NASA reassigns Venus boffins to save short-staffed asteroid interceptor
- Reference: 1667906109
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2022/11/08/nasa_psyche_failure/
- Source link:
The plan to send an orbital spacecraft to 16 Psyche – the largest Type-M asteroid yet found, which is located between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter – was [1]canned after NASA failed to deliver the flight software and testing equipment on time. Engineers would not have sufficient time to test the spacecraft in time to make the launch window by October 11, so NASA has kicked it back to October 2023 at the earliest.
An independent review board, commissioned by NASA and its Jet Propulsion Laboratory unit, investigated why the $985 million mission was delayed. The report [2][PDF] is publicly available and recommends the space agency hire more staff to work on the project. The board blamed the delay on "institutional issues" at JPL caused by post-pandemic working conditions, which have allowed employees to work from home more.
[3]
NASA said it has since pulled more employees to work on the Psyche mission – including hiring more leaders as well as a project chief engineer, guidance navigation, and control cognizant engineers. Officials also agreed to get workers together in-person more in the office to encourage them to communicate.
[4]
[5]
Top management at JPL must also organize meetings more regularly for the project and figure out its priorities and status, including developing metrics and targets to meet for tracking progress, the report suggests.
Staff recruited for the Psyche mission have been pulled from the space agency's Venus Emissivity, Radio Science, InSAR, Topography, and Spectroscopy (VERITAS) mission initially scheduled to launch in December 2027. VERITAS is now expected to be delayed by three years at least, and will not launch earlier than 2031.
[6]
"We welcome this opportunity to hear the independent review board's findings and have a chance to address the concerns," Thomas Zurbuchen, associate administrator of NASA's Science Mission Directorate in Washington, [7]said in a statement.
"It's our job to notice issues early – this report is essentially a canary in the coal mine – and address them. Information like this helps us for more than just Psyche, but also for upcoming key missions such as Europa Clipper and Mars Sample Return."
[8]NASA's Psyche mission: 2022 launch is off after software arrives late
[9]NASA wheels SLS rocket out to the launchpad for another attempt to get off the ground
[10]Moon has been drifting away from Earth for 2.4 billion years, rocks reveal
[11]Two Scotts among volunteers helping NASA to track Artemis mission
The 16 Psyche asteroid was chosen for its unique features. With a diameter measuring 226 kilometers (140 miles), it ranks among the dozen most massive space rocks in the Solar System. Its mass is on the order of 10 19 kilograms, making it a bit lighter than dwarf planet Ceres or Saturn's moon Enceladus.
16 Psyche's size and mass aren't its only interesting features. The asteroid is made up of nickel and iron – leading some astronomers to speculate that it may be a chunk of the metallic core of a failed protoplanet. Observing 16 Psyche could give scientists a better understanding of how planets like Earth successfully formed billions of years ago – and why others failed. ®
Get our [12]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/27/psyche_delay/
[2] https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/psyche_irb_report_and_response_nov_2022.pdf
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Y2qLLPUq6tsyCqGTWIU@sQAAAAg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y2qLLPUq6tsyCqGTWIU@sQAAAAg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Y2qLLPUq6tsyCqGTWIU@sQAAAAg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y2qLLPUq6tsyCqGTWIU@sQAAAAg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/as-psyche-mission-moves-forward-nasa-responds-to-independent-review
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/27/psyche_delay/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/03/nasa_artemis_launch/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/18/earth_rocks_uncover_ancient_moondrifts/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/01/artemis_volunteers/
[12] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: metallic core of a failed protoplanet
Me too. I don't think planet formation starts by aggregating a core and then layering on the other stuff. As far as my limited understanding goes, the core forms when enough material has stuck together and remained hot enough for the heavy bits to sink into the middle.
Re: metallic core of a failed protoplanet
I think it starts off as a loose agglomeration where the heavier material migrates to the center before it compresses into a more solid lump.
If while still loose it gets too close to something big like Jupiter it risks being ripped into bits again - this is pretty much how the asteroid belt was formed - anything growing too big gets torn apart by Jupiter. Collisions are rare in the asteroid belt, unlike the impression from games or Hollywood the asteroid belt is not a seething mess of 3D billiards, the average distance between rocks is greater than the Earth Moon seperation.
Re: metallic core of a failed protoplanet
Basically yes. Most simulations of Solar System formation have several largish (up to the size of the Moon) bodies forming in the asterid belt and either colliding with each other or being ejected following close misses with each other and Jupiter. The asteroids we see there now are the debris left over from the collisions.
Is this Dilbert?
"NASA said it has since pulled more employees to work on the Psyche mission – including hiring more leaders..."
"Top management at JPL must also organize meetings more regularly"
Yeah, that should do it!
Re: Is this Dilbert?
I guess the idea is that NASA would find out about problems faster? But no, the direct effect of adding more management and meetings is hardly going to speed up work.
Re: Is this Dilbert?
At least management has admitted that the current team was unable to deliver the software on time, and postponed the project rather than promising to get something together in time and then discovering that it doesn't work properly (like quite a few projects most Reg readers could mention, I expect). After all this really is 'Rocket Science', nice to see some honesty from managers.
So, umm, best wishes for 2023.
Ah yes, more meetings, that's the way to make a project go faster!
Nope.
== Bring us Dabbsy back! ==
metallic core of a failed protoplanet
I am not an astrophysicist... but I do rather wonder how such a thing failed. To have got as far as having a core, it must have been a fairly large mass; a planet or planetoid in its own right? Do they thing something smacked into it and blew it to bits in the finest Star Wars fashion.
Educate me?