The world was promised 'cloud magic'. So much for that fairy tale
- Reference: 1667399407
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2022/11/02/cloud_magic_era_ends/
- Source link:
I did for a moment a couple of weeks ago when I saw what appeared to be a brilliant demo of drag-and-drop hybrid cloud storage management: from a screen that depicted on-prem and cloud volumes, a couple of clicks and a tug on the mouse shifted petabytes into a cloud, associated the data with applications in both environments, and ported security policy for good measure.
I then asked the inventors of this wonder whether the user moving the data was offered any information about the costs that were just incurred.
[1]
The answer: "No. We'll add that soon."
[2]
[3]
This, and for that matter, any vendor can get away with such pathetic responses because for years we've been told that moving to clouds and adopting elasticity and opex will change everything for the better.
Nevermind that this vendor has bet its future on providing cloudy storage software instead of physical appliances, so the only costs it cares about is what you'll pay to license its code. The pervasive narrative of cloud magic means details don't matter.
[4]
Yet the truth has always been that cloud – like any other source of compute and storage resources – tends to sprawl, can be mismanaged, or can fail to deliver on its promise.
Last week, AWS and Microsoft admitted that their customers have realized their cloud costs are out of control. Some of Microsoft's customers may even be ready to walk because the software giant [5]admitted that helping them to control costs will enhance long-term loyalty. AWS [6]blamed a slowdown in growth on customers wanting to get out of commitment to cloudy resources.
Each cloud's admission was made in the context of a quarterly earnings announcement. That makes the confessions all the more important because they represent disclosures to investors that customers have changed behavior in ways likely to have material impact on financial performance.
[7]
Officers of listed companies don't casually toss out mentions of potentially revenue-lowering behavior by their customers. Indeed, they're required to reveal that sort of thing so that investors are informed about future prospects.
AWS and Microsoft have therefore informed investors that cloud users are holding their providers to account for letting costs blow out.
Which is exactly what cloud promised it would not deliver. Remember when Microsoft [8]painted itself as the white knight that could save database users from the need for vast and expensive overprovisioning?
[9]Dropbox admits 130 of its private GitHub repos were copied after phishing attack
[10]Big backlogs, cloud cash shield server makers from economic turmoil – for now
[11]Oracle and Huawei clouds the big movers on Gartner's conjured quadrilateral
[12]Economic headwinds be damned, cloud migrations 'not stopping'
Clearly users have figured out that clouds have often taken them for a ride.
I was recently told the tale of a massive cloud repatriation effort, made necessary by a combination of flaky performance and a top two cloud's indifference to finding a fix. The server vendor that picked up an order for 400 boxes displayed an attitude the customer finds very pleasingly different.
A systems architect of my acquaintance also tells me that customers he encounters are nearly always stunned by just how much compute power and storage capacity he can fit into half a rack, and they happily sign up for it on old-school terms because the savings compared to cloud are colossal. Some of the rigs he recommends don't even need a formal datacenter. A couple of well-ventilated cabinets and careful attention to resilient energy and comms connections can suffice. Once orgs do the numbers, their cloud ambitions blow away.
A few vendors are having another try at making cloud optimization pervasive. I'm hearing talk of "smart clouds" and "superclouds."
But clouds are still trying to perpetuate the magical myth. I recently encountered AWS ads screened during a prime-time reality show that show a family happily benefiting from a number of businesses that use the Amazonian cloud, and a cutely precocious child doing likewise.
The ads are really about seeking social license for cloud computing by making it mainstream, relatable, essential – but not only for nerds – and just a little bit magical.
Actual cloud customers now know that cloud magic is just a story. And increasingly, not one with a happy ending. ®
Get our [13]Tech Resources
[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/paasiaas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Y2KiLwEd1Q5ix1lK-w1PvAAAANg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/paasiaas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y2KiLwEd1Q5ix1lK-w1PvAAAANg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/paasiaas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Y2KiLwEd1Q5ix1lK-w1PvAAAANg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/paasiaas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y2KiLwEd1Q5ix1lK-w1PvAAAANg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/26/microsoft_q1_2023/
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/28/aws_q3_2022/
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/paasiaas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Y2KiLwEd1Q5ix1lK-w1PvAAAANg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2022/03/07/oracle_cloud_migration_microsoft_advice/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/01/dropbox_phishing_code_leak/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/01/datacenter_server_backlog_supply_cloud/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/01/gartner_cloud_magic_quadrant_2022/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/31/rain_wind_or_global_recession/
[13] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Are you saying ....
Quelle Surprise
been saying it for years
anonymous - because I"m looking for a new contract at the moment :o)
Cloud is the biggest piece of overpriced shit in a LONG time & in IT; thats saying something.
MS, Amazon are promising WAY past what they can deliver, and TRY to get performance stats of any of them to actually hold up to their SLA's. Oh you wanted the uptime we promised & you're NOT willing to wait the 4 hours during your busiest trading period while we wait for one of our Indian call centres to call you back? oh sure.
Apart from the hidden costs (oops a developer uploaded a few TB of data the wrong way, here's a £100K bill in transfer fees) you have ZERO control of the quality of support or the engineers looking after your business. Now, a CIO might happily sign off that risk because he/she is going to bugger of in a couple of years before anyone notices they sold a crock of shit to the firm, but if you're a perm engineer, YOU are going to be left holding the bag at 4am trying to get hold of support. and trying to figure out why your business has gone down because the Vendor didn't mention their datacenter is having some maintenance downtime or forgot to buy enough diesel for an outage.
4 years ago I was talking to a couple of guy from a major outsourcer at a training course for Synergy and they were saying most of their work was migrating back OUT of the Cloud because of costs.
even if you ignore the costs, the loss of control of giving the existence of your business to Microsoft or Amazon is a risk too far
Re: been saying it for years
Same here. Was always going to be the case and we are paying eye watering monthly costs which make the old on-premise fixed budget cycle now seem tiny. Was sold the bollocks, the managers bought the bollocks "why aren't we in the cloud" now we have a monthly 80k bill running just a few applications poorly.
So if I have got this right:
1. Companies are annoyed at paying fixed server running costs regardless of usage so they move to the cloud.
2. As more companies more to the cloud the available servers goes down.
3. Companies sign commitment contracts guaranteeing them to a fixed number of servers.
4. Economy has a downturn and usage drops, but due to the commitment contracts they are stuck paying for severs that they are not using
So are they not just back in their starting position but now with added overhead?
18 months ago I crunched the numbers for full infrastructure upgrade where I work. Over 5 years the costs came out at over £500k more for cloud, not counting any expansion.
But bosses had heard that cloud was going to save the world.......
So we have a "Enterprise Cloud Solution" - our kit in a datacentre
The Cloud
The cause of, and solution to, all of your business issues.
Pay a third party to manage your core contact with your clients along with infrastructure and backups. Then be amazed as on-prem options are discontinued. Finally, once all your info is stuck in the briar rabbit datacenters, the monthly fees begin climbing. Shareholders need to see improved profits quarter after quarter. Not your shareholders, the Cloud providers'. Their Christmas Party Fund will be topped up nicely.
Be of no doubt. The next step is to replace the on-prem IT staff with cheaper (monthly fee based) Cloud support staff. Why have pesky independent IT staff looking after your infrastructure? All they do is ask embarrassing questions and highlight flaws. You need marketing department approved 24/7 support from Mumbai that only takes five times longer to get a ticket escalated. No complaints about overtime, no training expenses, no HR worries. Just a flat monthly fee for all your IT support needs. The accountants will love it.
They'll appreciate us only when when we're gone. Then freak out at the expenses when they try to rebuild on-prem.
Re: The Cloud
" The next step is to replace the on-prem IT staff with cheaper (monthly fee based) Cloud based people "
Some years back, a public body client transferred its IT provisioning to a third party data centre, including transferring its IT staff to that third party. Not surprisingly, they couldn't get the same level of service that had when it was in house, but it seemed cheaper (opex wise) at the time. I didn't stay long enough to see how it panned out long term, but I guess it got more expensive eventually. So the problem doesn't always have to be "cloud" - just outsourcing to profit-making third parties.
I know it's been said before - "Your data on someone else's computer! My data, my disks!"
Are you saying ....
.... that the Emperor has no clothes?!?
I've been telling people that for the last decade, but nobody seemed to believe me!