News: 1666783813

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Martian microbes could survive up to 280 million years buried underground

(2022/10/26)


Ancient microbes on Mars could survive up to 280 million years if they are resistant to radiation and left buried underneath the ground in frozen, moist conditions, according to a study published on Tuesday.

Mars is a difficult planet to survive. Lacking a magnetic field and an atmosphere, it cannot shield its surface from harsh cosmic radiation or prevent liquid water evaporating from its surface. If Mars did harbor life in the past, it would be nothing short of a miracle for astronauts to discover live samples. The best chance of finding these hypothetical microbes would be to look below the planet's surface.

Buried beneath the Martian regolith, these alien microorganisms are protected from radiation and could lie dormant and survive for hundreds of millions of years if they are anything like Deinococcus radiodurans , one of the hardiest species of bacteria found on Earth. Nicknamed "Conan the Bacterium," the microbe is particularly resistant to radiation and can survive with little oxygen under cold, dry temperatures.

[1]

A sample of Deinococcus radiodurans, a species known as Conan the Bacterium. Image Credit: Michael Daly/USU

A team of scientists performed radiation experiments on six different types of frozen bacteria and fungi, zapping the samples with gamma rays to mimic conditions on Mars. They discovered Conan the Bacterium could withstand 140,000 grays of radiation, an amount 28,000 times more than the lethal dose for a human. If the bacterium lurks just ten centimeters below the surface, it could survive up to 1.5 million years and if it is pushed down to ten meters, it could survive up to 280 million years, the researchers estimated. The results were [2]published in the Astrobiology journal.

Other environmental constraints like moisture are also required to keep microbes alive. Liquid water is believed to have disappeared from Mars billions of years ago. Other processes like meteorite impacts could melt water ice in its soil to keep the cells hydrated, explained Michael Daly, a professor of pathology at Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USU), who led the study.

[3]Mars rover Curiosity reaches sulfate-rich Mount Sharp after 10-year journey

[4]Self-imposed climate change may have killed Martian life

[5]Japan tests probe to land on Martian moon Phobos, bring a chunk of it back to Earth

[6]Astroboffins present fresh evidence of moving liquid water on Mars

"Although D. radiodurans buried in the Martian subsurface could not survive dormant for the estimated 2 to 2.5 billion years since flowing water disappeared on Mars, such Martian environments are regularly altered and melted by meteorite impacts," he [7]said in a statement.

"We suggest that periodic melting could allow intermittent repopulation and dispersal. Also, if Martian life ever existed, even if viable lifeforms are not now present on Mars, their macromolecules and viruses would survive much, much longer. That strengthens the probability that, if life ever evolved on Mars, this will be revealed in future missions."

[8]

The study's results, however, also show that if astronauts or spacecraft were to contaminate Mars with Earth's bacteria or fungi, these samples could, in theory, survive and lurk on Mars for up to hundreds millions of years.

[9]

"We concluded that terrestrial contamination on Mars would essentially be permanent – over timeframes of thousands of years," said [10]Brian Hoffman , a senior co-author of the paper and a professor of chemistry and molecular sciences at Northwestern University. "This could complicate scientific efforts to look for Martian life. Likewise, if microbes evolved on Mars, they could be capable of surviving until present day. That means returning Mars samples could contaminate Earth." ®

Get our [11]Tech Resources



[1] https://regmedia.co.uk/2022/10/25/conan_the_bacterium.jpg

[2] https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/ast.2022.0065

[3] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/20/curiosity_mount_sharp/

[4] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/11/mars_climate_microbes/

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/06/japans_martian_moons_exploration_mission/

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2022/09/30/mars_water_study/

[7] https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2022/10/ancient-bacteria-might-lurk-beneath-mars-surface/?fj=1

[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Y1lZl4iGXT-LEA7VX5HPOQAAAJA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y1lZl4iGXT-LEA7VX5HPOQAAAJA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[10] https://chemistry.northwestern.edu/people/core-faculty/profiles/brian-hoffman.html

[11] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



"could not survive dormant for the estimated 2 to 2.5 billion years"

Neil Barnes

The first hundred million years were the worst.

The second hundred million years were the worst, as well.

After that I went into a bit of a decline...

Re: "could not survive dormant for the estimated 2 to 2.5 billion years"

Paul Herber

Don't talk to me about life on Mars!

Re: "could not survive dormant for the estimated 2 to 2.5 billion years"

Anonymous Coward

"Don't talk to me about life on Mars!"

Why ???!!!

I quite liked Bowie !!!

:)

Re: "could not survive dormant for the estimated 2 to 2.5 billion years"

Paul Herber

There's (probably) not enought water on Mars for any equivalent to Davy Jones and his locker.

Re: "could not survive dormant for the estimated 2 to 2.5 billion years"

Steve Button

Here I am quietly contemplating the meaning of life for 280 million years and everything seems just fine, but at 280 million years and one day, which happened to be a Monday, it all seems a bit pointless.

Re: "could not survive dormant for the estimated 2 to 2.5 billion years"

Paul Herber

Here I am quietly contemplating the meaning of life for 280 million years and everything seems just fine, but at 280 million years and one day, which happened to be a Monday Thursday, it all seems a bit pointless.

Re: "could not survive dormant for the estimated 2 to 2.5 billion years"

Version 1.0

But we were "born" about 3.5 billion years ago - [1]documented by Dr. Neil Shubin; initially we were fish that worked their way out of the shallow water and started walking around (on four new legs) so the potential for discovering fossils on Mars that reveal a new form of evolution is very interesting. Maybe only microbes these days but in the past we might find a real physical person existed on the planet.

[1] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1662160.Your_Inner_Fish

Deep biosphere

Death Boffin

Given the deep biosphere here on earth having life thousands of meters underground, I could see life on Mars still being there after billions of years.

It is also quite possible that it has the same DNA. There has been quite a lot of cross contamination due to meteor strikes over the last few billion years.

Paul Cooper

Given that there are Martian meteorites on Earth, it is almost certain that there will be terrestrial meteorites on Mars. So, if a terrestrial meteorite (which we know would have a good chance of carrying terrestrial microorganisms such as D. radiodurans) landed on the Martian polar caps, it could easily have a short-lived environment after landing during which surviving bacteria could reproduce. As there is evidence for repeated melting and refreezing at the Martian Poles (e.g. "Spiders" and "trees"), it seems to me that we should EXPECT there to be bacteria or similar micro-organisms at least in the vicinity of the polar ice caps.

Version 1.0

Given that a strike on Mars, throwing rocks into space, means that gravitation would pull them towards the sun, I suspect that any rocks thrown from the Earth might be more likely to be found on Venus. Certainly some might head towards Mars but I think the chances are low so we'll probably not find any dinosaur fragments on Mars.

The chances of anything coming from earth are a trillion to one, they said...

Brewster's Angle Grinder

It's actually quite hard to launch meteorites into space. This [1]link suggests: "a minimum crater diameter of ~25km, even before the effects of atmospheric drag on Earth-launched projectiles is considered." and then goes on to suggest ejecta probably don't achieve the necessary escape velocities which "...questions the potential existence of terrestrial meteorites." We've not found any that have dropped back to earth - though they'd probably burn up and be hard to recognise if they survived.

But supposing it's possible, your bacterium has got to survive the impact and launch. It will then be on a ~20cm "pebble" (ibid) where it has to survive the vicissitudes of space for hundreds of thousands of years (for an earth-moon journey), or probably a few million years (for an earth-Mars journey).

It's then got to survive the entry and impact onto Mars, and land in just the right place.

[1] https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael-Simms-2/publication/253883199_Where_are_all_the_Terrestrial_Meteorites/links/547c56310cf205d1688203f3/Where-are-all-the-Terrestrial-Meteorites.pdf

heyrick

# The chances of anything coming from Mars, were a million to one, they said...

beat me to it :)

Richard Gray 1

but still they come!!

(maybe)

Do Do Doooo Do Do Doooo

Wheee ooooww

Re: beat me to it :)

Anonymous Coward

Ooh, after the whole American-spelling row, here's a spelling-related thing we could finally get agreement on: should it be "Do Do Doooo", or "Dum Dum Dummmm"?

"The best chance of finding these hypothetical microbes would be to look below the planet's surface"

Mike 137

I wrote a short story (actually called "Red Planet") in 1994 proposing this to be the case. Prescience? More likely just common sense.

Brewster's Angle Grinder

Most prescience is. But then common sense is vanishingly rare.

Never call a man a fool. Borrow from him.