Coward

I didn't check in detail but can't you infd the voting results somewhere like https://www.europarl.europa.eu/plenary/en/votes.html?tab=votes ?

But don't forget that the Council of Ministers will also have had to agree to this.

graeme leggett

These are the opposition and abstaining votes (grouped by party grouping and then MEP surname. All old-fashioned Irish names

Against

ECR Hoogeveen, Vondra, Vrecionová, Weimers

NI: Kolakušić

PPE: Kokalari, Lega, Polfjärd, Skyttedal, Tobé, Warborn, Weiss

Renew: Al-Sahlani

Abstain

ECR: Ilčić, Jurzyca, Zahradil

ID: Haider, Kofod, Mayer, Vilimsky

PPE: Herbs

(edit added note on group)

European Conservatives and Reformists - these are the more eurosceptic anti-federalist bunch initiated by David Cameron in 2006-09 so you'd expect them to be a bit anti the measure.

Anonymous Coward

... as all USB-C cables delivered with equipment would be required to offer 100 watts of power delivery.

No, thank you, My current batch of 5V devices can't take 20 amps.

Anonymous Coward

USB-C providing 100W does so at 20v (5A). I believe upcoming versions might move to 48v (so a smidge over 2A).

A 100W charger doesn't provide 100w all the time. If a device needs 5v@2A, it'll provide 5v@2A. If it needs 5v@500mA it'll provide 5v@500mA. The "100W" rating is the highest constant load that can be drawn in normal operating conditions.

So don't worry, plugging a 5v-only USB Flash Drive into a 100W-capable USB-C system won't cause the Flash Drive to draw 20A and burst into flames.

elsergiovolador

Does it mean more metal has to be used to manufacture the cable?

It seems wild to be forced to buy 100W cable if you only need it to carry 10W for your device.

C R Mudgeon

Does that adaptability apply to chargers and/or chargees (i.e. downstream devices) that are connected via adapters to other sorts of USB ports, or only to ones that are natively USB C?

doublelayer

It depends what chain of adapters you've got, but either it will all support the PD signals and negotiate voltage, or some link will not support them and it will be restricted to 5V with the maximum power output determined by the source device and the actual used current determined by physics. An adapter can prevent charging if it doesn't support it, but it can't choose to overvolt unless someone's deliberately made it to ignore the standard (in which case that's a problem you could have with anything).

100w is not at 5v

Piro

20a would be mental through a usb port/cable. 100w is only delivered at 20v, as far as I recall

EU market size.

TonyJewell

And that's the influence of a large Trading Bloc. Something the UK can only dream of now.

Re: EU market size.

ElRegioLPL

The irony of this being Apple won't want to waste time & money shipping a different type to the UK so we'll probably end up with it anyway. They're probably thinking the UK will get forced to be 'in line' by the EU to keep trading as well.

This is what happens when you try trading with someone 10000x more powerful than you... "we have all the cards" etc etc (poo emoji)

Re: EU market size.

elsergiovolador

EU gets brown envelopes from cable manufacturers and mining companies (you need to get that extra metal to have the cable to run safely that 100W)

Gee, wish we were in the EU so our MEPs could get brown envelopes too!

It's funny that when it comes to mass surveillance and other anti-freedom measures the EU is cooking up, the EU brigade stays silent...

Re: EU market size.

johnfbw

Almost every device I buy comes with a cable, I have hundreds of them lying around. As soon as this regulation comes in no-one will be providing a cable that is used in everything else.

Why would metal manufacturers put money in brown envelopes to make 20% extra off every cable, but sell 5 times less?

Site radios?

the spectacularly refined chap

I have looked at the first few paragraphs of the linked law but not gone through it in full. How is "radio equipment" defined? The example that comes to mind is site radios used by construction workers and kitchen fitters everywhere. If you don't know what I mean they're typically made by DeWalt, Makita, Bosch et al and use the same style of rechargeable batteries the same brand's cordless drill, circular saw etc use. Some of them can alternatively be plugged in and used as chargers for those same batteries. Are they caught up by this? Demanding USB charging on those seems superfluous at best.

Alternatively what about temporary cellular base stations for events or emergency/failure use? I would imagine most of the larger ones would be mains or diesel generator powered, but surely there are smaller battery units out there?

Re: Site radios?

Anonymous Coward

Roll on common battery tool connector and interchangeable batteries.

(I should live so long)

Re: Site radios?

graeme leggett

Site radios do not appear to be in the categories the directive applies to viz:

1.1 handheld mobile phones;

1.2. tablets;

1.3. digital cameras;

1.4. headphones;

1.5. headsets;

1.6. handheld videogame consoles

1.7. portable speakers

1.8. e-readers;

1.9. keyboards;

1.10. mice;

1.11. portable navigation systems;

1.12. earbuds;

1.13. laptops.

Re: Site radios?

the spectacularly refined chap

Cheers.

Re: Site radios?

johnfbw

100W is a fair chunk of power, allowing them to be charged by USB might not be the most useful if you have the charger handy, but if you a DeWalt and everyone on site has a Makita you would be really happy to be able to use your mobile phone's charger!

***

I wrote that - then turned to google. DeWalt and Ryobi agree with me!

https://www.xda-developers.com/usb-type-c-power-tools/

Re: Site radios?

Vulch

I believe it only applies to devices where the battery is normally (or has to be as it's not removeable) charged while in the equipment, professional level power tool batteries are usually removed for charging so will be able to use their standard charging stations.

Things are more like they used to be than they are now.