Waiting for speedy broadband? UK's Openreach prioritizing existing work over fiber expansion
- Reference: 1669207444
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2022/11/23/openreach_fiber_expansion/
- Source link:
Following government pledges to roll out [1]full-fiber broadband access to all areas of the country by 2025 , Openreach and other network service providers have been investing in new infrastructure across the UK over the past several years.
However, a report in the [2]Financial Times has claimed that Openreach is now limiting its investment in fiber to curb costs. This appears to be based on a letter the company sent out to its suppliers informing them that Openreach intends to tighten investment to a just-in-time approach, and would not be committing capital to projects further than six months out, according to the FT.
[3]
We asked Openreach for its response, and the company denied that it was cutting back on investment in its fiber broadband rollout.
[4]
[5]
"We expect to build ultrafast full fiber broadband to more homes and businesses next year, not fewer, so we're speeding up not slowing down," a spokesperson told us.
So which is correct? Is Openreach cutting back on fiber expansion or not?
[6]
Well, it depends on how you look at it. A spokesperson at Openreach's parent company BT told us the plan is to prioritize investment in those areas where network buildout has already begun, rather than on starting on new builds in new areas.
So while it may be true to say that Openreach is continuing to invest in expanding its fiber network in the exchange areas it has already started building in, it is also true that it may put a halt on expanding into areas where it does not currently have fiber infrastructure – at least not for now.
[7]Network operator Vorboss offers 100 gigabit connectivity – but only in central London
[8]BT re-enters pay talks to prevent further strikes, says union
[9]UK comms regulator rings death knell for fax machines
[10]Consolidation looms for UK broadband providers
In its results for the six months to the end of September, BT Group said that its FTTP build had "passed 8.8 million premises, including 2.8 million in rural areas" with initial build under way on a further 6 million premises. It is these 6 million premises where Openreach is expected to focus its efforts for the near future.
"As our recent results show, we're investing £200 million [$238 million] more than we expected to this year on the build, and orders for Full Fiber services are at record levels," the spokesperson claimed.
"In fact, 9 million homes and businesses can already order our Full Fiber service from a large range of service providers, so it makes sense for us to put more resources into upgrading customers and fulfilling orders as quickly and smoothly as possible. We've also partially built the new network to a further six million premises, so we're focused on completing that work," Openreach added.
[11]
But BT Group is determined to cut costs amid the worsening economic outlook as CEO Philip Jansen detailed when the company announced its results earlier this month.
As we [12]reported , Jansen said that BT Group is upping cost savings targets "from £2.5 billion to £3 billion by the end of FY25."
At the same time, BT has been stuck in a damaging industrial dispute with staff over pay that has seen 26,000 Openreach engineers and call center personnel walk out on eight separate occasions, taking its toll on the organization's business operations.
The company [13]announced earlier this month that the UK government's price cap on energy bills could give it the financial "wiggle room" to offer more money to staff and bring an end to the dispute. ®
Get our [14]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2020/10/16/national_audit_office/
[2] https://www.ft.com/content/9da0a07c-e1ad-4c96-9fd2-dc926bc505fd
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Y35RpmOi4ULOgwxZS8sgtgAAANI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y35RpmOi4ULOgwxZS8sgtgAAANI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Y35RpmOi4ULOgwxZS8sgtgAAANI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y35RpmOi4ULOgwxZS8sgtgAAANI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/18/vorboss_offers_100gbps_connectivity/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/04/bt_pay_talks_reopened_says_cwu/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/02/ofcom_fax_death_knell/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2022/09/27/uk_broadband_consolidation/
[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Y35RpmOi4ULOgwxZS8sgtgAAANI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/03/bt_cost_cutting/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/11/bt_inflation_pay_award_strikes/
[14] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
It would have been in everyone's long-term interests if this was a problem that didn't exist because it had been thought about a long time ago. Which it was. It was understood that fibre would be the future in 1979 (see [1]the comments by Dr Peter Cochrane on p. 135 here ). [2]Then, a certain Prime Minister blocked the nationwide roll-out of fibre by BT a full 32 years ago , citing the need for competition and market forces. Fascinatingly, [3]this 1994 episode of Tomorrow's World turned out to be rather prescient: I would not have expected it to age quite so well.
[1] https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/lords-committees/communications-and-digital/Superfastbroadband/SuperfastBroadbandEvidence.pdf
[2] https://www.techradar.com/news/world-of-tech/how-the-uk-lost-the-broadband-race-in-1990-1224784
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpZ5STahhPE
Let utility companies do the work when they dig anyway
They shouldn't pay the cable just put it in the ground, just put the cable in the ground when they dig anyway. Then, after some years, it is ready when a fiber company wants to connect to a home.
They had a nifty machine ..
For doing it out here in Spain. It just drove along and cut a narrow trench (7cms or so) in the tarmac at the side of the road. Blokes laid the fibre (note F I B R E) and filled trench in. Blue line painted on top. I think they were laying over 2kms a day. For other areas they just ran it in big gas supply pipes and the like. Every tiny weeny village now has full fat fibre internet.
Re: They had a nifty machine ..
(note F I B R E)
Upvote for pointing this nonsense out.
This is a British story, of interest mainly to British readers and presumably written by a British reporter.
This attempt at homogenising the site to US standards is starting to irritate me. It's jarring and unnecessary and judging by comments here it is not just me being put off by these changes.
Re: They had a nifty machine ..
Yup - it annoys me as well.
Re: They had a nifty machine ..
And me.
We don't need another American tech mag. There are already several of them.
Re: They had a nifty machine ..
Have you seen the pictures of what happens to fibre when it is laid in micro trenches? After Google finished in some cities in the US they were literally tripping over the stuff in the street.
Whol rollout is broken
My estate of around 100 houses, runs off a main road. Fibre got rolled out to the entire village via that main road, but they didn't trunk off to the right into ours. If they had done, they'd have effectively completed the entire village and job done. Now, at some point, they will have to bring all the machinery and labour back, rebreak ground, tap back in to the conduits etc, when it could've been done at the time.
I do love my 18mbs. :(
Re: Whol rollout is broken
"I do love my 18mbs. :("
Cries in 10mbs...
Cabinet
Does this mean that my Openreach cabinet might get upgraded from standard ADSL to fibre? Been waiting 12 years for that now...
Re: Cabinet
They did that with ours and my transfer rates leapt from 8Mbit/s to... 13. Like, wow. No ETA for FTTP in these parts, so it looks like another decade or two of hyper-super-megafast 13Mbit DSL for me. Yay. :|
See me after class
It's FIBRE, it's spelled that way in the press release, so stick to it.
The whole FTTP strategy (yeah, I know) confuses me. I live in a small, rural market town of about 10,000 people, which only got FTTC a couple of years back, so I hadn't even thought anything about FTTP until Freedom Fibre, an altnet, announced it was putting in infrastructure by the end of this year. Yay! Then suddenly out of the blue, a couple of months back Openreach invaded the town and flood-wired it with fibre. Openreach is now available to order by ISPs, and FF are just finishing off (although I guess having to re-install a lot of the cable where they used 16-feed instead of 48-feed might have delayed things), but by the end of the year we're going to have two separate sets of FTTP infrastructure serving the town.
I'm not complaining by any means, I'm just (a) surprised that we're getting FTTP, and (b) confused as to why we're getting it twice! Surely where an altnet is building out infrastructure, Openreach should be looking elsewhere?
Costing to fix the copper
Voneus turned up in the village of Gamlingay in South Cambridgeshire (where a friend of mine lives) and started making a mess installing more ugly poles to join the existing Openreach poles, then they started digging up roads and verges to lay their fibre interconnects. A village meeting was called to ask who the hell invited them to make a mess - seeing as Openreach have the village marked for FTTP roll-out, and to highlight that those in other areas with underground services did not want ugly poles suddenly sprouting up. Openreach have had to follow the Voneus contractors around the village fixing their damage. Lots of people have had their POTS line damaged or completely broken. The upshot of that is that my friend's VDSL is now rock solid as the flaky connections damaged by Voneus have been repaired.
Fibre Optic was invented and patented in the UK, so the correct spelling is FIBRE! And yes, the shift to "International English" is exceedingly annoying!!
> the plan is to prioritize investment in those areas where network buildout has already begun, rather than on starting on new builds in new areas.
Given the upfront infrastructure costs, undertaking works that have the potential to more quickly load that infrastructure up with paying subscribers, makes sound business sense.
Also it is probably in BT's long-term interests (wrt Ofcom et al) to have some areas where there is an opportunity for third-parties to deploy first.